The author reviews evidence that the bargaining structure is becoming more decentralized in Sweden, Australia, the former West Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom, and the United States, although in somewhat different degrees and ways from country to country. He then examines the various hypotheses that have been offered to explain this significant trend. Shifts in bargaining power, as well as the diversification of corporate and worker interests, have played a part in this change, he concludes, but work reorganization has been more influential still. He also explores how the roles of central unions and corporate industrial relations staffs are challenged by bargaining structure decentralization, and discusses the research gaps on this subject that need to be filled.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArthurJeffrey B.1992. “The Link Between Business Strategy and Industrial Relations Systems in American Steel Minimills.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 45, No. 3 (April), pp. 488–506.
2.
BlanchflowerDavidFreemanRichard. 1992. “Unionism in the U.S. and Other Advanced OECD Countries.”Industrial Relations, Vol. 31, No. 1 (Winter), pp. 56–79.
3.
BrayMark. 1991. “Australian Unions and Economic Restructuring.” Unpublished paper, Department of Industrial Relations, University of Sydney.
4.
BrownWilliam A., ed. 1981. The Changing Contours of British Industrial Relations: A Survey of Manufacturing Industry. Oxford: Blackwell.
5.
BrownWilliam A.WalshJanet. 1991. “Pay Determination in Britain in the 1980s: The Anatomy of Decentralization.”Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 44–59.
6.
BuddJohn W.1992. “The Determinants and Extent of UAW Pattern Bargaining.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 45, No. 3 (April), pp. 523–39.
7.
CallusRonMoreheadAlisonCullyMarkBuchananJohn. 1991. “Industrial Relations at Work: The Australian Workplace Industrial Relations Survey.”Commonwealth Department of Industrial Relations, Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
8.
CappelliPeter. 1985. “Competitive Pressures and Labor Relations in the Airline Industry.”Industrial Relations, Vol. 24 (Fall), pp. 316–38.
9.
ChandlerAlfred D.1962. Strategy and Structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
10.
CommonsJohn R.1909. “American Shoemakers, 1648–1895: A Sketch of Industrial Evolution.”Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 24 (November), pp. 39–81.
11.
Cutcher-GershenfeldJoel. 1991. “The Impact on Economic Performance of a Transformation in Workplace Relations.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 44, No 2 (January), pp. 241–60.
12.
DabscheckBrahamNilandJohn. 1981. Industrial Relations in Australia. Sydney: George Allen and Unwin.
DeatonD. R.BeaumontP. B., 1980. “The Determinants of Bargaining Structure: Some Large Scale Survey Evidence for Britain.”British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 18 (July), pp. 202–16.
15.
EatonAdrienne E.VoosPaula B., 1992. “Unions and Contemporary Innovations in Work Organizations, Compensation, and Employee Participation.” In MishelL.VoosP., eds., Unions and Economic Competitiveness. Washington, D.C.: Economic Policy Institute, pp. 173–216.
16.
EricksonChristopher L.1990. “Union Wage Determination in Manufacturing in the 1980s: Three Empirical Investigations.” Ph.D. diss., MIT, pp. 10–170.
17.
EricksonChristopher L.1992. “Wage Rule Formation in the Aerospace Industry.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 45, No. 3 (April), pp. 507–22.
18.
European Industrial Relations Review. 1991. “Debate on Labour Costs.” No. 205 (February), pp. 27–28.
19.
European Industrial Relations Review. 1992a. “The Rise and Fall of Centralized Bargaining.” No. 220 (April), pp. 20–22.
20.
European Industrial Relations Review. 1992b. “Revolt of the Mittelstand—Pressures for Bargaining Reform.” No. 221 (June), pp. 12–14.
21.
European Industrial Relations Review. 1992c. “Collective Bargaining in 1991.” No. 227 (December), pp. 20–24.
22.
FlanaganRobert J.SoskiceDavid W.UlmanLloyd. 1983. Unionism, Economic Stabilization, and Income Policies: European Experience. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
23.
GreenbergDavid H.1967. “The Structure of Collective Bargaining and Some of Its Determinants.” In SomersGerald G., ed., Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Winter Meeting. Madison, Wis.: Industrial Relations Research Association. pp. 343–53.
24.
HanckeBob. Forthcoming. “Trade Union Membership and Decline in Europe 1960–1990—Rediscovering the Locals.”British Journal of Industrial Relations.
25.
HendricksWallace E.KahnLawrence M., 1982. “The Determinants of Bargaining Structure in U.S. Manufacturing Industries.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 35, No. 2 (January), pp. 181–95.
26.
Industrial Relations Review and Report. 1989. “Decentralized Bargaining in Practice: 1.” Report 454. December, pp. 5–10.
27.
Industrial Relations Review and Report. 1990. “Decentralized Bargaining in Practice: 2.” Report 457. February, pp. 5–6.
28.
KatzHarry C.1988. “Policy Debates over Work Reorganization in North American Unions.” In HymanRichardStreeckWolfgang, eds., New Technology and Industrial Relations: International Experiences. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 220–32.
29.
KatzHarry C.KeefeJeffrey H., 1992. “Collective Bargaining and Industrial Relations Outcomes: The Causes and Consequences of Diversity.” In LewinD.MitchellO.ShererP., eds., Research Frontiers in Industrial Relations and Human Resources. Madison, Wis.: Industrial Relations Research Association, pp. 43–76.
30.
KatzHarry C.KochanThomas A., 1992. An Introduction to Collective Bargaining and Industrial Relations. New York: McGraw Hill.
31.
KatzHarry C.KochanThomas A.KeefeJeffrey H., 1987. “Industrial Relations and Productivity in the U.S. Automobile Industry.”Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 3. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution, pp. 685–728.
32.
