The authors test for a link between unionization and net investment rates in Canadian manufacturing. Analysis of data on 18 industries for the years 1967–87 reveals a negative non-linear relationship: the presence of unions appears to have reduced investment when the percentage of firms in the industry that were unionized was between 0% and approximately 50%, with a plateau or slight positive marginal effect above this level. In an industry moving from no unions to the mean level of unionization, net investment and gross investment are predicted to fall by 66–74% and 18–25%, respectively.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbowdJohn M.1989. “The Effect of Wage Bargains on the Stock Market Value of the Firm.”American Economic Review, Vol. 79 (September), pp. 774–800.
2.
AshenfelterOrley C., and JohnsonGeorge E.. 1969. “Bargaining Theory, Trade Unions, and Industrial Strike Activity.”American Economic Review, Vol. 59 (March), pp. 35–49.
3.
BaldwinCarliss Y.1983. “Productivity and Labor Unions: An Application of the Theory of Self-Enforcing Contracts.”Journal of Business, Vol. 56 (April), pp. 155–85.
4.
BeckerBrian E., and OlsonCraig A.. 1992. “Unions and Firm Profits.”Industrial Relations, Vol. 31 (Fall), pp. 395–415.
5.
BoadwayRobinBruceNeil, and MintzJack. 1984. “Taxation, Inflation, and the Effective Marginal Tax Rate on Capital in Canada.”Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol. 17, No. 1 (March), pp. 62–79.
6.
BronarsSteven G., and DeereDonald R.. 1993. “Unionization, Incomplete Contracting, and Capital Investment.”Journal of Business, Vol. 66 (January), pp. 117–132.
7.
BronarsSteven G., and DeereDonald R.1994. “Unionization and Profitability: Evidence of Spillover Effects.”Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 102 (December), pp. 1281–87.
8.
BronarsSteven G.DeereDonald R., and TracyJoseph S.. 1994. “The Effects of Unions on Firm Behavior: An Empirical Analysis Using Firm-Level Data.”Industrial Relations, Vol. 33 (October), pp. 426–51.
9.
CarmichaelH. L.1984. “Reputations in the Labor Market.”American Economic Review, Vol. 74 (September), pp. 713–25.
10.
ClarkKim B.1984. “Unionization and Firm Performance: The Impact on Profits.”American Economic Review, Vol. 74 (December), pp. 893–919.
11.
ClarkPeter K.1979. “Investment in the 1970's: Theory, Performance, and Prediction.”Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 1, pp. 73–113.
12.
CrawfordVincent. 1988. “Long-Term Relationships Governed by Short-Term Contracts.”American Economic Review, Vol. 78 (June), pp. 485–99.
13.
DavidsonRussell, and MacKinnonJames G.. 1993. Estimation and Inference in Econometrics. New York: Oxford University Press.
14.
FujimagariDavid. 1990. “The DSS/OCIB Input-Output Database,” Technical Study No. 90–1, Institute for Policy Analysis, University of Toronto.
15.
GaudetG. O.MayJ. D., and McFetridgeD. G.. 1976. “Optimal Capital Accumulation: The Neoclassical Framework in a Canadian Context.”Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 58, No. 3 (August), pp. 269–73.
16.
GroutPaul A.1984. “Investment and Wages in the Absence of Binding Contracts: A Nash Bargaining Approach.”Econometrica, Vol. 46 (March), pp. 449–60.
17.
GundersonMorley. 1982. “Union Impact on Wages, Fringe Benefits, and Productivity.” In AndersonJohn and GundersonMorley, eds., Union-Management Relations in Canada. Don Mills, Ont.: Addison-Wesley, pp. 247–68.
18.
HallR. E. and JorgensonD. W.. 1967. “Tax Policy and Investment Behavior,”American Economic Review, Vol. 57, pp. 391–414.
19.
HirschBarry T.1990. “Innovative Activity, Productivity Growth, and Firm Performance: Are Labor Unions a Spur or a Deterrent?”Advances in Applied Micro-Economics, Vol. 5. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, pp. 69–104.
20.
HirschBarry T.1991. Labor Unions and the Economic Performance of Firms. Kalamazoo, Mich.: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
21.
HirschBarry T.1992. “Firm Investment Behavior and Collective Bargaining Strategy.”Industrial Relations, Vol. 31 (Winter), pp. 95–121.
22.
MacHinStephen, and WadhwaniSushil. 1991. “The Effects of Unions on Investment and Innovation: Evidence from WIRS.”Economic Journal, Vol. 101 (March), pp. 324–30.
23.
NeweyWhitney, and WestKenneth D.. 1987. “A Simple, Positive Semi-Definite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix.”Econometrica, Vol. 55, pp. 703–6.
24.
PencavelJohn H.1991. Labor Markets under Trade Unionism: Employment, Wages, and Hours. Cambridge, Mass.: Basil Blackwell.
25.
RosenSherwin. 1969. “Trade Union Power, Threat Effects and the Extent of Organization.”Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 36 (April), pp. 185–96.
26.
Statistics Canada. Various years. “Corporations and Labour Unions Returns Act Part II — Labour Unions,” Catalogue 71–202. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
27.
Statistics Canada. Various years. “Corporation Taxation Statistics,” Catalogue 61–208. Ottawa: Statistics Canada. (Published by Dominion Bureau of Statistics until 1968.)
28.
Statistics Canada. Various years. “Corporations and Labour Unions Returns Act Part II — Labour Unions,” Catalogue 71–202. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
29.
Statistics Canada. Various years. “Corporations and Labour Unions Returns Act: Report.”Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
30.
Statistics Canada. 1983. Fixed Capital Flows and Stocks: Historical 1936–1983, Catalogue 13–568. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
31.
Statistics Canada. 1991 (?). “Fixed Capital Flows and Stocks: Methodology,” National Wealth and Capital Stock Section technical report. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
32.
Van der PloegF.1987. “Trade Unions, Investment, and Employment: A Non-Cooperative Approach.”European Economic Review, Vol. 31 (October), pp. 477–501.
33.
WoodW. D., and KumarPradeep. 1979. The Current Industrial Relations Scene in Canada, 1979. Kingston, Ont.: Industrial Relations Centre, Queen's University.
