Recent evidence documents an increased interest among American workers in joining a union. At the same time, there is revived debate among labor scholars, union leaders, politicians, and activists over what forms of labor representation are best suited to meet the needs of the contemporary workforce. Yet little is known about what contemporary workers have to say about these debates. This article draws on a conjoint survey experiment fielded on a nationally representative sample of more than 4,000 employees to explore the forms of representation workers want and are willing to support by paying dues. The authors compare interest in the forms of labor representation that are currently being debated. Results show that while workers value traditional collective bargaining, they would be even more willing to join and financially support organizations currently unavailable under US law and practice. The authors use these results to draw implications for the labor movement, worker advocacy groups, and the future of labor law.
BansakKirkHainmuellerJensHopkinsDaniel JYamamotoTeppei. 2017. Beyond the breaking point? Survey satisficing in conjoint experiments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Political Science Department Research Paper No. 2017-16. Accessed at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.title>cfm?abstract_id=2959146 (June2018).
9.
BarenbergMark. 2015. Widening the scope of worker organizing: Legal reforms to facilitate multi-employer organizing, bargaining, and striking. New York: The Roosevelt Institute.
10.
BarlingJulian, E.KellowayKevinBremermannEric H.1991. Preemployment predictors of union attitudes: The role of family socialization and work beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology76(5): 725–31.
11.
BlockSharonSachsBenjamin I.2020. Clean slate for worker power: Building a just economy and society. Report. Labor and Worklife Program, Harvard Law School.
12.
BroockmanDavidKallaJoshua. 2016. Durably reducing transphobia: A field experiment on door-to-door canvassing. Science352(6282): 220–24.
13.
BurnsJoe. 2011. Reviving the Strike: How Working People Can Regain Power and Transform America. New York: Ig Publishing.
14.
CarnesNicholasLupuNoam. 2016. Do voters dislike working-class candidates? Voter biases and the descriptive underrepresentation of the working class. American Political Science Review110(4): 832–44.
15.
ClarkPeter B.WilsonJames Q.1961. Incentive systems: A theory of organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly6: 129–66.
16.
DimickMatthew. 2012. Labor law, new governance, and the Ghent system. North Carolina Law Review90: 320–78.
17.
EidlinBarry. 2018. Labor and the Class Idea in the United States and Canada. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
FantasiaRick. 1988. Cultures of Solidarity: Consciousness, Action, and Contemporary American Workers. Berkeley: University of California Press.
19.
FarberHenry. 1983. The determination of the union status of workers. Econometrica51(5): 1417–37.
20.
FarberHenrySaksDaniel H.1980. Why workers want unions: The role of relative wages and job characteristics. Journal of Political Economy88(2): 349–69.
21.
FergusonJohn-Paul. 2008. The eyes of the needles: A sequential model of union organizing drives, 1999–2004. Industrial and Labor Relations Review62(1): 3–21.
22.
FineJanice. 2005. Worker centers: Organizing communities at the edge of the dream. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
23.
FinkinMatthew W.2011. The death and transfiguration of labor law. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal33(1): 171–86.
24.
FreemanRichard B.RogersJoel. [1999] 2006. What Workers Want. Updated edition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
25.
GomezRafaelGundersonMorley. 2004. The experience good model of trade union membership. In WunnavaPhanindra V. (Ed.), The Changing Role of Unions: New Forms of Representation, pp. 92–112. New York: M.E. Sharpe.
26.
GourevitchAlex. 2018. The right to strike: A radical view. American Political Science Review112(4): 905–17.
27.
GreenstoneJ. David. 1969. Labor in American Politics. New York: Knopf.
28.
HainmuellerJensHopkinsDaniel J.TamamotoTeppei. 2014. Causal inference in conjoint analysis: Understanding multidimensional choices via stated preference experiments. Political Analysis22(1): 1–30.
29.
Hertel-FernandezAlexander. 2019. State Capture: How Conservative Activists, Big Businesses, and Wealthy Donors Reshaped the American States—and the Nation. New York: Oxford University Press.
30.
Hertel-FernandezAlexanderNaiduSureshReichAdam. 2019. Do teacher strikes make parents pro- or anti-labor? The effects of labor unrest on mass attitudes. Washington, DC: Washington Center for Equitable Growth Working Paper Series.
31.
Hertel-FernandezAlexanderNaiduSureshReichAdam. 2020. Facing COVID-19, low-wage service workers are striking across the country. Here’s why—and why it matters. Washington Post, April6.
32.
