This study examines the failure of the effort by the European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC) and its national affiliates to obtain a uniform and binding set of regulations for Europeanwide collective bargaining within the European Community's 1989 Charter of Fundamental Social Rights. The trade unions were prompted to act by the program to create a single European market by the end of 1992. The author argues that labor's weak position economically and politically in the late 1980s and early 1990s, particularly at the national level, prevented the ETUC and its member confederations from winning support for their version of the Social Charter, since they could neither credibly threaten recalcitrant governments with social unrest nor convincingly offer them electoral aid.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmorosoBruno. 1990. “Development and Crisis of the Scandinavian Model of Labour Relations in Denmark.” In BaglioniGuido and CrouchColin, eds., European Industrial Relations in the 1980s. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage, pp. 71–96.
2.
AubryMartine. 1989. Pour une Europe sociale: Rapport au ministre du Travail, de l'Emploi et de la Formation professionnelle. Collection des rapports officiels. Paris: la documentation française.
3.
BaglioniGuido. 1990. “Industrial Relations in Europe in the 1980s.” In BaglioniGuido and CrouchColin, eds., European Industrial Relations in the 1980s. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage, pp. 1–41.
4.
BaldwinRichard. 1989. “The Growth Effects of 1992.”Economic Policy, No. 9 (October), pp. 247–81.
5.
BlankMichael, and KöppenMargit. 1990. “Europäischer Binnenmarkt.” In KittnerMichael, ed., Gewerkschaftsjahrbuch 1990. Cologne: Bund, pp. 607–28.
6.
Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie and Deutscher Gewerkschaftsbund. 1989. “Die Chancen des europäischen Binnenmarktes nutzen. Gemeinsame Erklärung des Bundesverbandes der Deutschen Industrie und des Deutschen Gewerkschaftsbundes vom 20. Juni 1989.”DGB-InformationsdienstNo. 11(August 1, 1989).
7.
CecchiniPaolo. 1988. The European Challenge, 1992: The Benefits of a Single Market. Aldershot, England: Wildwood House.
8.
Commission of the European Communities. 1988. Social Europe: The Social Dimension of the International Market. Commission Working Paper SEC (88) 148 final. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities (CEC).
9.
Commission of the European Communities. 1989. Communication from the Commission Concerning Its Action Programme Relating to the Community Charter of Basic Social Rights for Workers. COM (89) 568. Brussels: CEC.
10.
Confédération Française Démocratique du Travail. 1988. 41e Congrés Confédéral. Paris: CFDT.
11.
CrispoJohn. 1967. International Unionism: A Study in Canadian-American Relations. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Company of Canada.
12.
CrouchColin. 1990. “United Kingdom: The Rejection of Compromise.” In BaglioniGuido and CrouchColin, eds., European Industrial Relations in the 1980s. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage, pp. 326–55.
13.
Deutscher Gewerkschaftsbund. 1989a. “Für ein soziales Europa. Prioritäten der Gewerkschaften für die deutsche EG-Präsidentschaft.” Beschluss des Geschäftsführenden Bundesvorstandes vom 07. Dezember 1987. In Gewerkschaftsbund-BundesvorstandDeutscher, ed., Europas Binnenmarkt. Beschlüsse und Entschliessungen des DGB/EGB. Düsseldorf: DGB, pp. 5–18.
14.
Deutscher Gewerkschaftsbund. 1989b. Europas Wirtschaft. Kritische Stellungen/Perspektiven. Düsseldorf: DGB.
15.
Deutscher Gewerkschaftsbund. 1989c. Europas Binnenmarkt. Beschlüsse und Entschliessungen des DGB/EGB. Düsseldorf: DGB.
16.
European Trade Union Confederation. 1988a. Creating the European Social Dimension in the Internal Market: European Social Programme. Adopted by the Executive Committee, February 11–12. Brussels: ETUC.
17.
European Trade Union Confederation. 1988b. Resolutions, Sixth Statutory Congress, Stockholm, May 9–13. Brussels: ETUC.
18.
European Trade Union Confederation. 1988c. Community Charter of Fundamental Social Rights. Adopted by the Executive Committee, December 1–2. Brussels: ETUC.
