This study provides new evidence showing that the union wage premium in the late nineteenth century in the United States was lower than previously believed. Analysis of wage and productivity data from an 1890 survey of individual workers in Maine yields a 9.2% union-nonunion wage gap, once correction is made for self-selection bias (the disproportionate representation in unions of workers who, because of skills and other attributes, would probably gain above-average wages even in the absence of unions). The author argues that business cycle conditions and distinctive union dynamics can affect the results of analyses that employ the Heckman procedure, a common procedure designed to correct for self-selection bias.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CardDavid, and OlsonCraig A.. 1995. “Bargaining Power, Strike Durations, and Wage Outcomes: An Analysis of Strikes in the 1880's.”Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 13, No. 1 (January), pp. 32–61.
2.
CarterSusan B., and SutchRichard. 1989. “Micro-Level Data Sets Suitable for Investigation of Macroeconomic Issues Extracted from Reports of the State Bureaus of Labor Statistics, Circa 1890.” University of California—Berkeley Working Paper No. 89–114, July.
3.
CommonsJohn R.PerlmanSelig, and TaftPhilip. 1935. History of Labor in the U. S., 1896–1932. New York: Macmillan.
4.
CraigBen. 1989. “An Empirical Model of Strikes in Late Nineteenth Century New York.” University of Indiana Working Paper.
5.
DillonPatricia, and GangIra. 1987. “Earnings Effects of Labor Organizations in 1890.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 40, No. 4 (July), pp. 516–27.
6.
DoltonP. J., and MakepeaceG. H.. 1987. “Interpreting Sample Selection Effects.”Economics Letters, Vol. 24, pp. 373–79.
7.
DouglasPaul H.1930. Real Wages in the United States, 1890–1926. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
8.
EichengreenBarry. 1987. “The Impact of Late Nineteenth-Century Unions on Labor Earnings and Hours: Iowa in 1894.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 40, No. 4 (July), pp. 501–15.
9.
FriedmanGerald. 1988. “Strike Success and Union Ideology: The United States and France, 1880–1914.”Journal of Economic History, Vol. 48, No. 1 (March), pp. 1–25.
10.
GompersSamuel. 1925. Seventy Years of Life and Labor. New York: E.P. Dutton.
11.
HanesChristopher. 1992. “The Development of Nominal Rage Rigidity in the Late Nineteenth Century.” University of Pennsylvania Working Paper, April.
12.
HattonT. J.BoyerG. R., and BaileyR. E.. 1994. “The Union Wage Effect in Late Nineteenth Century Britain.”Economica, Vol. 61, pp. 435–56.
13.
HeckmanJames J.1976. “The Common Structure of Statistical Models of Truncation, Sample Selection, and Limited Dependent Variables, and a Simple Estimator for Such Models.”Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, Vol. 5, pp. 475–92.
14.
Iowa Bureau of Labor Statistics. 1895. Sixth Biennial Report. Des Moines, Iowa: State Printer.
15.
KeyssarAlexander. 1986. Out of Work. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16.
LeeLung-Fei. 1978. “Unionism and Wage Rates: A Simultaneous Equations Model with Qualitative and Limited Dependent Variables.”International Economic Review, Vol. 19, No. 2 (June), pp. 415–32.
17.
LorwinLewis L.1933. The American Federation of Labor. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
18.
Maine Bureau of Industrial and Labor Statistics. 1890. Fifth Annual Report. Augusta: Harold Burton Brothers.
19.
MullinDavid, and MullinDebbie. 1995. “The Sources of Solidarity in Nineteenth-Century American Unions.” Oberlin College Discussion Papers in Economics, August.
20.
MullinDebbie. 1993. “The Porous Umbrella of the AFL: Evidence from Nineteenth-Century State Labor Bureau Reports on the Establishment of American Unions.” Diss., University of Virginia.
21.
RansomRoger L., and SutchRichard. 1989. Codebook and User's Manual: A Survey of 1,084 Workers in Maine, 1890, Reported in the Fifth Annual Report of the Maine Bureau of Industrial and Labor Statistics. Berkeley, Calif.: Institute of Business and Economic Research.
22.
RezneckSamuel. 1953. “Unemployment, Unrest, and Relief in the United States During the Depression of 1893–97.”Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 61, No. 4 (August), pp. 324–45.
23.
TaftPhilip. 1957. The A. F. of L. in the Time of Gompers. New York: Harper & Brothers.
24.
WolmanLeo. 1924. The Growth of American Trade Unions, 1880–1923. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
25.
WolmanLeo. 1936. Ebb and Flow in Trade Unionism. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
