Using previously unexamined archival material, the author reconstructs one successful historical alternative to the kind of unionism that developed in mass production industries: the “occupational unionism” practiced from the 1900s to the 1960s by waitresses organized into the Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees International Union. This form of employee representation was distinguished by an emphasis on occupational identity, control over the labor supply, portable rights and benefits, and peer determination of performance standards and workplace discipline. The author discusses the implications of this research for the work of labor relations scholars and policy analysts, and speculates that some elements of occupational unionism may hold promise for organizing and representing workers today.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbbottMabel. 1914. “The Waitresses of Seattle.”Life and Labor, Vol. 4 (February), pp. 48–49.
2.
AndrewsJohn B., and BlissW. D. P.. 1911. History of Women in Trade Unions. Vol. 10 of Report on Conditions of Woman and Child Wage-Earners in the United States. Washington, D.C.: GPO.
3.
BarbashJack. 1967. American Unions: Structure, Government, and Politics. New York: Random House.
4.
BellDaniel. 1973. The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. New York: Basic Books.
5.
BensmanDavid. 1985. The Practice of Solidarity: American Hat Finishers in the Nineteenth Century. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
6.
BensonSusan Porter. 1986. Counter Cultures: Saleswomen, Managers, and Customers in American Department Stores, 1890–1940. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
7.
ButlerSuellen, and SkipperJames. 1980. “Waitressing, Vulnerability, and Job Autonomy.”Sociology of Work and Occupations, Vol. 7, No. 4 (November), pp. 487–502.
8.
ButlerSuellen, and SkipperJames. 1983. “Working the Circuit: An Explanation of Employee Turnover in the Restaurant Industry.”Sociological Spectrum, Vol. 3, pp. 19–33.
9.
ButlerSuellen, and SnizekWilliam E.. 1976. “The Waitress-Diner Relationship.”Sociology of Work and Occupations, Vol. 3, No. 2 (May), pp. 209–22.
10.
CobbleDorothy Sue. 1986. “Sisters in the Craft: Waitresses and Their Unions in the Twentieth Century.” Diss., Stanford University.
11.
CooperPatricia. 1987. Once a Cigar Marker: Men, Women, and Work Culture in American Cigar Factories, 1900–1919. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
12.
DericksonAlan. 1989. Workers' Health, Workers' Democracy: The Western Miners' Struggle, 1891–1925. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
13.
DonovanFrances. 1920. The Woman Who Waits. Boston: Gorham Press.
14.
FranklinS. M.1913. “Elizabeth Maloney and the High Calling of the Waitress.”Life and Labor, Vol. 3 (February), pp. 36–40.
15.
GreenJames, and TillyChris. 1987. “Service Unionism: Directions for Organizing.” In DennisBarbara D., ed., Proceedings of the 1987 Spring Meeting (Boston, April 29–May 1, 1987). Madison, Wis.: Industrial Relations Research Association, pp. 486–95.
16.
HeckscherCharles. 1988. The New Unionism: Employee Involvement in the Changing Corporation. New York: Basic Books.
17.
HendersonJohn P.1965. Labor Market Institutions and Wages in the Lodging Industry. East Lansing: Michigan State University.
18.
HorowitzMorris. 1960. The New York Hotel Industry. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
19.
HymanRichard. 1988. “Flexible Specialization: Miracle or Myth?” In HymanRichard and StreeckWolfgang, eds., New Technology and Industrial Relations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
20.
JosephsonMatthew. 1956. Union House, Union Bar: A History of the Hotel and Restaurant Employees and Bartenders International Union, AFL-CIO. New York: Random House.
21.
KatzHarry. 1988. “Policy Debates over Work Reorganization in North American Unions.” In HymanRichard and StreeckWolfgang, eds., New Technology and Industrial Relations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 220–32.
22.
KazinMichael. 1987. Barons of Labor: The San Francisco Building Trades and Union Power in the Progressive Era. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
23.
