The case studies of Singapore, Malaysia, the Philippines, and India presented in this paper support the author's contention that a country's industrialization strategy for economic development profoundly influences its industrial relations (IR) and human resources (HR) policy goals. The author finds that import substitution industrialization was associated with IR/HR policy goals of pluralism and stability, while a low-cost export-oriented industrialization strategy was associated with IR/HR policy goals of cost containment and union suppression. In countries that moved from a low-cost export-oriented strategy to a higher value added export-oriented strategy, the focus of IR/HR policy goals shifted from cost containment to work force flexibility and skills development. The four countries diverged, however, in the specific institutions and arrangements they adopted to meet national IR/HR policy goals, due to different political choices made by dominant actors and different institutional industrial relations histories.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbreuRobin. 1994. “The Economy” (column). India Today, April 15, p. 90.
2.
ArudsothyPonniah. 1990. “The State and Industrial Relations in Developing Countries: The Malaysian Situation.”ASEAN Economic Bulletin, Vol. 6, No. 3 (March).
3.
ArudsothyPonniah, and LittlerCraig. 1993. “State Regulation and Fragmentation In Malaysia.” In FrenkelStephen, ed., Organized Labor in the Asia-Pacific Region: A Comparative Study of Trade Unions in Nine Countries. Ithaca, N.Y.: ILR Press.
4.
BeginJames. 1995. “Industrial Relations In Singapore.” In FrenkelStephen and HarrodJeffrey, eds., Industrialization and Labor Relations: Contemporary Research in Seven Countries. Ithaca, N.Y.: ILR Press.
5.
BelloWaldenKinleyDavid, and ElinsonElaine. 1988. Development Debacle: The World Bank in the Philippines. San Francisco: Institute for Food and Development Policy, Philippine Solidarity Network.
6.
BelloWalden, and VerzolaRoberto. 1993. Revisioning Philippine Industrialization. Manila: Freedom From Debt Coalition.
7.
BjorkmanMajaLauridsenLaurids, and MarcussenHerbert. 1988. “Types of Industrialization and Capital-Labour Relations In the Third World.” In SouthallRoger, ed., Trade Unions and the New Industrialization of the Third World. London: Zed.
8.
BowieAlasdair. 1991. Crossing the Industrial Divide: State, Society, and the Politics of Economic Transformation in Malaysia. New York: Columbia University Press.
9.
BrooksKaren. 1995. “Economic Development and Industrial Relations in Indonesia.” Unpublished Paper, Cornell University.
10.
ChengTun-Jen. 1990. “Political Regimes and Development Strategies: South Korea and Taiwan.” In GereffiGary and WymanDonald, eds., Manufacturing Miracles: Paths of Industrialization in Latin America and East Asia. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
11.
ChewS. B., and ChewRosalind. 1995. “Impact of Development Strategy on Industrial Relations In Singapore.” In VermaAnilKochanThomas A., and LansburyRussel, eds., Employment Relations in Asia. London: Routledge.
12.
ChiangT. B.1988. “The Administration and Enforcement of Collective Agreements in Singapore.” In The Administration and Enforcement of Collective Agreements—A Survey of the Current Situation in ASEAN. Bangkok: International Labour Organization, pp. 239–46.
13.
Department of Labor and Employment. 1985, 1986, and 1993. Annual Yearbook of Labor Statistics. Manila: Bureau of Labor and Employment Statistics.
14.
DeyoFrederick. 1989. Beneath the Miracle: Labour Subordination in East Asian Development. Berkeley: University of California Press.
15.
DomboisRainer, and PriesLudger. 1994. “Structural Change and Trends in the Evolution of Industrial Relations in Latin America.” Paper Presented at the 16th Conference of the International Working Party in Labour Market Segmentation, Strasbourg, July.
16.
FrenkelStephen. 1993. Organized Labor in the Asia-Pacific Region: A Comparative Study of Trade Unions in Nine Countries. Ithaca, N.Y.: ILR Press.
17.
FrenkelStephen, and HarrodJeffrey A.. 1995. Industrialization and Labor Relations: Contemporary Research in Seven Countries. Ithaca, N.Y.: ILR Press.
18.
GereffiGary, and WymanDonald L.. 1990. Manufacturing Miracles: Paths of Industrialization in Latin America and East Asia. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
19.
GraceElizabeth. 1990. Short Circuiting Labour: Unionizing Electronic Workers in Malaysia. Kuala Lampur: Insan.
20.
HaggardStephan. 1990. Pathways from the Periphery: The Politics of Growth in the Newly Industrializing Countries. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
21.
HuffW. G.1987. “Patterns in the Economic Development of Singapore.”Journal of Developing Areas, Vol. 21, No. 3 (April), pp. 305–25.
22.
KatzHarry. 1994. “The Decentralization of Industrial Relations: A Literature Review and Comparative Analysis.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 47, No. 1 (October), pp. 3–22.
23.
KatzHarryKuruvillaSarosh, and TurnerLowell. 1993. “Trade Unions and Collective Bargaining.” Policy Research Working Papers, Education and Social Policy Department, The World Bank.
24.
KerrCharlesDunlopJohnHarbisonFrederick, and MyersCharles. 1964. Industrialism, and Industrial Man. New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
KrislovJoseph, and LeggettChris. 1985. “Singapore's Industrial Arbitration Court: Changing Roles and Current Prospects.”Arbitration Journal, Vol. 40, pp. 18–24.
26.
