Although it is commonly argued that unions need to innovate in order to grow and achieve success, little is known about the characteristics of unions that facilitate or hinder innovation. The authors of this study develop a model of union innovation and test it using data collected from many sources, including a 1990 survey of 275 officials and staff members from 111 American national unions. The results suggest that certain union characteristics, such as environmental monitoring (systematic monitoring by the union of developments that could affect it) and rationalization (good structuring and management of administrative activities), are positively associated with innovative behavior. In addition, there is a positive relationship between innovation and the heterogeneity of a union's members.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AFL-CIO Committee on the Evolution of Work. 1985. The Changing Situation of Workers and Their Unions. Washington, D.C.: AFL-CIO.
2.
AikenMichael, and HageJerald. 1971. “The Organic Organization and Innovation.”Sociology, Vol. 5, No. 1 (January), pp. 63–82.
3.
BakerStephen. 1995. “The Yelping Over Labor's New Tactics.”Business Week (October 23), p. 75.
4.
BarbashJack. 1967. American Unions: Structure, Government, and Politics. New York: Random House.
5.
BokDerek C., and DunlopJohn T.. 1970. Labor and the American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
6.
BronfenbrennerKate L.1994. “Employer Behavior In Certification Elections and First-Contract Campaigns: Implications for Labor Law Reform.” In FriedmanSheldonHurdRichard W.OswaldRudolph A., and SeeberRonald L., eds., Restoring the Promise of American Labor Law. Ithaca, N.Y.: ILR Press, pp. 75–89.
7.
Bureau of National Affairs. 1989. “American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations Paid Membership.”Daily Labor Report, No. 235, pp. E1–E3.
8.
ByrneMichael. 1992. “Organizing Success: More Resources, Hard Work.”AFL-CIO News, Vol. 37 (August 17), p. 4.
9.
ChildJohnLoveridgeRay, and WarnerMalcolm. 1973. “Towards an Organizational Study of Trade Unions.”Sociology, Vol. 7, No. 1 (January), pp. 71–91.
10.
CleggHugh. 1976. Trade Unionism Under Collective Bargaining. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
11.
CraftJames A.1991. “Unions, Bureaucracy, and Change: Old Dogs Learn New Tricks Very Slowly.”Journal of Labor Research, Vol. 12, No. 4 (Fall), pp. 393–405.
12.
CurmeMichael A.HirschBarry T., and MacPhersonDavid A.. 1990. “Union Membership and Contract Coverage in the United States 1983–1988.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 44, No. 1 (October), pp. 5–33.
13.
DaftRichard. 1982. “Bureaucratic Versus Nonbureaucratic Structure and the Process of Innovation and Change.”Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 1. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, pp. 129–66.
14.
DamanpourFariborz. 1991. “Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators.”Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 34, No. 3 (September), pp. 555–90.
15.
DamanpourFariborz, and EvanWilliam M.. 1984. “Organizational Innovation and Performance: The Problem of Organizational Lag.”Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 3 (September), pp. 392–409.
16.
DelaneyJohn ThomasFioritoJack, and JarleyPaul. 1991. Union Innovation and Effectiveness: Results from the National Union Survey. Working Paper 91–01, Industrial Relations Institute, University of Iowa.
17.
DelaneyJohn ThomasFioritoJack, and MastersMarick F.. 1988. “The Effects of Union Organizational and Environmental Characteristics on Union Political Action.”American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 32, No. 3 (August), pp. 616–42.
18.
DewarRobert D., and DuttonJane E.. 1986. “The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis.”Management Science, Vol. 32, No. 11 (November), pp. 1422–33.
19.
EdelsteinJ. David, and WarnerMalcolm. 1975. Comparative Union Democracy: Organization and Opposition in British and American Unions. London: Halstead.
20.
FioritoJackGrammCynthia L., and HendricksWallace E.. 1991. “Union Structural Choices.” In StraussGeorgeGallagherDaniel G., and FioritoJack, eds., The State of the Unions. Madison, Wis.: Industrial Relations Research Association, pp. 103–37.
21.
FioritoJack, and HendricksWallace E.. 1987. “Union Characteristics and Bargaining Outcomes.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 40, No. 4 (July), pp. 569–84.
22.
FioritoJack, and JarleyPaul. 1992. “Associate Membership Programs: Innovation and Diversification in National Unions.”Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 35, No. 5 (December), pp. 1070–85.
23.
FioritoJackJarleyPaul, and DelaneyJohn Thomas. 1995. “National Union Effectiveness in Organizing: Measures and Influences.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 48, No. 4 (July), pp. 613–35.
24.
FioritoJack, and MarantoCheryl L.. 1987. “The Contemporary Decline of Union Strength.”Contemporary Policy Issues, Vol. 5, No. 4 (October), pp. 12–27.
25.
GiffordCourtney D.1984, 1988. Directory of U.S. Labor Organizations. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of National Affairs.
26.
GrabelskyJeffrey, and HurdRichard. 1994. “Reinventing an Organizing Union: Strategies for Change.” In Industrial Relations Research Association, Proceedings of the Forty-Sixth Annual Meeting.Madison, Wis.: IRRA, pp. 95–104.
27.
HageJerald. 1980. Theories of Organizations. New York: Wiley.
28.
HeckscherCharles C.1988. The New Unionism. New York: Basic Books.
29.
HendricksWallace E.GrammCynthia L., and FioritoJack. 1993. “Centralization of Bargaining Decisions in American Unions.”Industrial Relations, Vol. 32, No. 3 (Fall), pp. 367–90.
30.
HoekstraPete. 1993. “Mandated Cooperation: A 90s Oxymoron.”The Wall Street Journal, June 7, p. a10.
31.
