This study examines how unions affect the diffusion of manufacturing process technologies. Analyzing information from the 1983 Industry Wage Survey of the Nonelectrical Machinery Industry, which provides establishment-level data on union status and the use of seven advanced manufacturing process technologies, the author finds that unionized plants were more likely than nonunion plants to be using advanced technology. This pattern, however, apparently reflects not the effect of unionism, but of plant size and the use of shift work, both of which are related to unionism. Statistical tests reveal no direct union effect on the diffusion of the seven advanced manufacturing technologies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbowdJohn. 1987. “Collective Bargaining and the Division of the Value of the Enterprise.”Washington, D.C.: National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 2137.
2.
AddisonJohn T., and HirschBarry T.. 1989. “Union Effects on Productivity, Profits and Growth: Has the Long Run Arrived?”Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 72–105.
3.
BaldwinCarliss Y.1983. “Productivity and Labor Unions: An Application of the Theory of Self-Enforcing Contracts.”Journal of Business, Vol. 56, pp. 155–85.
4.
BarnettGeorge, 1926. Chapters on Machinery and Labor. Boston: Harvard University Press.
5.
BenvignatiAnita. 1982. “Interfirm Adoption of Capital-Goods Innovations.”Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 64, pp. 330–35.
6.
BetchermanGordon. 1987. “Technological Change and Its Impacts: Do Unions Make a Difference?” Working Paper, Economic Council of Canada.
7.
BluestoneBarry, and HarrisonBennett. 1982. The Deindustrialization of America. New York: Basic Books.
8.
BronarsStephen G., and DeereDonald R.. 1988. “Union Membership Rights, Rent-Sharing, and Firm Behavior.” Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Santa Barbara.
9.
BronarsStephen G.DeereDonald R., and TraceyJoseph. 1988. “Estimating the Influence of Unionization on Firm Behavior Using Firm-Specific Unionization Rates.” Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Santa Barbara.
10.
ClarkKim. 1984. “Unionization and Firm Performance: The Impact of Profits, Growth, and Productivity.”American Economic Review, Vol. 74, No. 5, pp. 893–919.
11.
ConnollyRobert A.HirschBarry T., and HirscheyMark. 1986. “Union Rent Seeking, Intangible Capital, and Market Value of the Firm.”Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 68, pp. 567–77.
12.
CornfieldDaniel B.1987. “Workers, Managers, and Technological Change.” In CornfieldDaniel B., ed., Workers, Managers, and Technological Change. New York: Plenum.
13.
DanielW. W.1987. Workplace Industrial Relations and Technical Change. London: Francis Pinter.
14.
DaviesStephen. 1979. The Diffusion of Process Innovations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15.
FreemanRichard. 1980. “The Exit-Voice Tradeoff in the Labor Market: Unionism, Job Tenure, Quits, and Separations.”Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 4, No. 4 (June), pp. 643–74.
16.
FreemanRichard, and MedoffJames. 1984. What Do Unions Do?New York: Basic Books.
17.
HelfgottRoy. 1988. Computerized Manufacturing and Human Resources. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.
18.
HicksDonald. 1986. Automation Technology and Industrial Renewal. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.
19.
HirschBarry. 1988. Labor Unions and the Economic Performance of U.S. Firms. Unpublished manuscript, W.E. Upjohn Institute, December.
20.
HirschBarry, and AddisonJohn. 1986. The Economic Analysis of Unions. Boston: Allen & Unwin.
21.
KatzHarryKochanThomas, and KeefeJeffrey. 1987. “Effects of Industrial Relations on Productivity.”Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 3.
22.
KeefeJeffrey. 1990. “American Unions and Technological Change.” Unpublished manuscript, Economic Policy Institute (Washington, D.C.).
23.
KelleyMaryellen R., and BrooksHarvey. 1988. The State of Computerized Automation in U.S. Manufacturing. Boston: Center for Business and Government, Harvard University.
24.
KochanThomasKatzHarry, and McKersieRobert. 1986. The Transformation of American Industrial Relations. New York: Basic Books.
25.
KochanThomasMcKersieRobert, and ChalykoffJohn. 1986. “The Effects of Corporate Strategy and Workplace Innovations on Union Representation.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 487–501.
26.
LawrenceCollin, and LawrenceRobert Z., 1985. “Manufacturing Wage Dispersion: An End Game Interpretation.”Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 1, pp. 47–106.
27.
LewisH. Gregg. 1986. Union Relative Wage Effects. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28.
MansfieldEdwin1977. The Production and Application of New Industrial Technology. New York: Norton.
29.
McLaughlinDoris. 1979. The Impact of Labor Unions on the Rate and Direction of Technological Innovation. Detroit: Wayne State University.
30.
MellowWesley, and SiderHal. 1983. “Accuracy of Response in Labor Market Surveys: Evidence and Implications.”Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 331–44.
31.
PetchinnisStephen. 1983. “The Attitude of Trade Unionists Towards Technological Change.”Relations Industrielles, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 104–19.
32.
ReesJohnBriggsRonald, and OakeyRaymond. 1984. “The Adoption of New Technology in the American Machinery Industry.”Regional Studies, Vol. 18, No. 6, pp. 489–504.
33.
SlichterSumner. 1941. Union Policies and Industrial Management. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
34.
SlichterSumnerHealyJames, and LivernashRobert. 1960. The Impact of Collective Bargaining on Management. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
35.
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. 1985. Industry Wage Survey: Machinery Manufacturing, November 1983. Bulletin 2229.
36.
WillmanPaul. 1986. Technological Change, Collective Bargaining, and Industrial Efficiency. New York: Oxford University Press.
37.
ZuboffShoshana. 1988. In the Age of the Smart Machine. New York: Basic Books.
