The authors analyze the effect of technological innovation on employment and job quality using a difference-in-differences matching model and a unique matched data set of French firms (the Community Innovation Survey with administrative and fiscal data). Overall, they find evidence that product innovation increases employment and certain dimensions of job quality, such as the number of permanent contracts and working hours. The authors consider this virtuous circle between innovation, employment, and job quality to be nuanced, however, for two reasons. First, not all social groups benefit from firm innovation, as lower-skilled workers are less positively affected in terms of employment and are sometimes negatively affected in terms of wages. Second, the positive effects of innovation appear mainly in manufacturing and not in services. Public policy should pay attention, then, to the consequences of innovation across individuals and sectors to ensure that innovation is beneficial to all.
AntonucciTommasoPiantaMario. 2002. Employment effects of product and process innovation in Europe. International Review of Applied Economics16(3): 295–307.
3.
AutorDavid H.2015. Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives29(3): 3–30.
4.
AutorDavid H.KatzLawrence F.KruegerAlan B. 1998. Computing inequality: Have computers changed the labor market?Quarterly Journal of Economics113(4): 1169–214.
5.
AutorDavidLevyFrankMurnaneRichard. 2003. The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration. Quarterly Journal of Economics118: 1279–333.
6.
CaliendoMarcoKopeinigSabine. 2005. Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. IZA Discussion Paper No. 1588. Bonn, Germany: Institute of Labor Economics.
7.
CalvinoFlavioVirgillitoMaria Enrica. 2018. The innovation-employment nexus: A critical survey of theory and empirics. Journal of Economic Surveys32(1): 83–117.
8.
ClarkAndrew. 2005. Your money or your life: Changing job quality in OECD countries. British Journal of Industrial Relations43(3): 377–400.
9.
CoombsRodMilesIan. 2000. Innovation, measurement and services. In MetcalfeJ. StanleyMilesIan (Eds.), Innovation Systems in the Service Economy: Measurement and Case Study Analysis, pp. 85–103. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
DavoineLucieErhelChristineGuergoat-LarivièreMathilde. 2008. Monitoring employment quality in work: European employment strategy indicators and beyond. International Labour Review147(2-3): 163–98.
12.
DomsMarkDunneTimothyTroskeKenneth. 1997. Workers, wages, and technology. Quarterly Journal of Economics112(1): 253–89.
13.
Eurofound. 2015. Upgrading or polarization? Long-term and global shifts in the employment structure: European Jobs Monitor 2015. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
14.
Eurofound and the International Labour Organization (ILO). 2017. Working Anytime, Anywhere: The Effects on the World of Work. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; Geneva: International Labor Office.
15.
EvangelistaRinaldoSavonaMaria. 2002. The impact of innovation on employment in services: Evidence from Italy. International Review of Applied Economics16(3): 309–18.
16.
FranceschiFrancescoMarianiVincenzo. 2016. Flexible labor and innovation in the Italian industrial sector. Industrial and Corporate Change25(4): 633–48.
17.
GallieDuncan (Ed.). 2007. Employment Regimes and the Quality of Work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
GalloujFaïzSavonaMaria. 2010. Towards a theory of innovation in services. In GalloujFaïzDjellalFaridah (Eds.), The Handbook of Innovation and Services: A Multi-disciplinary Perspective, pp. 27–48. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
19.
GiuliodoriDavidStucchiRodolfo. 2012. Innovation and job creation in a dual labor market: Evidence from Spain. Economics of Innovation and New Technology21(8): 801–13.
20.
GoosMaartenManningAlanSalomonsAnna. 2014. Explaining job polarization: Routine-biased technological change and offshoring. American Economic Review104(8): 2509–26.
21.
GreenFrancisMostafaTarekParent-ThirionAgnèsVermeylenGreetHoutenGijs vanBilettaIsabellaLyly-YrjanainenMaija. 2013. Is job quality becoming more unequal?ILR Review66(4): 753–84.
22.
KleinknechtAlfredMontfortKees vanBrouwerErik. 2002. The non-trivial choice between innovation indicators. Economics of Innovation and New Technology11(2): 109–21.
23.
LamAlice. 2004. Organizational innovation. In FagerbergJanMoweryDavid C.NelsonRichard R. (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Innovation, pp. 115–147. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
MachinStephenReenenJohn Van. 1998. Technology and changes in skill structure: Evidence from seven OECD countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics113(4): 1215–44.
25.
MalgariniMarcoManciniMassimoPacelliLia. 2013. Temporary hires and innovative investments. Applied Economics45(17): 2361–70.
26.
MilesIan. 2010. Service innovation. In MaglioPaul P.KieliszewskiCheryl A.SpohrerJames C. (Eds.), Handbook of Service Science, pp. 511–33. New York: Springer.
27.
Muñoz de BustilloRafaelFernández-MacíasEnriqueEsteveFernandoAntónJose-Ignacio. 2011. E pluribus unum? A critical survey of job quality indicators. Socio-Economic Review9(3): 447–75.
28.
Muñoz de BustilloRafaelGrandeRafaelFernández-MacíasEnrique. 2016. Innovation and job quality. An initial exploration. QuInnE Working Paper WP5:1. Version 2. Quality of Jobs and Innovation Generated Employment Outcomes.
29.
[OECD] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2005. Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd edition. A joint publication of OECD and Eurostat. Paris: OECD Publishing.
30.
OstermanPaul. 2013. Introduction to the special issue on job quality: What does it mean and how might we think about it?ILR Review66(4): 739–52.
31.
RosenbaumPaul R.RubinDonald B. 1983. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika70(1): 41–55.
32.
RuberyJillGrimshawDamian. 2001. ICTs and employment: The problem of job quality. International Labour Review140(2): 165–92.
33.
Sousa-PozaAlfonsoSousa-PozaAndres A. 2000. Well-being at work: A cross-national analysis of the levels and determinants of job satisfaction. Journal of Socio-Economics29(6): 517–38.
34.
UgurMehmetChurchillSefa AwaworyiSolomonEdna. 2018. Technological innovation and employment in derived labour demand models: A hierarchical meta-regression analysis. Journal of Economic Surveys32(1): 50–82.
35.
Van ReenenJohn. 1996. The creation and capture of rents: Wages and innovation in a panel of U.K. companies. Quarterly Journal of Economics111(1): 195–226.
36.
Van ReenenJohn. 1997. Employment and technological innovation: Evidence from U.K. manufacturing firms. Journal of Labor Economics15(2): 255–84.
37.
VergeerRobertKleinknechtAlfred. 2014. Do labour market reforms reduce labour productivity growth? A panel data analysis of 20 OECD countries (1960–2004). International Labour Review153(3): 365–93.
38.
VivarelliMarco. 2014. Innovation, employment and skills in advanced and developing countries: A survey of economic literature. Journal of Economic Issues48(1): 123–54.
39.
ZhouHaiboDekkerRonaldKleinknechtAlfred. 2011. Flexible labor and innovation performance: Evidence from longitudinal firm-level data. Industrial and Corporate Change20(3): 941–68.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
