This article explores why many public school teachers work substantially more hours than required by contract, given that the elasticity of their earnings with respect to their hours is close to zero. The author introduces a theoretical framework for public-sector employees in which high levels of effort can indicate either altruism (for intrinsically motivated employees) or low productivity (for low-ability employees). Because intrinsically motivated employees derive higher utility from working in the public sector, they are less likely to exit it. Over time, selection makes high levels of effort more strongly predictive of altruism than of low ability. Findings show that teachers with very low levels of experience exhibit little or no relationship between weekly hours and the probability of remaining in teaching. This correlation becomes more positive as teaching experience increases. Similarly, the level of work hours is positively related to self-reported burnout at low levels of experience, but the relationship is reversed for teachers who have been in the profession longer.
AndreoniJames. 1989. Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. Journal of Political Economy97(6): 1447–58.
2.
ArensA. KatrinMorinAlexandre J. S.2016. Relations between teachers’ emotional exhaustion and students’ educational outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology108(6): 800–813.
3.
AtkinsonAdeleBurgessSimonCroxsonBronwynGreggPaulPropperCarolSlaterHelenWilsonDeborah. 2009. Evaluating the impact of performance-related pay for teachers in England. Labour Economics16(3): 251–61.
4.
BesleyTimothyGhatakMaitreesh. 2005. Competition and incentives with motivated agents. American Economic Review95(3): 616–36.
5.
BesleyTimothyGhatakMaitreesh. 2006. Sorting with motivated agents: Implications for school competition and teacher incentives. Journal of the European Economic Association4(2-3): 404–14.
6.
BrekkeKjell ArneNyborgKarine. 2010. Selfish bakers, caring nurses? A model of work motivation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization75(3): 377–94.
7.
CortésPatriciaPanJessica. 2019. When time binds: Substitutes for household production, returns to working long hours, and the skilled gender wage gap. Journal of Labor Economics37(2): 351–98.
8.
DelfgaauwJosseDurRobert. 2008. Incentives and workers’ motivation in the public sector. Economic Journal118(525): 171–91.
9.
DoltonPetervan der KlaauwWilbert. 1995. Leaving teaching in the UK: A duration analysis. Economic Journal105(429): 431–44.
10.
DoltonPetervan der KlaauwWilbert. 1999. The turnover of teachers: A competing risks explanation. Review of Economics and Statistics81(3): 543–50.
11.
DragoRobertCaplanRobertCostanzaDavidBrubakerTanyaCloudDarnellHarrisNaomiKashlanRussellRiggsT. Lynn. 1999. New estimates of working time for elementary school teachers. Monthly Labor Review122(4): 31–40.
12.
FrancoisPatrickVlassopoulosMichael. 2008. Pro-social motivation and the delivery of social services. CESifo Economic Studies54(1): 22–54.
13.
GaynorMartinRebitzerJames B.TaylorLowell J.2004. Physician incentives in health maintenance organizations. Journal of Political Economy112(4): 915–31.
14.
GershensonSeth. 2016. Performance standards and employee effort: Evidence from teacher absences. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management35(3): 615–38.
15.
GichevaDora. 2013. Working long hours and early career outcomes in the high-end labor market. Journal of Labor Economics31(4): 785–824.
16.
GichevaDora. 2020a. Altruism and burnout: Long hours in the teaching profession. UNCG Economics Working Paper No. 20-07. University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Department of Economics.
17.
GichevaDora. 2020b. Occupational social value and returns to long hours. Economica87(374): 682–712.
18.
GoldinClaudia. 2014. A grand gender convergence: Its last chapter. American Economic Review104(4): 1091–119.
19.
GoodmanSarena F.TurnerLesley J.2013. The design of teacher incentive pay and educational outcomes: Evidence from the New York City bonus program. Journal of Labor Economics31(2): 409–20.
20.
GreenbergMarkBrownJoshua L.AbenavoliRachel. 2016. Teacher stress and health effects on teachers, students, and schools. Edna Bennett Pierce Prevention Research Center, Pennsylvania State University.
21.
