The authors, citing historical and statistical evidence spanning three decades, examine how the transition to flexibly specialized production organization in the motion picture industry has changed the distribution of work and wages and the definition of skills. One important result of that process has been the emergence of a new form of intra-occupational labor market segmentation, based much less on differences in hourly wage rates than on differential access to hours of work. Also, the reorganization of the production process has altered the relative bargaining power of employers and workers and of different groups within the industry work force, resulting in increased conflict among segments of the work force and a strengthening of employers' bargaining power vis-à-vis industry unions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbowdJohn A., and AshenfelterOrley. 1981. “Anticipated Unemployment, Temporary Layoffs, and Compensating Wage Differentials.” In RosenSherwin, ed., Studies in Labor Markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 141–70.
2.
BagnascoArnaldo. 1977. Tre Italie: La Problematica dello Sviluppo. Bologna: II Mulino.
3.
BeckerGary S.1964. Human Capital. New York: Columbia University Press.
4.
BernsteinHarry. 1987. “Hollywood Seeks Job-Saving Compromise.”Los Angeles Times, Feb. 4, part IV, p. 1.
5.
BernsteinIrving. 1957. “The Changing Motion Picture Industry.”Los Angeles: University of California, Institute for Industrial Relations.
6.
BlaunerRobert. 1964. Alienation and Freedom. New York: Free Press.
7.
BradsherKeith. 1987. “New Video Editing Techniques Are a Cut Above Film.”Los Angeles Times, Aug. 23, part IV, p. 1.
8.
BruscoSebastiano. 1982. “The Emilian Model: Productive Decentralization and Social Integration.”Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 6, pp. 167–84.
9.
BruscoSebastiano, and SabelCharles. 1983. “Artisanal Production and Economic Growth.” In WilkinsonF., ed., The Dynamics of Labor Market Segmentation. London: Academic Press, pp. 99–113.
10.
BurawoyMichael. 1985. The Politics of Production. London: Verso.
11.
ChristophersonSusan. 1986. “Peak Time, Slack Time: The Origins of Contingent Labor Demand.” Working paper no. 117, University of California, Los Angeles, Institute for Industrial Relations.
12.
DoeringerPeter, and PioreMichael. 1972. Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.
13.
EbelKenneth H.1985. “Social and Labor Implications of Flexible Manufacturing Systems.”International Labor Review, Vol. 124, No. 2, pp. 133–45.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. 1976. “Behind the Scenes.”Washington, D.C.: GPO.
16.
FellnerKim. 1984. “The Early Years.”Screen Actor, Fiftieth Anniversary Issue (August), pp. 30–35.
17.
HarrisonBennett, and BluestoneBarry. 1988. The Great U-Turn: Corporate Restructuring, Laissez-Faire, and the Challenge to America's High-Wage Society. New York: Basic Books.
18.
MacLeanBarbara. 1984. “The Hollywood Gold Rush: Pioneers in the Promised Land.”Screen Actor, Fiftieth Anniversary Issue (August), pp. 56–59.
19.
MichaelsonJudith. 1984. “Actors Guild Recalls Struggles, Triumphs.”Los Angeles Times, Mar. 5, 1984, part IV, p. 1.
20.
MurrayFrank. 1983. “The Decentralization of Production: The Decline of the Mass Collective Worker.”Capital and Class, Vol. 19, pp. 74–99.
21.
OstermanPaul, ed. 1986. Internal Labor Markets. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
22.
PioreMichael, and SabelCharles. 1984. The Second Industrial Divide. New York: Basic Books.
23.
RuberyJill. 1984. “The Origins of Labor Market Segmentation.”Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 8, pp. 17–36.
24.
RuberyJill, and WilkinsonFrank. 1981. “Outwork and Segmented Labor Markets.” In WilkinsonF., ed., The Dynamics of Labor Market Segmentation. London: Academic Press, pp. 115–32.
25.
ShaikenHarleyHerzenbergSteve, and KuhnSarah. 1986. “The Work Process Under More Flexible Production.”Industrial Relations, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 167–83.
26.
SolinasG.1982. “Labor Market Segmentation and Workers' Careers: The Case of Italian Knitwear.”Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 6, pp. 331–52.
27.
SpenceMichael. 1981. “Signaling, Screening, and Information.” In RosenS., ed., Studies in Labor Markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 319–57.
28.
StaigerJill. 1986. “The Labor Force, Financing and the Mode of Production.” In BardwellD.StaigerJ., and ThompsonK., The Classical Hollywood Cinema, Film Style and Mode of Production to 1960. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 26–65.
29.
StiglerGeorge J.1961. “The Economics of Information.”Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 69, pp. 213–25.
30.
StiglerGeorge J.1962. “Information in the Labor Market.”Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 70, pp. 94–105.
31.
StorperMichael, and ChristophersonSusan. 1985. The Changing Organization and Location of the U.S. Motion Picture Industry. Los Angeles: UCLA Graduate School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Research Monograph.
32.
StorperMichael, and ChristophersonSusan. 1987. “Flexible Specialization and Regional Industrial Agglomerations: The Case of the U.S. Motion Picture Industry.”Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Vol. 77, pp. 104–17.
33.
StorperMichael, and WalkerRichard A.. 1983. “The Theory of Labor and the Theory of Location.”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol 7, No. 1, pp. 1–41.
34.
United States, Department of Commerce, Bureau of Labor Statistics. 1983. Employment and Earnings. Washington, D.C.: GPO.
35.
WeinsteinHenry. 1986. “Cannon Film Group, Stage Workers Union Sign First Contract.”Los Angeles Times, Dec. 3, 1986, part I, p. 33.
