AmosséThomasPignoniMaria-Teresa. 2006. La transformation du paysage syndical depuis 1945, Données sociales La société française. INSEE, pp. 405–12.
2.
AnxoDominique. 2013. Working time and work-life balance policies: The Swedish experience. Paper for the Korean Labor Foundation.
3.
AnxoDominiqueFranzChristineKümmerlingAngelika. 2013. Working time distribution and preferences across the life course: A European perspective. Economia & Lavoro Anno2: 77–106.
4.
BardasiElenaGornickJanet C.2008. Working for less? Women’s part-time wage penalties across countries. Feminist Economics14(1): 37–72. doi:10.1080/13545700701716649.
5.
BaretChristopheLehndorffSteffenSparksLeigh (Eds.). 2000. Flexible working in food retailing: A comparison between France, Germany, the United Kingdom and Japan. Routledge Studies in Retailing, Vol. 1. London: Routledge.
6.
BellLindaFreemanRichard B.2001. The incentive for working hard: Explaining hours worked differences in the US and Germany. Labor Economics8(2): 181–202.
7.
BergPeterPiszczekMatthew. 2014. The limits of equality bargaining in the USA. Journal of Industrial Relations56(2): 170–89. doi:10.1177/0022185613517469.
8.
BergPeterAppelbaumEileenBaileyThomasKallebergArne L.2004. Contesting time: International comparisons of employee control of working time. Industrial & Labor Relations Review57(3): 331–49.
9.
BergPeterKossekEllen ErnstMisraKaumudiBelmanDale. 2014. Work–life flexibility policies: Do unions affect employee access and use?Industrial & Labor Relations Review67(1): 111–37.
10.
BernhardtAnnetteMilkmanRuth2009. Broken laws, unprotected workers: Violations of employment and labor laws in America’s cities. Report. New York: National Employment Law Project.
11.
BjorklundAndersFreemanRichard B.1994. Generating equality and eliminating poverty, the Swedish way. NBER Working Paper No. 4945. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. December.
12.
[BLS] United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2010. National Compensation Survey National Earnings Bulletin, Table 2: Full-time and part-time workers: Mean hourly earnings for major occupational groups. Accessed at http://www.bls.gov/ncs/ocs/sp/nctb1476.pdf (March2014).
13.
[BLS] United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2013. Employee benefits in the United States: March 2013. News release, July 17. Accessed at http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/ebs2.pdf (March2014).
14.
BoschGerhard. 2004. Towards a new standard employment relationship in Western Europe. British Journal of Industrial Relations42(4): 617–36.
15.
BoschGerhard. 2011. The German labour market after the financial crisis: Miracle or just a good policy mix? In Vaughan-WhiteheadDaniel (Ed.), Work Inequalities in the Crisis? Evidence from Europe, pp. 243–77. Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar Publisher.
16.
BoschGerhardLehndorffSteffen. 2001. Working-time reduction and employment: Experiences in Europe and economic policy recommendations. Cambridge Journal of Economics25: 209–43.
17.
BoschGerhardDawkinsPeterMichonFrançois. 1994. Times Are Changing: Working Time in 14 Industrialised Countries. Geneva: International Institute for Labor Studies.
18.
BoschGerhardMayhewKenGautiéJérôme. 2010. Industrial relations, legal regulations, and wage setting. In GautiéJérômeSchmittJohn (Eds.), Low-Wage Work in the Wealthy World, pp. 91–146. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
19.
BousheyHeather. 2011. The role of the government in work-family conflict. Future of Children21(2): 163–90.
20.
CabritaJorgeda BinoCamilla Galli. 2013. Developments in collectively agreed working time, 2012. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.
21.
CarréFrançoiseTillyChrisvan KlaverenMaartenVoss-DahmDorothea. 2010. Retail jobs in comparative perspective. In GautiéJérômeSchmittJohn (Eds.), Low-Wage Work in the Wealthy World, pp. 211–68. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
22.
[CEE] Centre D’Etudes De L’Emploi. 2009. Chomage partiel et licenciements économiques. Connaissance de l’emploi, Le 4 pages du CEE, No. 63. March.
23.
[Dares] Direction de l’animation de la recherche, des études et des statistiques. 2009. Le recours au chomage partiel entre 1995 et 2005. Document d’études Nr. 135. Paris. Ministère du travail, de l’emploi et de la santé.
24.
De BandtOlivierPavotJeanne. 2009. French labour market outlook. Presentation Berlin. October16.
25.
[DOL] United States Department of Labor. 2013. New online resources to promote the expansion of short-time compensation, or work-sharing, programs nationwide announced by US Labor Department. News release, November14. Accessed at http://www.dol.gov/opa/media/press/eta/ETA20132126.htm (March2014).
26.
DufourChristianHegeAdelheid. 2010. Evolutions et perspectives des systèmes de négociation collective et de leurs acteurs: six cas européens. Paris: Institut de recherches économiques et sociales.
[FWI] Families and Work Institute and [SHRM] Society for Human Resource Management. 2012. Workflex: The Essential Guide to Effective and Flexible Workplaces. Alexandria, VA: Society of Human Resource Management.
30.
