Past research has provided mixed evidence on the relationship between High-Performance Work Practices (HPWPs) and wages. Drawing from more than 1,800 interviews with the HR managers in a stratified sample of Italian manufacturing plants collected in 2008, the authors argue that the results are inconclusive unless the configurations of the HPWPs and the mechanisms underpinning employee involvement are taken into account. Their results show that HPWPs are associated with higher wages for core employees only when they align with an ideal type, and they result in higher wage equality only when they emphasize training, competence enhancement, and power delegation.
AngristJoshua D.1991. Instrumental variables estimation of average treatment effects in econometrics and epidemiology. NBER Technical Working Paper No. 115. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
2.
AppelbaumEileenBattRosemary. 1994. The New American Workplace: Transforming Work Systems in the United States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press/ILR Press.
3.
AppelbaumEileenBaileyThomasBergPeterKallebergArne. 2000. Manufacturing Advantage: Why High Performance Work Systems Pay Off. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press/ILR Press.
4.
ArthurJeffrey B.1992. The link between business strategy and industrial relations systems in American steel minimills. Industrial and Labor Relations Review45(3): 488–506.
5.
ArthurJeffrey B.1994. Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover. Academy of Management Journal37(3): 670–87.
6.
AskenazyPhilippeCaroliEve. 2010. Innovative work practices, information technologies and working conditions: Evidence for France. Industrial Relations49(4): 544–65.
7.
BaeKiu-SikChumaHiroyukiKatoTakaoKimDong-BaeOhashiIsao. 2011. High performance work practices and employee voice: A comparison of Japanese and Korean workers. Industrial Relations50(1): 1–29.
8.
BattRosemary. 2001. Explaining wage inequality in telecommunication services: Customer segmentation, human resource practices, and union decline. Industrial and Labor Relations Review54(2A): 425–49.
9.
BauerThomas K.BenderStefan. 2001. Flexible work systems and the structure of wages: Evidence from matched employer-employee data. IZA Discussion Paper No. 353. Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
10.
Bayo-MorionesAlbertoGaldón-SánchezJosé EnriqueMartinez-de-MorentinSara. 2010. The diffusion of pay for performance across occupations. IZA Discussion Paper No. 4839. Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
11.
BeckerBrian E.GerhartBarry A.1996. The impact of human resource management on organizational performance: Progress and prospects. Academy of Management Journal39(4): 779–801.
12.
BeckerBrian E.HuselidMark A.PickusPeter S.SprattMichael F.1997. HR as a source of shareholder value. Human Resource Management36(1): 389–447.
13.
BeckermanWilfredJenkinsonTim. 1990. Wage bargaining and profitability: A disaggregative analysis. Labour4(3): 57–78.
14.
BlackSandraLynchLisaKrivelyovaAnya. 2004. How workers fare when employers innovate. Industrial Relations43(1): 44–66.
15.
BlasiJoseph R.KruseDouglas L.2006. U.S. high-performance work practices at century’s end. Industrial Relations54(4): 547–78.
16.
BloomNicholasVan ReenenJohn. 2007. Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics122(4): 1351–1408.
17.
BoxallPeter. 2012. High-performance work systems: What, why, how and for whom?Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources50: 169–86.
18.
BoxallPeterMackyKeith. 2007. High-performance work systems and organizational performance: Bridging theory and practice. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources45(3): 261–70.
19.
BoxallPeterMackyKeith. 2009. Research and theory on high-performance work systems: Progressing the high-involvement stream. Human Resource Management Journal19(1): 3–23.
20.
CappelliPeter. 2012. A cautionary view of construct validity. Human Resource Management Review22: 149–51.
21.
CappelliPeterNeumarkDavid. 2001. Do “high performance” work practices improve establishment-level outcomes?Industrial and Labor Relations Review54(4): 737–75.
22.
ChadwickClint. 2010. Theoretic insights on the nature of performance synergies in human resource systems: Toward greater precision. Human Resource Management Review20: 85–101.
23.
ChiuTomFangDong PingChenJohnWangYaoJerisChristopher. 2001. A Robust and Scalable Clustering Algorithm for Mixed Type Attributes in Large Database Environment. Proceedings of the seventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, pp. 263–68. New York: ACM.
24.
