The authors relate mothers’ children-related labor earnings losses, referred to here as child penalties, to their location in the distribution of potential hourly wages. Using French administrative data and based on an event study approach, the authors show that the magnitude of these earnings losses decreases steeply along that distribution. This heterogeneity is the result of low-wage mothers leaving the labor market and more frequently reducing their working hours. By contrast, fathers’ labor market outcomes do not vary upon the arrival of children, regardless of their location in the distribution of potential hourly wages. These marked differences suggest that the pervasive part of life-cycle gender inequality associated with parenthood is related to both financial incentives and gender norms.
AddaJérômeDustmannChristianStevensKatrien. 2017. The career costs of children. Journal of Political Economy125(2):293–337.
2.
AkerlofGeorge A.KrantonRachel E.2000. Economics and identity. Quarterly Journal of Economics115(3):715–53.
3.
AlbrechtJamesBjörklundA.VromanSusan. 2003. Is there a glass ceiling in Sweden?Journal of Labor Economics41:89–114.
4.
AlbrechtJamesThoursiePeter SkogmanVromanSusan. 2015. Parental leave and the glass ceiling in Sweden. In TatsiramosKonstantinosPolachekSolomon W.ZimmermannKlaus (Eds.), Gender Convergence in the Labor Market., Vol. 41, pp. 89–114. Leeds, England, UK: Emerald Publishing Ltd.
5.
AndersonDeborah J.BinderMelissaKrauseKate. 2003. The motherhood wage penalty revisited: Experience, heterogeneity, work effort, and work-schedule flexibility. Industrial and Labor Relations Review56(2):273–94.
6.
AndresenMartin EckhoffNixEmily. 2021. What causes the child penalty? Evidence from adopting and same-sex couples. Journal of Labor Economics40(4):971–1004
7.
AndrewAlisonBandieraOrianaCosta-DiasMonicaLandais.Camille2021. Women and men at work. IFS Deaton Review of Inequalities. Institute for Fiscal Studies.
8.
AngelovNikolayJohanssonPerLindahlErica. 2016. Parenthood and the gender gap in pay. Journal of Labor Economics34(3):545–79.
9.
ArulampalamWijiBoothAlison L.BryanMark L.2007. Is there a glass ceiling over Europe? Exploring the gender pay gap across the wage distribution. Industrial and Labor Relations Review60(2):163–86.
10.
BazenStephenJoutardXavierPérivierHélène. 2025. Measuring the child penalty early in a career: OFCE Working Paper No. 2. Paris: Observatory French des Conjonctures Économiques.
11.
BeckerGary S.1981. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
BeckerGary S.1985. Human capital, effort, and the sexual division of labor. Journal of Labor Economics3:33–58.
13.
BertrandMarianneDufloEstherMullainathanSendhil. 2004. How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates?Quarterly Journal of Economics119(1):249–75.
14.
BertrandMarianneGoldinClaudiaKatzLawrence F.2010. Dynamics of the gender gap for young professionals in the financial and corporate sectors. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics2(3):228–55.
15.
BudigMichelle J.HodgesMelissa J.2010. Differences in disadvantage: Variation in the motherhood penalty across white women’s earnings distribution. American Sociological Review75(5):705–28.
16.
BudigMichelle J.HodgesMelissa J.2014. Statistical models and empirical evidence for differences in the motherhood penalty across the earnings distribution. American Sociological Review79(2):358–64.
17.
BütikoferAlineJensenSisselSalvanesKjell G.2018. The role of parenthood on the gender gap among top earners. European Economic Review109(C):103–23.
18.
ChampagneClaraPailhéArianeSolazAnne. 2015. Le temps domestique et parental des hommes et des femmes: quels facteurs d’évolutions en 25 ans?Économie et Statistique478:209–42.
19.
CharnozPaulineCoudinEliseGainiMathilde. 2011. Wage inequalities in France 1976–2004: A quantile regression analysis. Working Paper No. g2011/106. INSEE. Statistiques et études. https://www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/1380963
20.
ChonéPhilippele BlancDavidRobert-BobéeIsabelle. 2004. Offre de travail féminine et garde des jeunes enfants. Économie et Prévision162(1):23–50.
21.
CoudinEliseMaillardSophieTôMaxime. 2018. Family, firms and the gender wage gap in France. IFS Working Paper No. W18/01. London: Institute for Fiscal Studies.
22.
CraigLynMullanKillian. 2011. How mothers and fathers share childcare: A cross-national time-use comparison. American Sociological Review76(6):834–61.
23.
Datta GuptaNabanitaSmithNinaVernerMette. 2008. The impact of Nordic countries’ family friendly policies on employment, wages, and children. Review of Economics of the Household6(1):65–89.
24.
de ChaisemartinClémentD’HaultfœuilleXavier. 2022. Two-way fixed effects and differences-in-differences with heterogeneous treatment effects: A survey. Econometrics Journal26(3):C1–C30.
25.
de QuintoAliciaHospidoLauraSanzCarlos. 2021. The child penalty: Evidence from Spain. SERIEs12:585–606.
26.
EjrnæsMetteKunzeAstrid. 2013. Work and wage dynamics around childbirth. Scandinavian Journal of Economics115(3):856–77.
27.
