The relationships among employee representation, formal union status, and employer strategies within and across institutional regimes offer a variegated landscape in the context of globalization. Key questions remain as to the relative weight of macro- and micro-level influences on union status at subsidiaries of multinational companies (MNCs). This study analyzes data gathered through coordinated surveys of MNC subsidiaries in Canada, Ireland, and the United Kingdom and tests the extent to which union status and double-breasting depend on home-country variation, host-country influences, and particular organizational characteristics. The authors find support for a combination of effects on both union status and double-breasting. Further analyses test explicit variations on union status within each host context and support arguments that effects depend on the particularities of national industrial relations regimes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlmondPhilFernerAnthony. 2006. American Multinationals in Europe: Managing Employment Relations across Borders. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2.
AlmondPhilEdwardsTonyGunniglePatrickCollingTrevorFernerAnthonyMueller-CamenMichaelQuintanillaJavierWachterHarmut. 2005. Unravelling home and host country effects: An investigation of the HR policies of an American multinational in four European countries. Industrial Relations44(2): 276–306.
3.
BeaumontPhillip B.HarrisRichard I. D., 1992. “Double-breasted” recognition arrangements in Britain. International Journal of Human Resource Management3(2): 267–83.
4.
BélangerJacquesHarveyPierre-AntoineJalettePatriceLévesqueChristianMurrayGregor. 2006. Employment practices in multinational companies in Canada: Building organizational capabilities and institutions for innovation. University of Montreal, HEC Montreal, University of Laval, Montreal and Laval: The Inter-University Research Centre on Globalization and Work (CRIMT).
5.
BenthamKaren J.2002. Employer resistance to union certification: A study of eight Canadian jurisdictions. Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations57(1): 159–87.
6.
BlanchflowerDavid G.BrysonAlex. 2009. Trade union decline and the economics of the workplace. In BrownWilliamBrysonAlexForthJohnWhitfieldKeith (Eds.), The Evolution of the Modern Workplace, pp. 48–73. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
CampolietiMichelleRiddellChrisSlinnSara. 2007. Certification delay under elections and card-check procedures: Empirical evidence from Canada. Industrial and Labor Relations Review61(1): 32–58.
8.
CrouchColinSchröderMartinVoelzkowHelmut. 2009. Regional and sectoral varieties of capitalism. Economy and Society38(4): 65–78.
9.
CullinaneNaillDonagheyJimmyDundonTonyDobbinsTony. 2012. Different rooms, different voices: Double-breasting, multi-channel representation and the managerial agenda. International Journal of Human Resource Management23(2): 368–84.
10.
DickenPeterKellyPhilip F.OldsKrisYeungHenry Wai-Chung. 2001. Chains and networks, territories and scales: Towards a relational framework for analysing the global economy. Global Network1(1): 89–112.
11.
DisneyRichardGoslingAmandaMachinStephen. 1995. British unions in decline: An examination of the 1980s fall in trade union recognition. Industrial and Labor Relations Review48(3): 403–19.
EdwardsTony. 2000. Multinationals, international integration and employment practice in domestic plants. Industrial Relations Journal31(2): 115–29.
14.
EdwardsTonyFernerAnthony. 2002. The renewed “American Challenge”: A review of employment practices in US multinationals. Industrial Relations Journal33(2): 94–111.
15.
FernerAnthony. 1997. Country of origin effects and HRM in multinational companies. Human Resource Management Journal7(1): 19–36.
16.
FernerAnthonyVarulMatthias. 2000. “Vanguard” subsidiaries and the diffusion of new practices: A case study of German multinationals. British Journal of Industrial Relations38(1): 115–40.
17.
FernerAnthonyQuintanillaJavierGarulMatthias Z., 2001. Country-of-origin effects, host-country effects and the management of HR in multinationals: German companies in Britain and Spain. Journal of World Business36(2): 107–27.
18.
FernerAnthonyAlmondPhilCollingTrevorEdwardsTony. 2005. Policies on union representation in US multinationals in the UK: Between micro-politics and macro-institutions. British Journal of Industrial Relations43(4): 703–28.
19.
FreemanRichardKleinerMorris. 1990. Employer behavior in the face of a union organizing drive. Industrial and Labor Relations Review43(4): 351–65.
20.
FreemanRichardPelletierJeffrey. 1990. The impact of industrial relations legislation on British union density. British Journal of Industrial Relations28(2): 141–64.
21.
FreemanRichardRogersJoel. 1999. What Workers Want. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press/Cornell University Press.
22.
FreemanRichardBoxallPeterHaynesPeter. 2007. The Anglo-American economies and employee voice. In FreemanRichardBoxallPeterHaynesPeter (Eds.), What Workers Say, pp. 1–24. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press/Cornell University Press.