GautiéJérôme. 2011. France: Protecting the insiders in the crisis and forgetting the outsiders? In Vaughan-WhiteheadDaniel (Ed.), Work Inequalities in the Crisis: Evidence from Europe, ILO Geneva, pp. 225–32. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
31.
GoodsteinJerry. 1995. Employer involvement in eldercare: An organizational adaptation perspective. Academy of Management38(6): 1657–71.
32.
HarveyMark. 1999. Economies of time: A framework for analysing the restructuring of employment relations. In FelsteadAlanJewsonNick (Eds.), Global Trends in Flexible Labour. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
33.
HeyerÉricPlaneMathieu. 2012. Impact des allègements de cotisations patronales des bas salaires sur l’emploi. L’apport des modèles macroéconomiques, Revue de l’OFCE. Débats et politiques126: 123–40.
34.
[ILO] International Labour Organization. 2004. Conditions of work and employment programme: Overtime. Information Sheet No. WT-2. Geneva: International Labour Office.
35.
IngramPaulSimonsTal. 1995. Institutional and resource dependence determinants of responsiveness to work-family issues. Academy of Management Journal38(5): 1466–82.
36.
KochanThomas A.2000. Presidential address: Building a new social contract at work: A call to action. In VoosPaula B. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Forty-Ninth Annual Meeting of the Industrial Relations Research Association. Champaign, IL: Industrial Relations Research Association.
37.
KümmerlingAngelikaLehndorffSteffenCoppinLauraRamioulMonique. 2009. Social dialogue, working time arrangements and work–life balance in European companies. Establishment survey on working time and work–life balance 2004–2005. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.
38.
LabbéDominique. 1996. Syndicats et syndiqués en France depuis, 1945. Paris: L’Harmattan.
39.
LallementMichel. 2009. Les régulations du temps de travail en France. Informations sociales3(153): 56–64.
40.
LambertSusan. 2008. Passing the buck: Labor flexibility practices that transfer risk onto hourly workers. Human Relations61(9): 1203–27.
41.
LeeSangheonMcCannDeirdreMessengerJon C.2007. Working time around the world. Trends in working hours, laws and policies in a global comparative perspective. Geneva: ILO.
McGinnityFrancesMcManusPatricia. 2007. Paying the price for reconciling work and family life: Comparing the wage penalty for women’s part-time work in Britain, Germany and the United States. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice9(2): 115–34.
44.
MilkmanRuthAppelbaumEileen2013. Unfinished Business: Paid Family Leave in California and the Future of U.S. Work-Family Policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press/ILR Press.
45.
MillikenFrances J.MartinsLuis L.MorganHal. 1998. Explaining organizational responsiveness to work-family issues: The role of human resource executives as issue interpreters. Academy of Management Journal41(5): 580–92.
46.
MishelLawrenceShierholzHeidi. 2013. A decade of flat wages: The key barrier to shared prosperity and a rising middle class. Briefing Paper No. 365. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
47.
OstermanPaul. 1995. Work/family programs and the employment relationship. Administrative Science Quarterly40: 681–700.
48.
PlantengaJannekeRemeryChantal, and EU Expert Group on Gender and Employment (EGGE). 2010. Flexible working time arrangements and gender equality: A comparative review of 30 European countries. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
49.
PraschRobert E.2000. Revising the labor supply curve: Implications for work time and minimum wage legislation. In GoldenLonnieFigartDeborah M. (Eds.), Working-Time: International Trends, Theory and Policy Perspectives, pp. 159–73. London and New York: Routledge.
50.
RuberyJill. 2010. Institutionalizing the employment relationship. In MorganGlennCampbellJ.CrouchColinPedersenOve K.WhitleyRichard (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Institutional Analysis, pp. 497–526. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51.
SchiefSebastian. 2009. Patterns of flexibility in domestic and foreign enterprises. In DelsenLeiBauerFrankCetteGilbertSmithMark (Eds.), Comparative Analyses of Operating Hours and Working Times in the European Union, pp. 143–64. Heidelberg: Physica.
52.
SengenbergerWerner. 1994. Protection—participation—promotion: The systemic nature and effects of labour standards. In SengenbergerWernerCampbellDuncan (Eds.), Creating Economic Opportunities: The Role of Labour Standards in Industrial Restructuring, pp. 45–60. Geneva: ILO.
53.
Statistics Sweden. 2012. Working hours and work environment, 2010–2011. Living Condition Report126. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden
VisserJelle. 2013. Institutional Characteristics of Trade Unions, Wage Setting, State Intervention and Social Pacts (ICTWSS). An international database. Amsterdam: Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labor Studies (AIAS). Accessed at http://www.uva-aias.net/208 (March2014).
56.
WeinkopfClaudia. 2014. Women’s employment in Germany: Robust in crisis but vulnerable in job quality. Revue de l’OFCE: Débats et politique133: 1–26.
57.
WooNicoleBakerDean. 2012. States could save $1.7 billion per year with federal financing of work sharing. Washington, DC: Center for Economic and Policy Research, pp. 1–3.
58.
WoodStephen J.de MenezesLilian M.LasaosaAna. 2003. Family-friendly management in Great Britain: Testing various perspectives. Industrial Relations42(2): 221–50.