KennedyVan Dusen. 1955. Nonfactory Unionism and Labor Relations. Berkeley: University of California Institute of Industrial Relations.
24.
KochanThomasKatzHarry, and McKersieRobert. 1986. The Transformation of American Industrial Relations. New York: Basic Books.
25.
LipsetSeymour Martin1956. Union Democracy: The Internal Politics of the Typographical Union. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.
26.
MatthewsLillian. 1913. Women in Trade Unions in San Francisco. Berkeley: University of California Publications in Economics, Vol. 3, No. 1.
27.
MontgomeryDavid. 1987. The Fall of the House of Labor: The Workplace, the State, and American Labor Activism, 1865–1925. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
28.
OlesenVirginia, and KatsuranisFrances. 1978. “Urban Nomads: Women in Temporary Clerical Services.” In StrombergAnn and HarkessShirley, eds., Women Working: Theories and Facts in Perspective. Mountain View, Calif.: Mayfield, pp. 316–38.
29.
PerlmanSelig. 1928. A Theory of the Labor Movement. New York: Macmillan.
30.
PhilipsAnne, and TaylorBarbara. 1980. “Sex and Skill: Notes Toward a Feminist Economics.”Feminist Review, Vol. 6 (October), 79–88.
31.
PioreMichael J., and SabelCharles. 1984. The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity. New York: Basic Books.
32.
SabelCharles, and ZeitlinJonathan. 1985. “Historical Alternatives to Mass Production: Politics, Markets, and Technology in Nineteenth-Century Industrialization.”Past and Present, Vol. 108 (August), pp. 133–76.
33.
SchatzRonald. 1983. The Electrical Workers: A History of Labor at General Electric and Westinghouse, 1920–1960. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
34.
SchlossbergStephen, and FetterSteven M.. 1986. “U.S. Labor Law and the Future of Labor-Management Cooperation.”Labor Law Journal, Vol. 37, No. 9 (September), pp. 595–616.
35.
ScrantonPhilip. 1989. “The Workplace, Technology, and Theory in American Labor History.”International Labor and Working-Class History, Vol. 35 (Spring), pp. 3–22.
36.
SockellDonna. 1989. “The Future of Labor Law: A Mismatch Between Statutory Interpretation and Industrial Reality?”Boston College Law Review, Vol. 30, No. 4 (July), pp. 987–1026.
37.
SockellDonna. 1990. “Research on Labor Law in the 1990's: The Challenge of Defining a Representational Form.” Paper presented to the Second Bargaining Group Conference, Cornell University, May 6.
38.
StinchcombeArthur L.1959. “Bureaucratic and Craft Administration of Production.”Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 4 (September), pp. 168–87.
39.
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. 1962. Industry Wage Survey: Eating and Drinking Places, June 1961. Bulletin No. 1329. Washington, D.C.: GPO.
40.
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. 1968. Industry Wage Survey: Eating and Drinking Places, October 1966 and April 1967. Bulletin No. 1588. Washington, D.C.: GPO.
41.
U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration. 1980. Exchanging Earnings for Leisure: Findings of an Exploratory National Survey on Work Time Preferences. R&D Monograph 79. Washington, D.C.: GPO.
42.
WallihanJames. 1985. Union Government and Organization. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of National Affairs.
43.
WolmanLeo. 1926. Ebb and Flow in Trade Unionism. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
44.
YoungCindy Mahan. 1986. “Comments on Current Concerns of Waitresses by a HERE Business Representative.” Remarks presented to the Twelfth Annual Southwest Labor Studies Association Conference, March 14, San Francisco State University. Tape recording in possession of author.
45.
YoungerMaud. 1907. “The Diary of an Amateur Waitress.”McClure's Magazine, March, pp. 543–52; April, pp. 665–77.
46.
YoungerMaud. 1908. “Taking Orders: A Day as a Waitress in a San Francisco Restaurant.”Sunset Magazine, October, pp. 518–22.