ChuangEmmelineDillJanetteMorganJennifer CraftKonradThomas R.2012. A configurational approach to the relationship between high-performance work practices and frontline health care worker outcomes. Health Services Research47(4): 1460–81.
25.
ColvinAlexanderBattRosemaryKatzHarry C.2001. How high performance work human resource practices and workforce unionization affect managerial pay. Personnel Psychology54(4): 903–34.
26.
CombsJamesHallAngelaKetchenDavidLiuYongmei. 2006. How much do high-performance work practices matter? A meta-analysis of their effects on organizational performance. Personnel Psychology59: 501–28.
27.
CristiniAnnalisaErikssonTorPozzoliDavide. 2013. High-performance management practices and employee outcomes in Denmark. Scottish Journal of Political Economy60(3): 232–66.
28.
DaftRichard L.LengelRobert H.1983. Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design. Office of Naval Research, Technical Report Series, TR-ONR-DL-02. Department of Management, Texas A&M University.
29.
DeleryJohn E.1998. Issues of fit in strategic human resource management: Implications for research. Human Resource Management Review8(3): 289–309.
30.
DeleryJohn E.DotyD. Harold. 1996. Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Academy of Management Journal39(4): 802–35.
31.
DotyD. HaroldGlickWilliam H.1994. Typologies as a unique form of theory building: Toward improved understanding and modeling. Academy of Management Review19(2): 230–51.
32.
ForthJohnMillwardNeil. 2004. High involvement management and pay in Britain. Industrial Relations43: 98–119.
33.
FreemanRichard B.KleinerMorris M.2000. Who benefits most from employee involvement: Firms or workers?American Economic Review90: 219–23.
GerhartBarry A.2007. Horizontal and vertical fit in human resource systems. In OstroffCheriJudgeTimothy A. (Eds.). Perspectives on Organizational Fit. SIOP Organizational Frontiers Series. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Taylor & Francis Group.
36.
GerhartBarry A.2012. Construct validity, causality, and policy recommendations: The case of high performance work practices systems. Human Resource Management Review22: 157–60.
37.
GerhartBarry A.TrevorCharlie O.GrahamMary E.1996. New directions in compensation research: Synergies, risk, and survival. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management14: 143–203.
38.
GodardJohn. 2004. A critical assessment of the high-performance paradigm. British Journal of Industrial Relations42(2): 349–78.
39.
GodardJohn. 2010. What is best for workers? The implications of workplace and human resource management practices revisited. Industrial Relations49(3): 46–488.
40.
GongYapingLawKenneth S.ChangSongXinKatherine R.2009. Human resources management and firm performance: The differential role of managerial affective and continuance commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology94(1): 263–75.
41.
GooderhamPaul N.NordhaugOddRingdalKristen. 1999. Institutional and rational determinants of organizational practices: Human resource management in European firms. Administrative Science Quarterly44: 507–531.
42.
GreenanNathalie. 2003. Organisational change, technology, employment and skills: An empirical study of French manufacturing. Cambridge Journal of Economics27: 287–316.
43.
GresovChristopherDrazinRobert. 1997. Equifinality: Functional equivalence in organization design. Academy of Management Review22(2): 403–28.
44.
GrittiPaolaLeoniRiccardo. 2010. Pratiche lavorative, relazioni industriali e propensione alle innovazioni. Quaderni di ricerca del Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche H.P. Minsky, 2010-1. University of Bergamo, Bergamo.
45.
GuthrieJames P.SpellChester S.NyamoriRobert Ochoki. 2002. Correlates and consequences of high involvement work practices: The role of competitive strategy. International Journal of Human Resource Management13(1): 183–97.
46.
HandelMichael J.GittlemanMaury. 2004. Is there a wage payoff to innovative work practices?Industrial Relations43(1): 67–98.
47.
HandelMichael J.LevineDavid I.2004. The effects of new work practices on workers. Industrial Relations43(1): 1–43.
48.
HorganJustineMühlauPeter. 2006. Human resource systems and employee performance in Ireland and the Netherlands: A test of the complementarity hypothesis. International Journal of Human Resource Management17(3): 414–39.
49.
HunterLarry W.LafkasJohn J.2003. Opening the box: Information technology, work practices, and wages. Industrial and Labor Relations Review56(2): 224–43.
50.
