The accuracy of local unemployment rates published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics has been questioned because of their heavy reliance on secondary data sources. It has often been suggested that this criticism could be tested if the BLS's survey methodology for determining national rates were applied to local labor markets. This study employs that methodology more rigorously than previous studies to estimate unemployment in the Youngstown/Warren SMSA in June 1984. When the resulting estimates are compared with those obtained using the BLS's local survey methodology, it is found that the BLS estimates significantly understate unemployment. The author offers suggestions for improving BLS local-level statistical programs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BussTerry F., and RedburnStevens F.1983Shutdown at Youngstown: Public Policy for Mass Unemployment. Albany: State University of New York Press.
2.
CherinGabrielSternLouis H., and WillisJohn E.1975“University of Houston Area Unemployment Statistics Study.” Unpublished report.
3.
Cleveland Area Western Reserve Manpower Consortium1977Surveying Unemployment in Cleveland. Cleve land, Ohio, November.
4.
GeneralComptroller1979Reliable Local Unemployment Estimates. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
5.
Coos Curry Manpower Consortium1979Labor Force Characteristics and Occupational Employment Trends, 1979–1985. Coos Bay, Oregon.
6.
CronkhiteF. R.1985“Use of Regression Techniques for Developing State and Area Unemployment Estimates.”Wasington, D.C.:Bureau of Labor Statistics.
7.
CzajkaJohn L., and CarrTimothy J.1981The Application of Econometric and Statistical Models to the Estimation of State and Local Area Unemployment. Washington, D.C.: Mathematica.
8.
EmeryDanutaCampbellValencia, and FreedmanStanley1980“Distributing Federal Funds.”Statistical Reporter, Vol. 10, No. 2 (December), pp. 73–90.
9.
Employment and Training Division, City of Cincinnati, Ohio1978Cincinnati's Unemployment Rate. Cincinnati, Ohio, August 25.
10.
Extension Division, University of Missouri1975Measuring Unemployment in the City of St. Louis. St. Louis, Missouri, December.
11.
GoldsteinHarold1979“Improving the Measurement of City Unemployment.” In BryceHerrington J., ed., Revitalizing Cities. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.
12.
GoldsteinHarold1978State and Local Labor Force Statistics. Washington, D.C.: National Commission on Employment and Unemployment Statistics, Background Paper No. 1, May.
13.
LevitanSarMangumGarth L., and MarshallRay1981Human Resources and Labor Markets. New York: Harper & Row.
14.
LindauerJohn1966“The Accuracy of Area Unemployment Estimates Used to Identify Depressed Areas.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 19, No. 3 (April), pp. 377–89.
15.
McCarthyPhilip J.1978Some Sources of Error in Labor Force Estimates from the Current Population Survey. Washington, D.C.: National Commission on Employment and Unemployment Statistics, Background Paper No. 15, August.
16.
National Commission on Employment and Unemployment Statistics (NCEUS)1979Counting the Labor Force. Washington, D.C.
17.
PleeterSaul, and TrottaJoseph1981“An Evaluation of the Bureau of Labor Statistics Methodology for Calculating Local Unemployment Rates.”Review of Public Data Use, Vol. 9, No. 1 (March), pp. 115–22.
18.
Portland Metro Labor Consortium1981Portland Metro Labor Survey. Portland, Oregon.
19.
SudmanSeymour1976Applied Sampling. New York: Academic Press.
20.
UllmanJoseph C.1963“How Accurate Are Estimates of State and Local Government?”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 16, No. 3 (April), pp. 434–51.
21.
U.S. Bureau of the Census1978The Current Population Survey: Design and Methodology. Washington, D.C.: Department of Commerce.
22.
WetzelJames R.1974New Procedures for Estimating Unemployment in States and Local Areas: A Status Report. Paper presented to the North American Conference on Labor Statistics.