KatzHarry C.MeltzNoah. 1989. “Changing Work Practices and Productivity in the Auto Industry: A U.S.–Canada Comparison.” in GrantMichel, ed., Proceedings of the 26th Conference of the Canadian Industrial Relations Association. Quebec: University of Laval Press, pp. 384–96.
33.
KatzHarry C.MeltzNoah. 1991. “Profit Sharing and Auto Workers' Earnings: The United States vs. Canada.”Relations Industrielles, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 513–30.
34.
KatzHarry C.SabelCharles F., 1985. “Industrial Relations and Industrial Adjustment in the Car Industry.”Industrial Relations, Vol. 24 (Fall), pp. 295–315.
35.
LansburyRussell D.1993. “Changing Patterns of Industrial Relations and Human Resources in the Australian Automotive Industry: Towards Transformation?” Unpublished paper presented at the meeting of the International Motor Vehicle Program, M.I.T., June 1.
36.
LansburyRussellNilandJohn. 1992. “Recent Trends in Industrial Relations and Human Resource Policy and Practice: The Australian Experience.” Paper presented at the International IR/HR Project Meeting, Paris, June 22–24.
37.
LockeRichard M.1992. “The Decline of the National Union in Italy: Lessons for Comparative Industrial Relations Theory.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 45, No. 2 (January), pp. 229–49.
38.
LockeRichard M. Forthcoming. Re-building the Economy: Local Politics and Industrial Change in Contemporary Italy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
39.
MackenJames J.1989. Award Restructuring. Sydney: The Federation Press.
40.
MarginsonPaul. 1988. Beyond the Workplace: Managing Industrial Relations in Multi-Establishment Enterprises. Oxford: Blackwell.
41.
MarginsonPaulSissonKeith. 1990. “Single-Table Talk.”Personnel Management, May, pp. 46–49.
42.
MathewsJohn. 1989. Tools of Change: New Technology and the Democratization of Work. Sydney: Pluto Press.
43.
MillwardN.StevensM., 1986. British Workplace Industrial Relations 1980–1984. Aldershot: Gower.
44.
MillwardN., 1992. Workplace Industrial Relations in Transition. Brookfield: Dartmouth University Press.
45.
ParkerMikeSlaughterJane. 1988. Choosing Sides: Unions and the Team Concept. Boston: South End Press.
46.
PontussonJonasSwensonPeter. 1992. “Markets, Production, Institutions, and Politics: Why Swedish Employers Have Abandoned the Swedish Model.” Paper presented at the Eighth International Conference of Europeanists, The Council for European Studies, Chicago, March 27–29.
47.
PurcellJohnAhlstrandBruce. 1989. “Corporate Strategy and the Management of Employee Relations in the Multi-divisional Company.”British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 27, No. 3 (November), pp. 396–417.
48.
ReadyKathryn J.1990. “Is Pattern Bargaining Dead?.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 43, No. 2 (January), pp. 272–79.
49.
RegaliaIdaReginiMarino. 1992. “Comparative IR/HR Research Network-Italian Report.” Paper presented at the International IR/HR Project Meeting, Paris, June 22–24.
50.
RimmerMalcolmVerevisChrissie, eds. 1990. Progress of Award Restructuring: Case Studies. Monograph 28. Kensington, NSW, Australia: Industrial Relations Research Centre.
51.
SissonKeith. 1992. “Change and Continuity in UK Industrial Relations: ‘Strategic Choice’ or ‘Muddling Through’?” Paper presented at the International IR/HR Project Meeting, Paris, June 22–24.
52.
StoreyJohn. 1992. Developments in the Management of Human Resources: An Analytical Review. Oxford: Blackwell.
53.
StreeckWolfgang. 1984a. Industrial Relations in West Germany: A Case Study of the Car Industry. New York: St. Martin's.
54.
StreeckWolfgang. 1984b. “Neo-Corporatist Industrial Relations and the Economic Crisis in West Germany.” In GoldthorpeJohn H., ed., Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 291–314.
55.
StreeckWolfgang. 1991. “More Uncertainties: German Unions Facing 1992.”Industrial Relations, Vol. 30, No. 3 (Fall), pp. 317–49.
56.
SwensonPeter. 1989. Fair Shares: Unions, Pay and Politics in Sweden and West Germany. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
57.
SwordGreg. 1992. “Enterprise Bargains—The Framework.” In CrobyMichaelEassonMichael, eds., What Should Unions Do?Leichardt, NSW, Australia: Pluto Press, pp. 257–64.
58.
ThelenKathleen A.1991. Union of Parts: Labor Politics in Postwar Germany. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
59.
ThelenKathleen A.1992. “The Changing Character of Industrial Relations in Contemporary Europe.” Unpublished paper presented at the workshop, “A New Europe: Rethinking the Collective Response to Change,”Center for European Studies, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass., December 11–13.
60.
TurnerLowell. 1991. Democracy at Work: Changing World Market and the Future of Unions. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
61.
UlmanLloyd. 1974. “Connective and Competitive Bargaining.”Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 21, No. 2 (June), pp. 77–109.
62.
UlmanLloyd. 1955. The Rise of the National Trade Union. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
63.
WeberArnold B.1961. “Introduction.” in WeberArnold, ed., The Structure of Collective Bargaining. New York: The Free Press, pp. xv–xxxii.
64.
WilliamsonOliver. 1968. “Wage Rates as a Barrier to Entry: The Pennington Case in Perspective.”Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 82, No. 1 (February), pp. 85–116.
65.
WindmullerJohn. 1987. Collective Bargaining in Industrialized Market Economies: A Reappraisal. Geneva: International Labour Office.
66.
WindolfPaul. 1989. “Productivity Coalitions and the Future of Corporatism.”Industrial Relations, Vol. 28 (Winter), pp. 1–20.