EnglandPaulaBearakJonathanBudigMichelle J.HodgesMelissa J.2016. Do highly paid, highly skilled women experience the largest motherhood penalty?American Sociological Review81(6):1161–189.
28.
FortinNicole M.BellBrianBöhmMichael. 2017. Top earnings inequality and the gender pay gap: Canada, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. Labour Economics47(C):107–23.
29.
GivordPaulineMarbotClaire. 2015. Does the cost of child care affect female labor market participation? An evaluation of a French reform of childcare subsidies. Labour Economics36(C):99–111.
30.
GobillonLaurentMeursDominiqueRouxSébastien. 2015. Estimating gender differences in access to jobs. Journal of Labor Economics33(2):317–63.
31.
GoldinClaudia. 2014. A grand gender convergence: Its last chapter. American Economic Review104(4):1091–119.
32.
GuvenenFatihKarahanFatihOzkanSerdarSongJae. 2021. What do data on millions of U.S. workers reveal about lifecycle earnings dynamics?Econometrica89(5):2303–339.
33.
HerschJoniStrattonLeslie S.1997. Housework, fixed effects, and wages of married workers. Journal of Human Resources32(2):285–307.
34.
HussMarie-Monique. 1990. Pronatalism in the inter-war period in France. Journal of Contemporary History25(1):39–68.
35.
JosephOlivierPailhéArianeRecotilletIsabelleSolazAnne. 2013. The economic impact of taking short parental leave: Evaluation of a French reform. Labour Economics25(C):63–75.
36.
JuhnChinhuiMcCueKristin. 2017. Specialization then and now: Marriage, children, and the gender earnings gap across cohorts. Journal of Economic Perspectives31(1):183–204.
37.
KillewaldAlexandraBearakJonathan. 2014. Is the motherhood penalty larger for low-wage women? A comment on quantile regression. American Sociological Review79(2):350–57.
38.
KlevenHenrikLandaisCamilleLeite-MarianteGabriel. Forthcoming. The child penalty atlas. Review of Economic Studies.
39.
KlevenHenrikLandaisCamillePoschJohannaSteinhauerAndreasZweimüllerJosef. 2019. Child penalties across countries: Evidence and explanations. AEA Papers and Proceedings109(May):122–26.
40.
KlevenHenrikLandaisCamillePoschJohannaSteinhauerAndreasZweimüllerJosef. 2024. Do family policies reduce gender inequality? Evidence from 60 years of policy experimentation. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy16(2):110–49.
41.
KlevenHenrikLandaisCamilleSøgaardJakob Egholt. 2019. Children and gender inequality: Evidence from Denmark. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics11(4):181–209.
42.
KlevenHenrikLandaisCamilleSøgaardJakob Egholt. 2021. Does biology drive child penalties? Evidence from biological and adoptive families. American Economic Review: Insights3(2):183–98.
43.
LachowskaMartaMasAlexandreWoodburyStephen A.2020. Sources of displaced workers’ long-term earnings losses. American Economic Review110(10):3231–66.
44.
LequienLaurent. 2012. The impact of parental leave duration on later wages. Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES 107-108:267–85.
45.
LundbergShellyRoseElaina. 2000. Parenthood and the earnings of married men and women. Labour Economics7(6):689–710.
46.
MeursDominiquePailhéArianePonthieuxSophie. 2010. Child-related career interruptions and the gender wage gap in France. Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, 99-100:15–46.
47.
MeursDominiquePoraPierre. 2019. Égalité professionnelle entre les femmes et les hommes en France: une lente convergence freinée par les maternités. Economie et Statistique/Economics and Statistics510:109–30.
48.
MillerAmalia R.2011. The effects of motherhood timing on career path. Journal of Population Economics24:1071–1100.
49.
PérivierHélèneVerdugoGregory. 2024. Where are the fathers? Effects of earmarking parental leave for fathers in France. ILR Review77(1):88–118.
50.
PikettyThomas. 2005. L’impact de l’allocation parentale d’éducation sur l’activité féminine et la fécondité en France, 1982–2002. Les Cahiers de l’INED, pp. 79–109.
51.
RabostoMartina QuerejetaBucheliMarisa. 2023. The effect of childbirth on women’s formal labour market trajectories: Evidence from Uruguayan administrative data. Journal of Development Studies59(2):209–23.
52.
RaleySaraBianchiSuzanne M.WangWendy. 2012. When do fathers care? Mothers’ economic contribution and fathers’ involvement in child care. American Journal of Sociology117(5):1422–59.
53.
RosentalPaul-André. 2010. Politique familiale et natalité en France: un siècle de mutations d’une question sociétale. Santé, Société et SolidaritéNo. 2:17–25.
54.
SteinhauerAndreas. 2018. Working moms, childlessness, and female identity. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 12929. Paris: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
55.
WaldfogelJane. 1995. The price of motherhood: Family status and women’s pay in a young British cohort. Oxford Economic Papers47(4):584–610.
56.
WaldfogelJane. 1997. The effect of children on women’s wages. American Sociological Review62(2):209–17.
57.
WaldfogelJane. 1998. Understanding the “Family Gap” in pay for women with children. Journal of Economic Perspectives12(1):137–56.
58.
WilnerLionel. 2016. Worker-firm matching and the parenthood pay gap: Evidence from linked employer-employee data. Journal of Population Economics29(4):991–1023.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
