The authors examine the implications of robotics for warehouse worker safety. While warehouse automation has the potential to reduce injuries by eliminating high-risk tasks, it may also increase injuries among remaining non-automated tasks because of reduced task variety and an accelerated pace of work. Findings provide evidence of both effects: Warehouse robotics are associated with a 40% decrease in severe injuries but a 77% increase in non-severe injuries. The authors provide subsequent evidence that the rise in non-severe injuries is at least partially attributable to the increased pace of work at robotics facilities. The implications of the findings for regulators, policymakers, workers, and firms are discussed.
AcemogluDaronRestrepoPascual. 2020. Robots and jobs: Evidence from US labor markets. Journal of Political Economy128(6):2188–244.
2.
AgrawalAjay K.GansJoshua S.GoldfarbAvi. 2021. AI adoption and system-wide change. NBER Working Paper No. 28811. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
AntónJosé-IgnacioFernández-MacíasEnriqueWinter-EbmerRudolf. 2023. Does robotization affect job quality? Evidence from European regional labor markets. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society62(3):233–56.
6.
AutorDavid H.2015. Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives29(3):3–30.
BeaneMatthew. 2019. Shadow learning: Building robotic surgical skill when approved means fail. Administrative Science Quarterly64(1):87–123.
9.
BekhtiarKarimBittschiBenjaminSellnerRichard. 2021. Robots at work? Pitfalls of industry level data. WIFO Working Papers 639. December. Vienna, Austria: Austrian Institute of Economic Research.
10.
BergJanineGreenFrancisNurskiLauraSpencerDavid A.2023. Risks to job quality from digital technologies: Are industrial relations in Europe ready for the challenge?European Journal of Industrial Relations29(4):347–65.
11.
BessenJames. 2015. Toil and technology: Innovative technology is displacing workers to new jobs rather than replacing them entirely. International Monetary Fund, Finance & Development52(1):16.
12.
BessenJames E.2016. How computer automation affects occupations: Technology, jobs, and skills. Boston University School of Law, Law and Economics Research Paper No. 15-49. https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship/813
[BLS] Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2023a. Employer-reported workplace injuries and illnesses, 2021–2022. BLS News Release USDL-24-2268. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/osh.pdf
15.
[BLS] Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2023b. Warehousing and storage: NAICS 493. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Data Tools, Industries at a Glance. https://www.bls.gov/iag/tgs/iag493.htm
16.
BorensteinJason. 2010. Work life in the robotic age. Communications of the ACM53(7):30–31.
17.
BresnahanTimothy. 2019. Artificial intelligence technologies and aggregate growth prospects. In DiamondJohn W.ZodrowGeorge R. (Eds.), Prospects for Economic Growth in the United States, pp. 132–70. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
BrosqueCynthiaFischerMartin. 2022. Safety, quality, schedule, and cost impacts of ten construction robots. Construction Robotics6(2):163–86.
19.
BurtchGordonYooYoungjinWeissAaron. 2010. Digital innovation and craftsmanship: The case of C.F. Martin & Company. ICIS 2010 Proceedings, Conference Paper No. 152. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). St Louis, MO.
20.
CohenJacob. 2013. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
Di GiacomoGiuseppeLerchBenjamin. 2020. Robots and non-participation in the US: Where have all the workers gone? Available at SSRN 4874380.
23.
DixonJayHongBryanWuLynn. 2021. The robot revolution: Managerial and employment consequences for firms. Management Science67(9):5586–605.
24.
FrankMorgan R.AutorDavidBessenJames E.BrynjolfssonErikCebrianManuelDemingDavid J.FeldmanMaryannGrohMatthewLoboJoséMoroEsteban, et al. 2019. Toward understanding the impact of artificial intelligence on labor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences116(14):6531–39.
GardnerJohn. 2022. Two-stage differences in differences. Econometrics. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2207.05943.
27.
