This study compares the corporate performance in 1990/91 of two groups of public companies: those in which employees owned more than 5% of the company's stock, and all others. The results of the analysis, which looks at profitability, productivity, and compensation, are consistent with neither negative nor highly positive views of employee ownership, but where differences are found, they are favorable to companies with employee ownership, especially among companies of small size. The circumstances in which employee ownership was used—specifically, whether it was part of a wage/benefit concession package and whether it was involved in a takeover threat—do not appear to have had a significant effect on the 1990 performance levels or 1980–90 performance growth of the firms. Although the authors caution that the data do not permit clear tests of causality, these results are broadly consistent with those of past studies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlchianArmen A., and DemsetzHarold. 1972. “Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization.”American Economic Review, Vol. 62, No. 5 (December), pp. 777–95.
2.
American Capital Strategies. 1994. The American Capital Strategies Employee Ownership Index: Perforance Figures 1991–94. Bethesda, Md.: American Capital Strategies.
3.
AxelrodRobert M.1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
4.
BlasiJoseph R.1988. Employee Ownership: Revolution or Ripoff?New York: HarperCollins.
5.
BlasiJoseph R., and KruseDouglas L.. 1991. The New Owners: The Mass Emergence of Employee Ownership in Public Companies and What it Means to American Business. New York: HarperCollins.
6.
BoninJ. P.JonesDerek C., and PuttermanLouis. 1993. “Theoretical and Empirical Studies of Producer Cooperatives: Will Ever the Twain Meet?”Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 31 (September), pp. 1290–1320.
7.
BoninJ. P., and PuttermanLouis. 1988. Economics of Cooperation and the Labor-Managed Economy. Chur, Switzerland: Harwood.
8.
BrooksLeroy D.HenryJames B., and LivingstonD. Tom. 1982. “How Profitable Are Employee Stock Ownership Plans?”Financial Executive, Vol. 50 (May), pp. 32–40.
9.
Commission on the Future of Worker-Management Relations. 1994. Report and Recommendations. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Depts. of Labor and Commerce, December.
10.
ConteMichael A., and LawrenceHelen. 1992. “Trends in ESOPs.” In TurnerJohn A. and BellerDaniel L., eds., Trends in Pensions, 1992. Washington, D.C.: GPO, pp. 135–148.
11.
ConteMichael A., and SvejnarJan. 1990. “The Performance Effects of Employee Ownership Plans.” In BlinderA. S., ed., Paying for Productivity: A Look at the Evidence. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, pp. 143–72.
12.
CraigBen, and PencavelJohn. 1995. “Participation and Productivity: A Comparison of Worker Cooperatives and Conventional Firms in the Plywood Industry.”Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, pp. 121–60.
13.
DoucouliagosChris. 1995. “Participation and Productivity in Labor-Managed and Participatory Capitalist Firms: A Meta-Analysis.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 49, No. 1 (October), pp. 58–77.
14.
FitzRoyFelix R., and KraftKornelius. 1987. “Cooperation, Productivity, and Profit Sharing.”Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 102, No. 1 (February), pp. 23–35.
15.
FudenbergDrew, and MaskinEric. 1986. “The Folk Theorem in Repeated Games with Discounting or with Incomplete Information.”Econometrica, Vol. 54, No. 3 (May), pp. 533–54.
16.
JonesDerek C., and KatoTakao. 1995. “The Productivity Effects of Employee Stock Ownership Plans and Bonuses: Evidence from Japanese Panel Data.”American Economic Review, Vol. 85, No. 3 (June), pp. 391–415.
17.
KandelEugene, and LazearEdward P.. 1992. “Peer Pressure and Partnerships.”Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 100, No. 4 (August), pp. 801–17.
18.
KruseDouglas L.1993. Profit Sharing: Does It Make a Difference?Kalamazoo, Mich.: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
19.
KruseDouglas L.1995. “Pension Substitution in the 1980s: Why the Shift Toward Defined Contribution Plans?”Industrial Relations, Vol. 34, No. 2 (April), pp. 218–41.
20.
KruseDouglas L., and BlasiJoseph. Forthcoming. “Employee Ownership, Employee Attitudes, and Firm Performance: A Review of the Evidence.” In LewinDavidMitchellDaniel, and ZaidiMahmood, eds., Handbook of Human Resources. Greenwich, Conn.JAI Press.
21.
KumbhakarSubal C., and DunbarAmy E.. 1993. “The Elusive ESOP-Productivity Link.”Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 52, No. 2 (September), pp. 273–83.
22.
LevineDavid I.1995. Reinventing the Workplace: How Business and Employees Can Both Win. Washington, D.C.: Brooking Institution.
23.
MitchellDaniel J.B.LewinDavid, and LawlerEdward E.III. 1990. “Alternative Pay Systems, Firm Performance, and Productivity.” In BlinderA.S., ed., Paying for Productivity: A Look at the Evidence. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, pp. 15–94.
24.
NalbantianHaig R.1987. Incentives, Cooperation, and Risk Sharing: Economic and Psychological Perspectives on Employment Contracts. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman & Littlefield.
25.
ParkSangsoo, and SongMoon H.. 1995. “Employee Stock Ownership Plans, Firm Performance, and Monitoring by Outside Blockholders.”Financial Management, Vol. 24, No. 4 (Winter), pp. 52–65.
26.
PuttermanLouis, and SkillmanGil. 1988. “The Incentive Effects of Monitoring Under Alternative Compensation Schemes.”International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 109–19.
27.
RosenCorey, and QuarreyMichael. 1987. “How Well Is Employee Ownership Working?”Harvard Business Review, Vol. 65 (September—October), pp. 126–130.
28.
RousseeuwP. J., and LeroyA. M.. 1987. Robust Regression and Outlier Detection. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
29.
U.S. GAO. 1987. Employee Stock Ownership Plans: Little Evidence of Effects on Corporate Performance. Washington, D.C.: U.S. General Accounting Office.
30.
WeissAndrew. 1987. “Incentives and Worker Behavior: Some Evidence.” In NalbantianHaig R., ed., Incentives, Cooperation, and Risk Sharing: Economic and Psychological Perspectives on Employment Contracts. Totowa, N.J.Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 137–50.
31.
WeitzmanMartin, and KruseDouglas. 1990. “Profit Sharing and Productivity.” In BlinderA. S., ed., Paying for Productivity: A Look at the Evidence. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, pp. 95–141.