19.
European Trade Union Institute (ETUI). 1987. European Trade Union Confederation: Profile of the ETUC. Brussels: ETUI.
20.
European Trade Union Institute (ETUI). 1988. The Social Dimension of the Internal Market. Second Part: Workers' Rights in European Companies, Info 26. Brussels: ETUI.
21.
GourevitchPeter. 1986. Politics in Hard Times: Comparative Responses to International Economic Crisis. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
22.
Industriegewerkschaft Chemie-Papier-Keramik. 1989a. Auf dem Weg zum europäischen Binnenmarkt. Hanover, Germany: Buchdruckwerkstätten Hannover.
23.
Industriegewerkschaft Chemie-Papier-Keramik. 1989a. Ergebnisse der Tagung zum EG-Binnenmarkt. 3./4. März in Königswinter. Hanover, Germany: Buchdruckwerkstätten Hannover.
24.
Industriegewerkschaft Metall. 1989. Geschäftsbericht 1986 bis 1988 des Vorstandes der Industriegewerkschaft Metall für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Frankfurt am Main: Union-Druckerei.
25.
KaneElimane, and MarsdenDavid. 1988. “The Future of Trade Unionism in Industrialized Societies.”Labour and Society, Vol. 13, No. 2 (April), pp. 109–24.
26.
KöpkeGünter. 1988. “Die wirtschaftlichen und sozialen Probleme des europäischen Binnenmarktes aus der Sicht der europäischen Gewerkschaften.” In StiftungFriedrich Ebert, ed., Auf dem Weg zum europäischen Binnenmarkt. Bonn: FES, pp. 7–20.
27.
KöpkeGünter. 1990. “Tarifpolitische Perspektiven im europäischen Binnenmarkt: Hemnisse und Chancen.”Gewerkschaftliche Monatshefte, Vol. 41, No. 12 (December), pp. 757–66.
28.
LangKlaus, and SauerJoachim. 1989. “Wege zu einer europäischen Tarifpolitik.” In SteinkühlerFranz, ed., Europa '92. Industriestandort oder sozialer Lebensraum. Hamburg: VSA.
29.
LangePeter, and VannicelliMaurizio. 1982. “Strategy Under Stress: The Italian Union Movement and the Italian Crisis in Developmental Perspective.” In LangePeterRossGeorge, and VannicelliMaurizio, eds., Unions, Change and Crisis: French and Italian Union Strategy and the Political Economy, 1945–1980. London: George Allen & Unwin, pp. 95–206.
LockeRichard M. Forthcoming. “Strategic Choice and Its Constraints: Italian Labor Politics in Transition.” In GoldenMiriam and PontussonJonas, eds., Union Politics in Comparative Perspective. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
32.
MarkovitsAndrei S.1986. The Politics of the West German Trade Unions: Strategies of Class and Interest Representation in Growth and Crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
MoravcsikAndrew. 1991. “Negotiating the Single European Act: National Interests and Conventional Statecraft in the European Community.”International Organization, Vol. 45, No. 1 (Winter), pp. 19–56.
34.
MortonDesmond. 1984. Working People: An Illustrated History of the Canadian Labour Movement. Toronto: Deneau.
NorthrupHerbert R.CampbellDuncan C., and SlowinskiBetty J.. 1988. “Multinational Union-Management Consultation in Europe: Resurgence in the 1980s?”International Labour Review, Vol. 127, No. 5 (November—December), pp. 525–43.
37.
NorthrupHerbert R., and RowanRichard L.. 1979. Multilateral Collective Bargaining Attempts: The Record, the Cases, and the Prospects. Multinational Industrial Relations Series, no. 6. Philadelphia: Industrial Research Unit, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.
38.
NugentNeill. 1989. The Government and Politics of the European Community. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
39.
OechslinJean-Jacques. 1989. “Unity Through Dialogue.”ILO-Information, Vol. 17, No. 1 (February), p. 4.
40.
RappeHermann. 1989. “Die europäischen Gerwerkschaften wollen und werden an der sozialen Gestaltung mitarbeiten.” In WeberHermann, ed., Für eine Politik der Vernunft. Beiträge zu Demokratie und Sozialstaat. Cologne: Bund, pp. 387–94.