GihlebRaniaGiuntellaOseaStellaLucaWangTianyi. 2022. Industrial robots, workers’ safety, and health. Labour Economics78:102205.
28.
GörlichDennis. 2010. Complementary tasks and the limits to the division of labour. Kiel Working Papers 1670. Kiel, Germany: Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
29.
GraetzGeorgMichaelsGuy. 2018. Robots at work. Review of Economics and Statistics100(5):753–68.
GualtieriLucaRauchErwinVidoniRenato. 2021. Emerging research fields in safety and ergonomics in industrial collaborative robotics: A systematic literature review. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing67:101998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2020.101998
32.
GuteliusBethTheodoreNik. 2019. The future of warehouse work: Technological change in the U.S. logistics industry. A Joint Report with Working Partnerships USA, October22. UC Berkeley Center for Labor Research.
33.
HeoYoung-JinKimDayeonLeeWoongyongKimHyoungkyunParkJonghoonChungWan Kyun. 2019. Collision detection for industrial collaborative robots: A deep learning approach. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters4(2):740–46.
34.
HunterLarry W.BernhardtAnnetteHughesKatherine L.SkuratowiczEva. 2001. It's not just the ATMs: Technology, firm strategies, jobs, and earnings in retail banking. Industrial and Labor Relations Review54(2A):402–24.
35.
ImaiKosukeRatkovicMarc. 2014. Covariate balancing propensity score. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology76(1):243–63.
36.
KarwowskiWaldemarRahimiMansourMihalyTina. 1988. Effects of computerized automation and robotics on safety performance of a manufacturing plant. Journal of Occupational Accidents10(3):217–33.
37.
MacKinnonJames G.WebbMatthew D.2018. The wild bootstrap for few (treated) clusters. Econometrics Journal21(2):114–35.
38.
MurashovVladimirHearlFrankHowardJohn. 2016. Working safely with robot workers: Recommendations for the new workplace. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene13(3):D61–D71.
ParkerSharon K.GroteGudela. 2022. Automation, algorithms, and beyond: Why work design matters more than ever in a digital world. Applied Psychology71(4):1171–204.
41.
PathaniaVikramNetessineSerguei. 2022. The impact of Amazon facilities on local economies. October26. Available at SSRN 4116645. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4116645 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4116645
42.
PeshkinMichaelColgateJ. Edward. 1999. Cobots. Industrial Robot: An International Journal26(5):335–41.
43.
PillaiRajasshrieSivathanuBrijeshMarianiMarcelloRana.Nripendra P.YangBaiDwivediYogesh Kumar. 2022. Adoption of AI-empowered industrial robots in auto component manufacturing companies. Production Planning & Control33(16):1517–33.
RothJonathanSant’AnnaPedro H. C.BilinskiAlyssaPoeJohn. 2023. What’s trending in difference-in-differences? A synthesis of the recent econometrics literature. Journal of Econometrics235(2):2218–44.
46.
RudolphKara E.WilliamsNicholas T.MilazzoFlorianaVenkataramaniAtheendarO’BrienRourke. 2023. Has the opening of Amazon fulfillment centers affected demand for disability insurance?Plos One18(11):e0294453.
47.
VasicMilosBillardAude. 2013. Safety issues in human-robot interactions. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Karlsruhe, Germany, pp. 197–204. doi: 10.1109/lCRA.2013.6630576
48.
VautrinJean PaulDei SvaldiDavid. 1986. Manipulating industrial robots in France—Effects on health, safety and working conditions: Results of the INRS–CRAM survey. Journal of Occupational Accidents8(1–2):1–12.
49.
WelfareKatherine S.HallowellMatthew R.ShahJulie A.RiekLaurel D.2019. Consider the human work experience when integrating robotics in the workplace. 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction (HRI). Daegu, Korea (South), pp. 75–84. doi: 10.1109/HRI.2019.8673139
50.
XuXinlingHardinJames W.2016. Regression models for bivariate count outcomes. Stata Journal16(2):301–15.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
