This article examines discrimination based on hukou status, a legal construct that segregates locals and migrants in urban China. Local and migrant household helpers were recruited as experimental participants to interact in a standard gift exchange game (GEG) as well as a new variant of the GEG, called the wage promising game (WPG). The WPG uses non-binding wage offers and final wages that employers set after observing effort. In the GEG, both statistical and preference-based discrimination may motivate employers to offer lower wages to migrants than to locals, whereas in the WPG the statistical motive is excluded. Results reveal discrimination against migrants and show that preference-based discrimination is an important employer motive.
AbelerJohannesAltmannSteffenKubeSebastianWibralMatthias. 2010. Gift exchange and workers’ fairness concerns: When equality is unfair. Journal of the European Economic Association8(6): 1299–1324.
2.
AfridiFarzanaLiSherry X.RenYufei. 2015. Social identity and inequality: The impact of China’s hukou system. Journal of Public Economics123: 17–29.
3.
AkerlofGeorge A.KrantonRachel E.2000. Economics and identity. Quarterly Journal of Economics115(3): 715–53.
BeckerGary S.1971. The Economics of Discrimination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
Ben-NerAvnerMcCallBrian P.StephaneMassoudWangHua. 2009. Identity and in-group/out-group differentiation in work and giving behaviors: Experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization72(1): 153–70.
7.
BertrandMarianneMullainathanSendhil. 2004. Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. American Economic Review94(4): 991–1013.
8.
BertrandMarianneChughDollyMullainathanSendhil. 2005. Implicit discrimination. American Economic Review95(2): 94–98.
9.
BoalWilliam M.RansomMichael R.1997. Monopsony in the labor market. Journal of Economic Literature35(1): 86–112.
10.
ChanKam W.2010. The household registration system and migrant labor in China: Notes on a debate. Population and Development Review36(2): 357–64.
11.
ChanKam W.2015. Five decades of the Chinese hukou system. In IredaleRobyn R.GuoFei (Eds.), Handbook of Chinese Migration: Identity and Wellbeing, pp. 23–47. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
12.
ChanKam W.BuckinghamWill. 2008. Is China abolishing the hukou system?China Quarterly195: 582–606.
13.
ChanKam W.ZhangLi. 1999. The hukou system and rural-urban migration in China: Processes and changes. China Quarterly160: 818–55.
14.
CharnessGarryDufwenbergMartin. 2006. Promises and partnership. Econometrica74(6): 1579–1601.
15.
DémurgerSylvieGurgandMarcLiShiYueXiming. 2009. Migrants as second-class workers in urban China? A decomposition analysis. Journal of Comparative Economics37(4): 610–28.
16.
FehrErnstGoetteLorenzZehnderChristian. 2009. A behavioral account of the labor market: The role of fairness concerns. Annual Review of Economics1(1): 355–84.
17.
FehrErnstKirchsteigerGeorgRiedlArno. 1993. Does fairness prevent market clearing? An experimental investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics108(2): 437–59.
18.
FehrErnstKleinAlexanderSchmidtKlaus M.2007. Fairness and contract design. Econometrica75(1): 121–54.
19.
FinnaneAntonia. 1993. The origins of prejudice: The malintegration of Subei in late imperial China. Comparative Studies in Society and History35(2): 211–38.
FrijtersPaulGregoryRobert G.MengXin. 2015. The role of rural migrants in the Chinese urban economy. In DustmannChristian (Ed.), Migration: Economic Change, Social Challenge, pp. 33–67. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
22.
GächterSimonFehrErnst. 2002. Fairness in the labour market—A survey of experimental results. In BolleFriedelLehmann-WaffenschmidtMarco (Eds.), Surveys in Experimental Economics. Bargaining, Cooperation and Election Markets, pp. 95–132. Berlin: Physica, Heidelberg.
23.
GneezyUri. 2005. Deception: The role of consequences. American Economic Review95(1): 384–94.
24.
GuangLeiKongFanmin. 2010. Rural prejudice and gender discrimination in China’s urban job market. In WhyteMartin K. (Ed.), One Country, Two Societies: Rural-Urban Inequality in Contemporary China, pp. 241–64. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
HalevyNirBornsteinGarySagivLilach. 2008. In-group love and out-group hate as motives for individual participation in intergroup conflict: A new game paradigm. Psychological Science19(4): 405–11.
26.
Hennig-SchmidtHeikeIrlenbuschBerndRilkeRainer M.WalkowitzGari. 2018. Asymmetric outside options in ultimatum bargaining: A systematic analysis. International Journal of Game Theory47(1): 301–29.
27.
HirschBorisJahnElke J.2015. Is there monopsonistic discrimination against immigrants?Industrial and Labor Relations Review68(3): 501–28.
28.
HonigEmily. 1990. Invisible inequalities: The status of Subei people in contemporary Shanghai. China Quarterly122: 273–92.
29.
HotchkissJulie L.Quispe-AgnoliMyriam. 2012. Employer monopsony power in the labor market for undocumented workers. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Working Paper No. 2009-14d. Atlanta: Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
30.
KuhnPeterShenKailing. 2015. Do employers prefer migrant workers? Evidence from a Chinese job board. IZA Journal of Labor Economics4: 22.
31.
ListJohn A.2007. Field experiments: A bridge between lab and naturally occurring data. BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy5(2): 1–45.
32.
LiuElaineFrijtersPaulKongTao Sherry. 2012. Who is coming to the experiment? A cautionary tale from China. Working Papers 201309854. Department of Economics, University of Houston.
33.
LuZhigangSongShunfeng. 2006. Rural-urban migration and wage determination: The case of Tianjin, China. China Economic Review17(3): 337–45.
34.
Maurer-FazioMargaret. 2012. Ethnic discrimination in China’s internet job board labor market. IZA Journal of Migration1: 12.
35.
Maurer-FazioMargaretLeiLei. 2015. As rare as a panda: How facial attractiveness, gender, and occupation affect interview callbacks at Chinese firms. International Journal of Manpower36(1): 68–85.
MengXinZhangJunsen. 2001. The two-tier labor market in urban China: Occupational segregation and wage differentials between urban residents and rural migrants in Shanghai. Journal of Comparative Economics29(3): 485–504.
38.
National Bureau of Statistics of China. 2010. China Population and Employment Statistics Yearbook 2010. Beijing: China Statistics Press.
39.
NikiforakisNikosOechsslerJörgShahAnwar. 2014. Hierarchy, coercion, and exploitation: An experimental analysis. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization97: 155–68.
40.
ReesAlbert. 1993. The role of fairness in wage determination. Journal of Labor Economics11(1): 243–52.
41.
RosazJulie. 2012. Biased information and effort. Economic Inquiry50(2): 484–501.
42.
SchmittPamela M.2004. On perceptions of fairness: The role of valuations, outside options, and information in ultimatum bargaining games. Experimental Economics7(1): 49–73.
43.
StaigerDouglas O.SpetzJoannePhibbsCiaran S.2010. Is there monopsony in the labor market? Evidence from a natural experiment. Journal of Labor Economics28(2): 211–36.
44.
WangFengZuoXuejin. 1999. Inside China’s cities: Institutional barriers and opportunities for urban migrants. American Economic Review89(2): 276–80.
45.
WangXiaozhouOropesaRalph S.FirebaughGlenn. 2013. Permanent migrants to cities in China: Hukou origin and earnings among men in an era of economic transformation. Migration and Development2(1): 37–56.
46.
ZhangHuafeng. 2010. The hukou system’s constraints on migrant workers’ job mobility in Chinese cities. China Economic Review21(1): 51–64.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