41.
SandholtzWayne, and ZysmanJohn. 1989. “Recasting the European Bargain.”World Politics, Vol. 42, No. 1 (October), pp. 95–128.
42.
SciarraSilvana. 1989. “Industrial Relations, Labour Law and Employment. Regulating the Unions: An Issue for 1992.” Public Lecture, University of Warwick, May 30. Warwick, United Kingdom: Warwick University Press.
43.
SegrestinDenis. 1990. “Recent Changes in France.” In BaglioniGuido and CrouchColin, eds., European Industrial Relations in the 1980s. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage, pp. 97–126.
44.
SpineuxArmand. 1990. “Trade Unionism in Belgium: The Difficulties of a Major Renovation.” In BaglioniGuido and CrouchColin, eds., European Industrial Relations in the 1980s. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage, pp. 42–70.
45.
TeaguePaul. 1989a. “Constitution or Regime? The Social Dimension to the 1992 Project.”British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 27, No. 3 (November), pp. 310–29.
46.
TeaguePaul. 1989b. “The British TUC and the European Community.”Millennium, Vol. 18, No. 1 (Spring), pp. 29–45.
47.
Textil-Bekleidung (monthly newspaper of the Textile and Apparel Workers' Union, Gewerkschaft Textil-Bekleidung). Various dates. Düsseldorf.
48.
Trades Union Congress. 1988a. Maximising the Benefits, Minimising the Costs: TUC Report on Europe 1992. London: TUC Publications.
49.
Trades Union Congress. 1988b. Report of the 120th Annual Trades Union Congress. Held in the International Centre, Bournemouth, September 5–9. London: TUC Publications.
50.
Trades Union Congress. 1989a. Europe 1992: Issues for Joint Examination—A Trade Union Checklist. London: TUC Publications.
51.
Trades Union Congress. 1989b. Europe 1992: Progress Report on Trade Union Objectives. London: TUC Publications.
52.
Trades Union Congress. 1989c. Union-file on Europe: A Workbook for Trade Unionists. London: TUC Publications.
53.
TrentinBruno. 1989. “Europa im Programm der CGIL.” In SteinkühlerFranz, ed., Europa '92. Industriestandort oder sozialer Lebensraum. Hamburg: VSA, pp. 183–94.
54.
TudykaKurt P.1988. “Crisis Situation for Multinational Corporation Trade Union Councils: Is the Concern-Oriented Strategy of the Trade Unions Toward Multilateral Corporations Dead?” In SpyropoulosGeorges, ed., Trade Unions Today and Tomorrow, Vol. 1, Trade Unions in a Changing Europe. Maastrict, The Netherlands: Presses inter-universitaires européenes, pp. 219–29.
55.
TyszkiewiczZygmut J. A.1989. European Social Policy: Striking the Right Balance. Brussels: UNICE.
56.
UlmanLloyd. 1966. The Rise of the National Trade Union: The Development and Significance of Its Structure, Governing Institutions, and Economic Policies. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
57.
UlmanLloyd. 1975. “Multinational Unionism: Incentives, Barriers, and Alternatives.”Industrial Relations, Vol. 14, No. 1 (February), pp. 1–31.
58.
VisserJelle. 1988. “Trade Unionism in Western Europe: Present Situation and Prospects.”Labour and Society, Vol. 13, No. 2 (April), pp. 125–82.
59.
VisserJelle. 1989. European Trade Unions in Figures. Deventer, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
60.
VisserJelle. 1990. “Continuity and Change in Dutch Industrial Relations.” In BaglioniGuido and CrouchColin, eds., European Industrial Relations in the 1980s. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage, pp. 199–242.
61.
WedderburnKenneth W. (Lord) 1990. The Social Charter, European Company and Employment Rights: An Outline Agenda. London: Institute of Employment Rights.
62.
WozniakLynne. Forthcoming. “Spanish Unions in Transition and Consolidation.” In GoldenMiriam and PontussonJonas, eds., Union Politics in Comparative Perspective. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