KuruvillaSarosh. 1996a. “The Linkages Between Industrialization Strategies, National Industrial Relations Policies, and Workplace IR/HR Policies In Southeast Asia.” In WeverKirsten and TurnerLowell, eds., Comparative Political Economy of Industrial Relations. Madison, Wis.: 1995 IRRA Research Volume.
27.
KuruvillaSarosh. 1996b. “The Influence of National Industrialization Strategies on Workplace Human Resource Practices.”Human Resource Management Journal, forthcoming.
28.
KuruvillaSarosh, and ArudsothyPonniah. 1995. “Economic Development, National Industrial Relations Policies, and Workplace IR Practices In Malaysia.” In VermaAnilKochanThomas A., and LansburyRussel, eds., Employment Relations in the Growing Asian Economies. London: Routledge.
29.
KuruvillaSarosh, and EricksonChristopher. 1994. “Critical Junctures in Industrial Relations System Transformation: A Study of Nine Countries.” Paper Presented at the Fourth Bargaining Conference, University of Toronto, October 14–15.
30.
KuruvillaSarosh, and PagnuccoAdam. 1994. “NAFTA, AFTA, and Industrial Relations In Asia.” In KatzHarry C. and CookMaria, eds., Regional Integration and Industrial Relations in North America. Ithaca, N.Y.: Institute for Collective Bargaining.
31.
LansingPaul, and KuruvillaSarosh. 1987. “Industrial Dispute Resolution in India: Theory and Practice.”Loyola, of Los Angeles International and Comparative law Journal, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 345–75.
32.
LevinDavid, and NgSek Hong. 1995. “Economic Development and Industrial Relations In Hongkong.” In VermaAnilKochanThomas A., and LansburyRussel, eds., Employment Relations in the Growing Asian Economies. London: Routledge.
33.
MacArayaBach, and OfreneoRene. 1993. “Structural Adjustment and Industrial Relations: The Philippine Experience.” Paper presented at the Conference on Industrial Relations in Asia and East Africa, Sydney, September 5–7.
34.
MathurAjeet. 1991. “The Experience of Consultation During Structural Adjustment in India (1990–1992).”International Labour Review, Vol. 132, No. 3, pp. 331–45.
35.
MathurAjeet. 1994. “Labor and the Philippine Economy.” Unpublished manuscript, University of the Philippines, School of Labor and Industrial Relations.
36.
OnnFong Chan. 1989. “Wages and Labour Welfare in the Malaysian Electronics Industry.”Labour and Society, Vol. 14 (Special Issue on High Tech and Labour), pp. 81–102.
37.
OnnFong Chan. “Singapore.”1981. In BlumAlbert, ed., International Handbook of Industrial Relations. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood, pp. 481–98.
38.
ParkYoung-Bum, and LeeMichael Byungnum. 1995. “Economic Development, Globalization, and Practices In Industrial Relations and Human Resources Management in Korea.” In VermaAnilKochanThomas A., and LansburyRussel, eds., Employment Relations in the Growing Asian Economies. London: Routledge.
39.
PSDC (Penang Skills Development Center). 1993. Training for Change: The Way to a Better Future. Penang: PSDC.
40.
RajahRasiah. Forthcoming. “Changing Organization of Work in Malaysia's Electronics Industry.”International Labor Review.
41.
RamaswamyE. A.1983. “Indian Management Dilemma: Economic Versus Political Unions.”Asian Survey, Vol. 23, No. 8 (August), pp. 976–90.
42.
ReddyY.R.K.1978. “Determination of Collective Bargaining Agency: Search for a Procedure.”Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 14, No. 1 (July), pp. 73–86.
43.
RodanGarry. 1989. The Political Economy of Singapore's Industrialization: National State and International Capital. New York: St. Martin's.
44.
RoemerMichael. 1981. “Dependence and Industrialization Strategies.”World Development, Vol. 9, No. 5, pp. 429–34.
45.
SalihKamalYoungMei Ling, and RasiahRajah. 1988. Transnational Capital and Local Conjuncture: The Semiconductor Industry in Penang. Malaysian Institute of Economic Research.
46.
SarathD.1992. Employment and Unionism in Indian Industry. New Delhi: Frederick Ebert Foundation.
47.
BasuSharma. 1985. Aspects of Industrial Relations in ASEAN. Singapore: Institute for Asian Studies.
48.
SharmaBasuVermaAnil, and KuruvillaSarosh. 1994. “Strategic Economic Cooperation and Growth Triangles in Southeast Asia.” Paper presented at the Changing Employment Relations and Human Resource Management Conference in Asia, Taipei, Chung-Hua Institute for Economic Research, June.
49.
ShethN. R.1991. Some Thoughts on Trade Unions. Ahmendabad: Indian Institute of Management.
50.
SodhiJ. S.1993. “New Economic Policies and Their Impact on Industrial Relations.”Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 29, No. 1 (July), pp. 31–54.
51.
SpinangerDean. 1986. Industrialization Policies and Regional Economic Development in Malaysia. Singapore: Oxford University Press.
52.
Straits Times. 1993. “SNEF to Workers, Don't Expect Too Much.” Friday, November 19, p. 2.
53.
VenkataratnamC.1993. “Impact of New Economic Policies on the Role of Trade Unions.”Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 29, No. 1 (July), pp. 56–77.
54.
VillegasE.1988. The Political Economy of Philippine Labor Laws. Quezon City, the Philippines: Foundation for Nationalist Studies, Inc., pp. 38–51.
55.
YoungMei Ling, and SiewKiat Ng. 1992. Balancing the Roles of Public and Private Sectors in Education and Training. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Malaysian Institute for Economic Research.