GreggPaulGroutPaul A.RatcliffeAnitaSmithSarahWindmeijerFrank. 2011. How important is pro-social behaviour in the delivery of public services?Journal of Public Economics95(7): 758–66.
22.
HanushekEric A.KainJohn F.RivkinSteven G.2004. Why public schools lose teachers. Journal of Human Resources39(2): 326–54.
23.
HanushekEric A.RivkinSteven G.2006. Teacher quality. In HanushekEric A.WelchFinis (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Education, Vol. 2, pp. 1051–78. Amsterdam: North-Holland/Elsevier.
24.
HeyesAnthony. 2005. The economics of vocation or “Why is a badly paid nurse a good nurse?”Journal of Health Economics24(3): 561–69.
25.
HoxbyCaroline M.2002. Would school choice change the teaching profession?Journal of Human Resources37(4): 846–91.
26.
IngersollRichard M.2001. Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal38(3): 499–534.
27.
Krantz-KentRachel. 2008. Teachers’ work patterns: When, where, and how much do US teachers work. Monthly Labor Review131: 52–59.
28.
LavyVictor. 2009. Performance pay and teachers’ effort, productivity, and grading ethics. American Economic Review99(5): 1979–2021.
29.
MacartneyHughMcMillanRobertPetronijevicUros. 2018. Teacher performance and accountability incentives. NBER Working Paper No. 24747. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
30.
MurnaneRichard J.OlsenRandall J.1989. The effect of salaries and opportunity costs on duration in teaching: Evidence from Michigan. Review of Economics and Statistics71(2): 347–52.
31.
MurnaneRichard J.OlsenRandall J.1990. The effects of salaries and opportunity costs on length of stay in teaching: Evidence from North Carolina. Journal of Human Resources25(1): 106–24.
32.
PodgurskyMichael. 2011. Teacher compensation and collective bargaining. In HanushekEric A.MachinStephenWoessmannLudger (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Education, Vol. 3, pp. 279–313. Amsterdam: North-Holland/Elsevier.
33.
PodgurskyMichaelMonroeRyanWatsonDonald. 2004. The academic quality of public school teachers: An analysis of entry and exit behavior. Economics of Education Review23(5): 507–18.
34.
PodgurskyMichael J.SpringerMatthew G.2007a. Credentials versus performance: Review of the teacher performance pay research. Peabody Journal of Education82(4): 551–73.
35.
PodgurskyMichael J.SpringerMatthew G.2007b. Teacher performance pay: A review. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management26(4): 909–49.
36.
PrendergastCanice. 2007. The motivation and bias of bureaucrats. American Economic Review97(1): 180–96.
37.
RebitzerJames B.TaylorLowell J.2011. Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motives: Standard and behavioral approaches to agency and labor markets. In AshenfelterOrleyCardDavid (Eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 4A, pp. 701–72. Amsterdam: North-Holland/Elsevier.
38.
RugglesStevenFloodSarahGoekenRonaldGroverJosiahMeyerErinPacasJoseSobekMatthew. 2018. IPUMS USA: Version 8.0 [dataset]. Minneapolis, MN: IPUMS. Accessed at https://doi.org/10.18128/D010.V8.0.
39.
ScafidiBenjaminSjoquistDavid L.StinebricknerTodd R.2006. Do teachers really leave for higher paying jobs in alternative occupations?B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy6(1): 1–44.
40.
SmithTom W.2007. Job satisfaction in the United States. Technical Report. NORC at the University of Chicago.
41.
StinebricknerTodd R.2002. An analysis of occupational change and departure from the labor force: Evidence of the reasons that teachers leave. Journal of Human Resources37(1): 192–216.
42.
StoddardChristianaKuhnPeter. 2008. Incentives and effort in the public sector: Have US education reforms increased teachers’ work hours?Economics of Education Review27(1): 1–13.
43.
WiswallMatthew.2007. Licensing and occupational sorting in the market for teachers. New York University, Department of Economics.
44.
WiswallMatthew.2013. The dynamics of teacher quality. Journal of Public Economics100: 61–78.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