HunterLarry W.BernhardtAnnetteHughesKatherine L.SkuratowiczEva. 2001. It’s not just the ATMs: Technology, firm strategies, jobs, and earnings in retail banking. Industrial and Labor Relations Review54(2A): 402–24.
51.
HuselidMark A.1995. The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal38(3): 635–72.
52.
IchniowskiCaseyShawKathryn L.2009. Insider econometrics: Empirical studies of how management matters. NBER Working Paper No.15618. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
53.
IchniowskiCaseyShawKathryn L.PrennushiGiovanna. 1997. The effects of human resource management practices on productivity: a Study of steel finishing lines. American Economic Review87: 291–313.
LeoniRiccardo. 2012. Workplace design, complementarities among work practices and the formation of key competencies. Evidence from Italian employees. Industrial and Labor Relations Review65(2): 316–49.
56.
LeoniRiccardoGajAlessandro. 2010. Apprendimento informale e sviluppo delle competenze: il ruolo dei disegni organizzativi delle imprese. Implicazioni per le politiche industriali. Politica Economica1: 55–92.
57.
LepakDavid P.SnellScott A.1999. The human resource architecture: Toward a theory of human capital allocation and development. Academy of Management Review24(1): 31–48.
58.
MacDuffieJohn Paul. 1995. Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: Organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry. Industrial and Labor Relations Review48(2): 197–221.
59.
MackyKeithBoxallPeter. 2008. High-involvement work processes, work intensification and employee well-being: A study of New Zealand worker experiences. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources46(1): 38–55.
60.
MonksKathyLoughnaneMichael. 2006. Unwrapping the HRM bundle: HR system design in an Irish power utility. International Journal of Human Resource Management17(11): 1926–41.
61.
OstermanPaul. 1994. How common is workplace transformation and who adopts it?Industrial and Labor Relations Review2: 173–88.
62.
OstermanPaul. 2000. Work reorganization in an era of restructuring: Trends in diffusion and effects on employee welfare. Industrial and Labor Relations Review53(2): 179–96.
63.
OstermanPaul. 2006. The wage effects of high performance work organization in manufacturing. Industrial and Labor Relations Review59(2): 187–204.
PaauweJaap. 2009. HRM and performance: Achievements, methodological issues and prospects. Journal of Management Studies46(1): 129–42.
66.
PayneG. Tyge. 2006. Examining configurations and firm performance in a suboptimal equifinality context. Organization Science17(6): 756–70.
67.
Perry-SmithJill E.BlumTerry C.2000. Work-family human resource bundles and perceived organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal43(6): 1107–17.
68.
PfefferJeffrey. 2007. Human resources from an organizational behavior perspective: Some paradoxes explained. Journal of Economic Perspectives21(4): 115–34.
69.
RamsayHarvieScholariosDoraHarleyBill. 2000. Employees and high-performance work systems: Testing inside the black box. British Journal of Industrial Relations38(4): 501–31.
70.
RizovMarianCroucherRichard. 2009. Human resource management and performance in European firms. Cambridge Journal of Economics33: 253–72.
71.
SubramonyMahesh. 2009. A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between HRM bundles and firm performance. Human Resource Management48(5): 745–68.
72.
TakeuchiRikiChenGiladLepakDavid P.2009. Through the looking glass of a social system: Cross-level effects of high performance work systems on employees’ attitudes. Personnel Psychology62(1): 1–29.
73.
TaplinIan M.2006. Strategic change and organisational restructuring: How managers negotiate change initiatives. Journal of International Management12(3): 284–301.
74.
TohSoo MinCampionMichael A.MorgesonFrederick P.2008. Human resource configurations: Investigating fit with the organizational context. Journal of Applied Psychology93(4): 864–82.
75.
VenkatramanN.PrescottJohn E.1990. Environment-strategy coalignment: An empirical test of its performance implications. Strategic Management Journal11(1): 1–23.
76.
WallToby D.WoodStephen J.2005. The romance of human resource management and business performance, and the case for big science. Human Relations58(4): 429–62.
77.
WeickKarl E.1979. The Social Psychology of Organizing. 2nd edition.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
78.
YoundtMark A.SnellScott A.DeanJames W.Jr.LepakDavid P.2006. Human resource management, manufacturing strategy, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal39(4): 836–66.
