This study of successor unions to the official unions in the former USSR, which uses data from 1992–93 field work and surveys of union leaders, demonstrates that, contrary to the claims of some observers, successor unions are capable of reform. Compared to the old unions, the successor unions examined in this study were more decentralized and democratic, placed more emphasis on job-related concerns, and had leaders with more varied profiles and compensation. The author finds no relationship between leaders' membership in the Communist Party and either their political beliefs or the probability of their being newly elected leaders. Union membership was far higher in successor unions than in the new, alternative unions. Tempering these indications of reformation, however, is some evidence of institutional inertia and persistence of privilege in the successor unions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AFL-CIO. 1993. Report to the Board of Directors, Free Trade Union Institute, 1991–1992. Washington, D.C.
2.
AllenV. L.1954. Power in Trade Unions. New York: Longmans.
3.
AshTimothy N., and HarePaul G.. 1994. “Privatization in the Russian Federation: Changing Enterprise Behavior in the Transition Period.”Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 18, pp. 619–34.
4.
BimAlexanderJonesDerek C., and WeisskopfTom. 1993. “Hybrid Forms of Enterprise in Russia and the Former USSR.”Comparative Economic Systems, Vol. 35, No. 1 (Spring), pp. 1–37.
5.
BimAlexanderJonesDerek C., and WeisskopfTom. 1994. “Privatization in Russia.” In EstrinSaul, ed., Privatization in Central and Eastern Europe. London: Longmans.
6.
BlanchflowerD., and FreemanR.. 1992. “Unionism in the United States and Other Advanced OECD Countries.” In BognanoM. and KleinerM., Labor Market Institutions and the Future Role of Unions. Cambridge: Blackwell.
7.
BlasiJoseph. 1994. “Corporate Ownership and Corporate Governance in Russia: 1994 Findings.” Presented at the 1995 IRRA meetings, Washington, D.C. Jan. 8. Forthcoming in Proceedings of the IRRA, 1995.
8.
BorisovVadimFairbrotherPeter, and ClarkeSimon. 1994. “Is There Room for an Independent Trade Unionism in Russia? Trade Unionism in the Russian Aviation Industry.”British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 32, No. 3 (September), pp. 359–78.
9.
BrownE. C.1966. Soviet Trade Unions and Labor Relations. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
10.
CharupJoshua, and WebsterLelia. 1993. Private Manufacturing Firms in St. Petersburg. Mimeo, The World Bank.
11.
ClarkeS.FairbrotherP.BurawoyM., and KrotovP.. 1993. What About the Workers?London: Verso.
12.
CleggHugh. 1976. Trade Unionism Under Collective Bargaining. Oxford: Blackwell.
13.
EdelsteinJ. David, and WarnerMalcolm. 1976. Comparative Union Democracy. New York: Wiley.
14.
FreemanRichard. 1992. “What Direction for Labor-Market Institutions in Eastern and Central Europe?” Forthcoming in BlanchardO., ed., The Transition in Eastern Europe, NBER.
15.
GendlerGrigorii, and GildingershMarina. 1992. “Unemployment in St. Petersburg.”RFE/RL, Vol. 1, No. 40 (October 9), pp. 57–59.
16.
GerchikovVladimir. 1992. “Business Democracy: Work Collective Councils and Trade Unions.” In SzellG., ed., Labor Relations in Transition in Eastern Europe. Berlin: de Gruyter.
17.
GordonLeonid A.1993–94. “Russian Workers and Democracy: A Study of Mineworker Activists in the Kuzbass.”International Journal of Sociology, Vol. 23, No. 4 (Winter), pp. 3–99.
18.
GordonLeonid, and KlopovE.. 1992. “The Workers' Movement in a Post Socialist Perspective.” In SilvermanBertram, Labor and Democracy in the Transition to a Market System. New York: Sharpe, pp. 27–52.
19.
GrancelliBruno. 1988. Soviet Management and Labor Relations. Boston: Allen & Unwin.
20.
JonesDerek C.1992. “The Transformation of Labor Unions in Eastern Europe: The Case of Bulgaria.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 45, No. 3 (April), pp. 452–70.
21.
JonesDerek C.1994. “The Nature, Determinants, and Effects of Corporate Governance: Evidence from Bulgaria.” Working Paper 94/9, Hamilton College, Department of Economics.
22.
JonesDerek C.1995a. “Employee Participation During the Early Stages of Transition: Evidence from Bulgaria.”Economic and Industrial Democracy, Vol. 16, pp. 111–35.
23.
JonesDerek C.1995b. “Successor Unions and the Evolution of Industrial Relations in Former Communist Countries.” Working Paper 95/1, Hamilton College, Department of Economics. Forthcoming in Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations.
24.
KatzHarry C.KuruvillaSarosh, and TurnerLowell. 1993. “Trade Unions and Collective Bargaining: Suggestions for Emerging Democracies in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Europe.” In SilvermanBertram, Labor and Democracy in the Transition to a Market System. New York: Sharpe, pp. 187–208.
25.
MurrellPeter. 1992. “Evolution in Economics and in the Economic Reform of the Centrally Planned Economies.” In ClagueChristopher and RausserGordon C., eds., The Emergence of Market Economies in Eastern Europe. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.
26.
PravdaAlex, and RubleBlair. 1986. Trade Unions in Communist States. London: Allen & Unwin.
27.
RubleBlair. 1981. Soviet Trade Unions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
RutlandPeter. 1988. “The Role of the Communist Party on the Soviet Shopfloor.”Studies in Comparative Communism, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 25–44.
29.
SilvermanBertramVogtRobert, and YanowitchMurray, eds. 1992. Labor and Democracy in the Transition to a Market System. New York: Sharpe.
30.
SilvermanBertramVogtRobert, and YanowitchMurray, eds. 1993. Double Shift. New York: Sharpe.
31.
SliderDarrell. 1987. “The Brigade System in Soviet Industry.”Soviet Studies, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 388–405.
32.
StandingGuy. 1992. Papers presented at the ILO Conference on Industrial Restructuring, Moscow and St. Petersburg, October. (Obtainable from ILO, CEET, Budapest.)
33.
StarkDavid. 1992. “Path Dependence and Privatization: Strategies for East and Central Europe.”East European Politics and Societies, Vol. 6, pp. 17–54.
34.
SwiatowskiAndrzej. 1994. “Transformation of Industrial Relations in Central and Eastern Europe.” Mimeo, Jagiellonski University, Poland.
35.
TaftP.1962. The Structure and Government of Trade Unions. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
36.
TemkinaAnna. 1992. “The Workers' Movement in Leningrad, 1986–91.”Soviet Studies, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 209–36.
37.
Van AttaDon. 1989. “A Critical Examination of Brigades in the USSR.”Economic and Industrial Democracy, Vol. 10, pp. 329–40.
