Effective 2001, California passed the Prudence Kay Poppink Act, which broadened California’s disability employment discrimination law to cover individuals with less-severe disabilities by lowering the burden of proof to establish a disability. Using both difference-in-differences and difference-in-difference-in-differences regression analyses and data from the Current Population Survey, the author estimates how this act affected the labor market outcomes for individuals with disabilities. The results suggest that the act significantly increased employment for individuals with disabilities, with the effect persisting at least partially up to six years later.
AbadieAlbertoDiamondAlexisHainmuellerJens. 2010. Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: Estimating the effect of California’s Tobacco Control Program. Journal of the American Statistical Association105(490): 493–505.
2.
AcemogluDaronAngristJoshua D.2001. Consequences of employment protection? The case of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Journal of Political Economy109(5): 915–57.
3.
AdamsScott J.2004. Age discrimination legislation and the employment of older workers. Labour Economics11: 219–41.
4.
BeegleKathleenStockWendy A.2003. The labor market effects of disability discrimination laws. Journal of Human Resources38: 806–59.
5.
BellDavidHeitmuellerAxel. 2009. The Disability Discrimination Act in the UK: Helping or hindering employment among the disabled?Journal of Health Economics28(2): 465–80.
6.
BertrandMarianneDufloEstherMullainathanSendhil. 2004. How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates?Quarterly Journal of Economics119(1): 249–75.
7.
BlochFarrell. 1994. Antidiscrimination Law and Minority Employment: Recruitment Practices and Regulatory Constraints. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
BoundJohn. 1991. Self-reported versus objective measures of health in retirement models. Journal of Human Resources26: 106–38.
9.
BoundJohnBurkhauserRichard V.1999. Economic analysis of transfer programs targeted on people with disabilities. In AshenfelterOrleyCardDavid (Eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 3C, pp. 3417–528. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
10.
BoundJohnWaidmannTimothy. 2002. Accounting for recent declines in employment rates among working-aged men and women with disabilities. Journal of Human Resources37(2): 231–50.
11.
BrewerMikeCrossleyThomas F.JoyceRobert. 2013. Inference with difference-in-differences revisited. IZA Discussion Paper No. 7742. Bonn, Germany: Institute of Labor Economics.
12.
BurgdorfRobert L.1997. Substantially limited: Protection from disability discrimination: The special treatment model and misconstructions of the definition of disability. Villanova Law Review42(2): 409–586.
13.
BurkhauserRichard V.HoutenvilleAndrew J.WittenburgDavid C.2003. A user’s guide to current statistics on the employment of people with disabilities. In StapletonDavid C.BurkhauserRichard V. (Eds.). The Decline in Employment of People with Disabilities: A Policy Puzzle, pp. 23–86. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
14.
BurkhauserRichard V.DalyMary C.HoutenvilleAndrew J.NargisNigar. 2002. Self-reported work-limitation data: What they can and cannot tell us. Demography39: 541–55.
15.
BurnIan.2016. Legal differences in state non-discrimination laws and the effect of employment protections for gays and lesbians. Mimeo.
16.
ButtonPatrickArmourPhilipHollandsSimon. 2017. A comprehensive analysis of the effects of US disability discrimination laws on the employment of the disabled population. Mimeo.
17.
CameronA. ColinMillerDouglas L.2015. A practitioner’s guide to cluster-robust inference. Journal of Human Resources50(2): 317–72.
18.
CameronA. ColinGelbachJonah B.MillerDouglas L.2008. Bootstrap-based improvements for inference with clustered errors. Review of Economics and Statistics90(3): 414–27.
19.
CardDavidKruegerAlan B.1994. Minimum wages and employment: A case study of the fast food industry in New Jersey and Pennsylvania. American Economic Review84(4): 772–93.
20.
CarpenterChristopher S.2006. The effects of employment protection for obese people. Industrial Relations45(3): 393–415.
21.
ColkerRuth. 1999. The Americans with Disabilities Act: A windfall for defendants. Harvard Civil Rights Civil Liberties Law Review34: 99–162.
22.
ConleyTimothy G.TaberChristopher R.2011. Inference with “difference in differences” with a small number of policy changes. Review of Economics and Statistics93(1): 113–25.
23.
DalyMary C.FurlongFred. 2002. Profile of a recession: The U.S. and California. San Francisco, CA: Federal Reserve Board of San Francisco Economic Letter #2002-04.
24.
DeLeireThomas. 2000. The wage and employment effects of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Journal of Human Resources35(4): 693–715.
25.
DonaldStephen G.LangKevin. 2007. Inference with difference-in-differences and other panel data. Review of Economics and Statistics89(2): 221–33.
26.
DonohueJohn J.2007. Antidiscrimination law. In PolinskyA. MitchellShavellSteven (Eds.), Handbook of Law and Economics, Vol. 27, pp. 1387–472. North Holland: Elsevier.
27.
DonohueJohn J.IIIHeckmanJames. 1991. Continuous versus episodic change: The impact of civil rights policy on the economic status of blacks. Journal of Economic Literature29(4): 1603–643.