KallebergArne. 2013. Good Jobs, Bad Jobs: The Rise of Polarized and Precarious Employment Systems in the United States, 1970s to 2000s. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
33.
KittnerDorothy R.1964. Supplemental unemployment benefit plans in major agreements. Monthly Labor Review88(1): 19–26.
34.
KochanThomas A.1979. How American workers view labor unions. Monthly Labor Review102: 23–31.
35.
KochanThomas A.2005. Restoring the American Dream. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36.
KochanThomas A.2011. Rethinking and reframing U.S. policy on worker voice and representation. ABA Journal of Labor & Employment Law26(2): 231–48.
37.
KochanThomas A.2020. Workers left out of government and business response to the coronavirus. The Conversation, March20.
38.
KochanThomas A.KatzHarry C.McKersieRobert B.1986. The Transformation of American Industrial Relations. New York: Basic Books.
39.
KochanThomas A.YangDuanyiKimballWilliam T.KellyErin L.2019. Worker voice in America: Is there a gap between what workers expect and what they experience?ILR Review72(1): 3–38.
LenzGabriel S.2012. Follow the Leader? How Voters Respond to Politicians’ Policies and Performance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42.
LeviMargaretOlsonDavidAgnoneJonKellyDevin. 2009. Union democracy reexamined. Politics and Society37(2): 203–28.
43.
LichtensteinNelson. 2002. State of the Union: A Century of American Labor. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
44.
LipsetSeymour MartinTrowMartinColemanJames. 1956. Union Democracy. Garden City, NJ: Anchor Books.
45.
MadlandDavid. 2016. The future of worker voice and power. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
46.
MadlandDavid. 2019. How to promote sectoral bargaining in the United States. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
47.
MarantoCheryl L.FioritoJack. 1987. The effect of union characteristics on the outcome of NLRB certification elections. Industrial and Labor Relations Review40(2): 225–40.
48.
MartinCathie JoSwankDuane. 2012. The Political Construction of Business Interests: Coordination, Growth, and Equality. New York: Cambridge University Press.
49.
McAleveyJane F.2016. No Shortcuts: Organizing for Power in the New Gilded Age. New York: Oxford University Press.
50.
McCartyNolanPooleKeith T.RosenthalHoward. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
51.
MoeTerry M.1988. The Organization of Interests: Incentives and the Internal Dynamics of Political Interest Groups. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
52.
OlsonMancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53.
PencavelJohn H.1971. The demand for union services: An exercise. Industrial and Labor Relations Review24(2): 180–90.
54.
PopeJames Gray. 2008. Class conflicts of Law I: Unilateral worker lawmaking versus unilateral employer lawmaking in the U.S. workplace. Buffalo Law Review56(4): 1095–127.
55.
RobinsonIan. 1993. Economistic unionism in crisis: The origins, consequences, and prospects of Canada-US labour movement character divergence. In JensonJaneMahonRianne (Eds.), The Challenge of Restructuring: North American Labor Movements Respond, pp. 19–47. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
56.
RolfDavid. 2018. A roadmap to rebuilding worker power. Washington, DC: The Century Foundation.
57.
RosenfeldJake. 2006. Desperate measures: Strikes and wages in post-Accord America. Social Forces85(1): 235–65.
58.
SachsBenjamin I.2010. Enabling employee choice: A structural approach to the rules of union organizing. Harvard Law Review123: 655–728.
59.
SachsBenjamin I.2013. The unbundled union: Politics without collective bargaining. Yale Law Journal123(1): 1–265.
60.
SchlozmanDaniel. 2015. When Movements Anchor Parties. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
61.
Stepan-NorrisJudithZeitlinMaurice. 2002. Left Out: Reds and America’s Industrial Unions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
62.
SummersClyde. 1966. American and European labor law: The use and usefulness of foreign experience. Buffalo Law Review16: 210–28.
63.
TeeleDawn LanganKallaJoshuaRosenbluthFrances. 2018. The ties that double bind: Social roles and women’s underrepresentation in politics. American Political Science Review112(3): 525–41.
64.
VossKimShermanRachel. 2000. Breaking the iron law of oligarchy: Union revitalization in the American labor movement. American Sociological Review106(2): 303–49.
65.
WesternBruce. 1997. Between Class and Market: Postwar Unionization in the Capitalist Democracies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
66.
WestneyD. Eleanor. 1989. The international transfer of organizational technologies. International Trade Journal4(1): 69–90.
67.
YglesiasMatthew. 2018. Elizabeth Warren has a plan to save capitalism. Vox, August15.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
