The author finds evidence that the past occurrence of a spell of insured unemployment lengthens the duration of future spells. Descriptive statistics from Canadian administrative data covering mid-1971 to early 1990 suggest that unemployment insurance (UI) claimants tend to spend a longer and longer time collecting benefits with each additional claim they make. This finding contradicts the implication of static neoclassical models that successive UI spells should be of the same length. The author hypothesizes that the stigma attached to receiving unemployment benefits erodes with each new UI claim an individual files.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AtkinsonA. B.MicklewrightJohn. 1985. Unemployment Benefits and Unemployment Duration: A Study of Men in the United Kingdom in the 1970s. London: Suntory-Toyota International Centre for Economics and Related Disciplines, The London School of Economics and Political Science.
2.
GrossmanBaldwinJean. 1989. “The Work Disincentive Effect of Extended Unemployment Compensation: Recent Evidence.”Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 71, No. 1 (February), pp. 159–64.
3.
BeachC. M.L.KaliskiS. F., 1983. “The Impact of the 1979 Unemployment Insurance Amendments.”Canadian Public Policy, Vol. 9, No. 2 (June), pp. 164–73.
4.
BlanchardOlivier Jean. 1990. “Unemployment: Getting the Questions Right—and Some of the Answers.” In DrèzeJacques H.BeanCharles R., eds., Europe's Unemployment Problem. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
5.
CorakMiles. 1992a. “Repeat Users of the Unemployment Insurance Program.”Canadian Economic Observer. Statistics Canada, Catalogue No. 11-010 (January), pp. 3. 1–3.25.
6.
CorakMiles. 1992b. “Longitudinal Patterns in the Duration of Unemployment Insurance Claims in Canada.” Research Paper No. 47, Analytical Studies Branch, Statistics Canada.
7.
CorakMiles. 1992c. “The Duration of Unemployment Insurance Payments.” Working Paper No. 42, Economic Council of Canada.
8.
CorakMiles. 1993. “Unemployment Insurance Once Again: The Incidence of Repeat Participation in the Canadian UI Program.”Canadian Public Policy, Vol. 19, No. 2 (June), pp. 162–76.
9.
DickensWilliam T.LangKevin. 1988. “The Reemergence of Segmented Labor Market Theory.”American Economic Reviexo, Vol. 78, No. 2 (May), pp. 129–34.
10.
EllwoodDavid T.1982. “Teenage Unemployment: Permanent Scars or Temporary Blemishes?” In FreemanRichard B.WiseDavid A., eds., The Youth Labor Market Problem: Its Nature, Causes, and Consequences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
FortinPierre. 1984. “Unemployment Insurance Meets the Classical Labor Supply Model.”Economics Letters, Vol. 14, Nos. 2–3, pp. 275–81.
12.
GlendayGrahamJenkinsGlenn P., 1981a. “The Unemployment Experience of Individuals.”Ottawa: Labor Market Development Task Force, Technical Study14.
13.
GlendayGrahamJenkinsGlenn P., 1981b. “Patterns of Duration of Employment and Unemployment.”Ottawa: Labor Market Development Task Force, Technical Study12.
14.
HamJohn C.ReaSamuel A.Jr.1987. “Unemployment Insurance and Male Unemployment Duration in Canada.”Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 5, No. 3 (July), pp. 325–53.
15.
HeckmanJames J.BorjasGeorge J., 1980. “Does Unemployment Cause Future Unemployment? Definitions, Questions, and Answers from a Continuous Time Model of Heterogeneity and State Dependence.”Economica, Vol. 47, No. 187 (August), pp. 247–83.
16.
KatzLawrence F.MeyerBruce D., 1990a. “Unemployment Insurance, Recall Expectations, and Unemployment Outcomes.”Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 105, No. 4 (November), pp. 974–1002.
17.
KatzLawrence F.MeyerBruce D., 1990b. “The Impact of the Potential Duration of Unemployment Benefits on the Duration of Unemployment.”Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 41, No. 1 (February), pp. 45–72.
18.
KeilM. W.SymonsJ. S. V., 1990. “An Analysis of Canadian Unemployment.”Canadian Public Policy, Vol. 16, No. 1 (March), pp. 1–16.
19.
LancasterT.1979. “Econometric Methods for the Duration of Unemployment.”Econometrica, Vol. 48, No. 4 (July), pp. 939–56.
20.
LancasterT.NickellS.J., 1980. “The Analysis of Re-Employment Probabilities for the Unemployed.”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, Vol. 143, Part 2, pp. 141–65.
21.
MagunSunder. 1982. “Unemployment Experience in Canada: A Five Year Longitudinal Study.” Unpublished mimeo, Economic Council of Canada.
22.
MilbourneRoss D.PurvisDouglas D.ScoonesWilliam D., 1991. “Unemployment Insurance and Unemployment Dynamics.”Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol. 24, No. 4 (November), pp. 804–26.
23.
MoffittRobert. 1985. “Unemployment Insurance and the Distribution of Unemployment Spells.”Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 28, No. 1 (April), pp. 85–101.
24.
MoffittRobertNicholsonWalter. 1982. “The Effect of Unemployment Insurance on Unemployment: The Case of Federal Supplemental Benefits.”Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 64, No. 1 (February), pp. 1–11.
25.
MoorthyVivek. 1989–90. “Unemployment in Canada and the United States: The Role of Unemployment Insurance Benefits.”Federal Reserve Bank of New York Quarterly Review, Winter, pp. 48–61.
26.
NickellS.J.1979. “Estimating the Probability of Leaving Unemployment.”Econometrica, Vol. 42, No. 5 (September), pp. 1249–66.
27.
PhippsShelley. 1990a. “Quantity-Constrained Household Responses to UI Reform.”Economic Journal, Vol. 100, No. 399 (March), pp. 124–40.
28.
PhippsShelley. 1990b. “The Impact of the Unemployment Insurance Reform of 1990 on Single Earners.”Canadian Public Policy, Vol. 16, No. 3 (September), pp. 252–61.
29.
RuhmChristopher J.1991. “Are Workers Permanently Scarred by Job Displacements?”American Economic Review, Vol. 81, No. 1 (March), pp. 319–24.
30.
WillisRobert J.1982. “Comment.” In FreemanRichard B.WiseDavid A., eds., The Youth Labor Market Problem: Its Nature, Causes, and Consequences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