IchniowskiCasey, and ZaxJeffrey S.. 1990. “Today's Associations, Tomorrow's Unions.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 43, No. 2 (January), pp. 191–208.
32.
JarleyPaul, and FioritoJack. 1990. “Associate Membership: Unionism or Consumerism?”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 43, No. 2 (January), pp. 209–24.
33.
JarleyPaul, and MarantoCheryl L.. 1990. “Union Corporate Campaigns: An Assessment.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 43, No. 5 (July), pp. 505–24.
34.
KimberlyJohn R.1981. “Managerial Innovation.” In NystromPaul C. and StarbuckWilliam H., eds., Handbook of Organizational Design, Vol. 1. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 84–104.
35.
KimberlyJohn R., and EvaniskoMichael J.. 1981. “Organizational Innovation: The Influence of Individual, Organizational, and Contextual Factors on Hospital Adoption of Technological and Administrative Innovations.”Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 24, No. 4 (December), pp. 689–713.
36.
KnokeDavid. 1990. Organizing for Collective Action. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
37.
KochanThomas A.1980. Collective Bargaining and Industrial Relations. Homewood, Ill.: Irwin.
38.
LahneHerbert J.1970. “Union Constitutions and Collective Bargaining Procedures.” In SeidmanJoel, ed., Trade Union Government and Collective Bargaining. New York: Praeger, pp. 167–95.
39.
MarinoKenneth E.1982. “Structural Correlates of Affirmative Action Compliance.”Journal of Management, Vol. 8, No. 1 (Spring), pp. 75–93.
40.
McDonaldCharles J.1987. “The AFL-CIO's Blue-print for the Future—A Progress Report.” In Industrial Relations Research Association, Proceedings of the Thirty-Ninth Annual Meeting.Madison, Wis.: IRRA, pp. 276–82.
41.
McDonaldCharles J.1992. “U.S. Union Membership in Future Decades: A Trade Unionist's Perspective.”Industrial Relations, Vol. 31, No. 1 (Winter), pp. 13–30.
42.
MillerJ. James. 1961. “Legal and Economic History of the Secondary Boycott.”Labor Law Journal, Vol. 12, No. 8 (August), pp. 751–59.
43.
MochMichael K.1976. “Structure and Organizational Resource Allocation.”Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 4 (December), pp. 661–74.
44.
NelsonDaniel. 1974. “The Beginning of the Sit-Down Era: The Reminiscences of Rex Murray.”Labor History, Vol. 15, No. 1 (Winter), pp. 89–97.
45.
OswaldRudy, and KrashevskiRick. 1981. “Union Structure.” In SternJames L. and DennisBarbara, eds., Trade Unionism in the United States: A Symposium in Honor of Jack Barbash. Madison, Wis.: Industrial Relations Research Association, pp. 5–28.
46.
PerryCharles R.1987. Union Corporate Campaigns. Philadelphia: Industrial Research Unit, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.
47.
PfefferJeffrey. 1981. Power in Organizations. New York: Pitman.
48.
RachleffPeter. 1993. Hard-Pressed in the Heartland: The Hormel Strike and the Future of the Labor Movement. Boston: South End Press.
49.
ReutherVictor G.1976. The Brothers Reuther. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
50.
RussellRobert D., and RussellCraig J.. 1992. “An Examination of the Effects of Organizational Norms, Organizational Structure, and Environmental Uncertainty on Entrepreneurial Strategy.”Journal of Management, Vol. 18, No. 4 (December), pp. 639–56.
51.
ScheckChristine L., and BohlanderGeorge W.. 1990. “The Planning Practices of Labor Organizations: A National Study.”Labor Studies Journal, Vol. 15, No. 4 (Winter), pp. 69–84.
52.
SeeberRonald L.1984. “The Expansion of National Union Jurisdictions 1955–1982.” Unpublished manuscript. Ithaca, N.Y.: New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University.
StraussGeorge. 1993. “Issues in Union Structure.”Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 12. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, pp. 1–49.
55.
StraussGeorge. 1991. “Union Democracy.” In StraussGeorgeGallagherDaniel G., and FioritoJack, eds., The State of the Unions. Madison, Wis.: Industrial Relations Research Association, pp. 201–36.
56.
StraussGeorge. 1977. “Union Government in the United States: Research Past and Future.”Industrial Relations, Vol. 16, No. 2 (May), pp. 215–42.
57.
ThompsonRuth K.1988. “Union Use of Public Proxy Resolutions.”Labor Studies Journal, Vol. 13, No. 3 (Fall), pp. 40–57.
58.
TushmanMichael L.1977. “Special Boundary Roles in the Innovation Process.”Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 22, No. 4 (December), pp. 587–605.
59.
TushmanMichael L.NewmanWilliam H., and RomanelliElaine. 1986. “Convergence and Upheaval: Managing the Unsteady Pace of Organizational Evolution.”California Management Review, Vol. 29, No. 1 (Fall), pp. 1–16.
60.
TushmanMichael L.O'ReillyCharles, and NadlerDavid A., eds. 1989. The Management of Organizations. New York: Harper & Row.
61.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 1980. Directory of National Unions and Employee Associations, 1979. Bulletin 2079. Washington, D.C.: GPO.
62.
WarnerMalcolm. 1975. “Unions as Complex Organizations.”Relations Industrielles, Vol. 30, No. 2 (April), pp. 43–59.
63.
ZaltmanGeraldDuncanRobert, and HolbekJonny. 1973. Innovations and Organizations. New York: Wiley.
64.
ZmudRobert W.1982. “Diffusion of Modern Software Practices: Influence of Centralization and Formalization.”Management Science, Vol. 28, No. 12 (December), pp. 1421–31.