28.
FarberHenry S.VallettaRobert G.2015. Do extended unemployment benefits lengthen unemployment spells? Evidence from recent cycles in the U.S. labor market. Journal of Human Resources50(4): 873–909.
29.
FloodSarahKingMiriamRugglesStevenWarrenJ. Robert. 2015. Integrated public use microdata series, Current Population Survey: Version 4.0 [Machine-readable database]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
30.
HotchkissJulie L.2004. A closer look at the employment impact of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Journal of Human Resources39(4): 887–911.
31.
HoutenvilleAndrew J.BurkhauserRichard V.2004. Did the employment of people with disabilities decline in the 1990s, and was the ADA responsible: A replication and robustness check of Acemoglu and Angrist (2001). Ithaca, NY: Research and Rehabilitation Training Center for Economic Research on Employment Policy for Person with Disabilities, August2004.
32.
JollsChristinePrescottJ. J.2004. Disaggregating employment protection: The case of disability discrimination. NBER Working Paper No. 10740. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
33.
KapteynArieSmithJames P.SoestArthur van. 2011. Work disability, work, and justification bias in Europe and the United States. In WiseDavid A. (Ed.), Explorations in the Economics of Aging, pp. 269–312. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34.
KerkhofsMarcelLindeboomMaarten. 1995. Subjective health measures and state dependent reporting errors. Health Economics4(3): 221–35.
35.
KliesenKevin L.2003. The 2001 recession: How was it different and what developments may have caused it?St. Louis, MO: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, Vol. 85, No. 5 (September/October), pp. 23–38.
36.
KreiderBrent. 1999. Latent work disability and reporting bias. Journal of Human Resources34(4): 734–69.
37.
KreiderBrentPepperJohn V.2007. Disability and employment: Reevaluating the evidence in light of reporting errors. Journal of the American Statistical Association102(478): 432–41.
38.
KruseDouglasSchurLisa. 2003. Employment of people with disabilities following the ADA. Industrial Relations42(1): 31–64.
39.
LaheyJoanna N.2008. State age protection laws and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. Journal of Law and Economics51(3): 433–60.
40.
LongAlex B.2008. Introducing the new and improved Americans with Disabilities Act: Assessing the ADA Amendments Act of 2008. Northwestern University Law Review103: 217–29.
41.
MacKinnonJames G.WebbMatthew D.2017. Wild bootstrap inference for wildly different cluster sizes. Journal of Applied Econometrics32: 233–54.
42.
MartellMichael E.2013. Do ENDAs end discrimination for behaviorally gay men?Journal of Labor Research34(2): 147–69.
43.
MeerJonathanWestJeremy. 2016. Effects of the minimum wage on employment dynamics. Journal of Human Resources51(2): 500–522.
44.
MoraRicardoReggioIliana. 2013. Treatment effect identification using alternative parallel assumptions. Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Working Papers, 12-33 (March).
45.
NeumarkDavid. 2009. The Age Discrimination in Employment Act and the challenge of population aging. Research on Aging31(1): 41–68.
46.
NeumarkDavidButtonPatrick. 2014. Did age discrimination protections help older workers weather the Great Recession?Journal of Policy Analysis and Management33(4): 566–601.
47.
NeumarkDavidGrijalvaDiego. 2016. The employment effects of state hiring credits. Industrial and Labor Relations Review Online First. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793916683930.
48.
NeumarkDavidPowersElizabeth. 1998. The effect of means-tested income support for the elderly on pre-retirement saving: Evidence from the SSI program in the U.S. Journal of Public Economics68(2): 181–206.
49.
NeumarkDavidSongJoanne. 2013. Do stronger age discrimination laws make Social Security reforms more effective?Journal of Public Economics108: 1–16.
50.
NeumarkDavidStockWendy A.1999. Age discrimination laws and labor market efficiency. Journal of Political Economy107(5): 1081–125.
51.
NeumarkDavidStockWendy A.2006. The labor market effects of sex and race discrimination laws. Economic Inquiry44(3): 385–419.
52.
NeumarkDavidSongJoanneButtonPatrick. 2017. Does protecting older workers from discrimination make it harder to get hired? Evidence from disability discrimination laws. Research on Aging39(1): 29–63.
53.
OguzogluUmut. 2012. Is there a better measure of self-assessed disability?Applied Economics Letters19: 1335–38.
54.
PosnerRichard A.1995. Aging and Old Age. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
55.
ReberSarah J.2005. Court-ordered desegregation: Successes and failures integrating American schools since Brown versus Board of Education. Journal of Human Resources40(3): 559–90.
56.
SchurLisa A.2003. Barriers or opportunities? The causes of contingent and part-time work among people with disabilities. Industrial Relations42(4): 589–622.
57.
ThompkinsAllison V.2015. Did the ADA evolve into our ramp to full employment? An analysis of 18 years of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Journal of Contemporary Management4(1): 13–32.