23.
GallGregor. 2007. Trade union recognition in Britain. Economic and Industrial Democracy28(1): 78–109.
24.
GallGregor. 2010. The first ten years of the third statutory union recognition procedure in Britain. Industrial Law Journal39(4): 444–48.
25.
GearyJohn F.RocheWilliam K., 2001. Multinationals and human resources practices in Ireland: A rejection of the “new conformance thesis.”International Journal of Human Resources Management12(1): 109–27.
26.
GeppertMikeWilliamsKarenMattenDirk. 2003. The social construction of contextual realities in MNCs: An Anglo-German comparison of subsidiary choice. Journal of Management Studies30(3): 617–41.
27.
GodardJohn. 2003. Do labor laws matter? The density decline and convergence thesis revisited. Industrial Relations42(3): 458–92.
28.
GunniglePatrickMorleyMichaelTurnerTom. 1997. Challenging collectivist traditions, individualism and the management of industrial relations in greenfield sites. Economic and Social Review28(2): 105–34.
GunniglePatrickCollingsDavid G.MorleyMichael. 2005. Exploring the dynamics of industrial relations in US multinationals: Evidence from the Republic of Ireland. Industrial Relations Journal36(3): 241–56.
31.
GunniglePatrickLavelleJonathanMcDonnellAnthony. 2009. Subtle but deadly? Union avoidance through “double breasting” among multinational companies. Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations16: 51–74.
32.
HallPeter A.SoskiceDavid W. (Eds.). 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33.
HanckeBob (Ed.). 2009. Debating Varieties of Capitalism: A Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34.
HardyJane. 2006. Bending workplace institutions in transforming economies: Foreign investment in Poland. Review of International Political Economy13(1): 129–51.
35.
HarzingAnne-WilSorgeArndt. 2003. The relative impact of country of origin and universal contingencies on internationalization strategies and corporate control in multinational enterprises: Worldwide and European perspectives. Organization Studies24(2): 187–214.
36.
HillCharlesHoskissonRobert. 1987. Strategy and structure in the multiproduct firm. Academy of Management Review12(2): 331–41.
37.
LaneChristel. 2008. National capitalisms and global production networks: An analysis of their interaction in two global industries. Socio-Economic Review6(2): 227–60.
38.
LangilleBrian. 1981. The Michelin amendment in context. Dalhousie Law Journal6(3): 523–57.
39.
LavelleJonathanMcDonnellAnthonyGunniglePatrick. 2009. Human Resource Practices in Multinational Companies in Ireland: A Contemporary Analysis. Dublin: The Stationery Office.
40.
LipskyDavid B.FarberHenry S., 1976. The composition of strike activity in the construction industry. Industrial and Labor Relations Review29(3): 401–28.
41.
MarginsonPaulSissonKeith. 2004. European Integration and Industrial Relations: Multi-Level Governance in the Making. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
42.
MarginsonPaulEdwardsPaulEdwardsTonyFernerAnthonyTregaskisOlga. 2010. Employee representation and consultative voice in multinational companies operating in Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations48(1): 151–80.
43.
MeardiGuglielmoMarginsonPaulFichterMichaelFrybesMarcinStanojevicMiroslavTothAndrás. 2009a. Varieties of multinationals: Adapting employment practices in central Eastern Europe. Industrial Relations48(3): 489–511.
44.
MeardiGuglielmoMarginsonPaulFichterMichaelFrybesMarcinStanojevicMiroslavTothAndrás. 2009b. The complexity of relocation and the diversity of trade union responses: Efficiency-oriented foreign direct investment in Central Europe. European Journal of Industrial Relations15(1): 27–47.
45.
MorganGlenn. 2011. Reflections on the macro-politics of micro-politics. In DörrenbächerChristopherGeppertMike (Eds.), Politics and Power in the Multinational Corporation, pp. 415–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46.
MorganGlennKristensenPeer Hull. 2006. The contested space of multinationals: Varieties of institutionalism, varieties of capitalism. Human Relations59(1): 1467–90.
47.
MurrayGregorVergePierre. 1999. La Représentation Syndicale: Visage Juridique Actuel et Futur. Sainte-Foy: Les Presses de l'Université Laval.
PudelkoMarkusHarzingAnne-Wil. 2007. Country-of-origin, localization, or dominance effect? An empirical investigation of HRM practices in foreign subsidiaries. Human Resource Management47(4): 535–59.
50.
RiddellChris. 2004. Union certification success under voting versus card-check procedures: Evidence from British Columbia, 1978–98. Industrial and Labor Relations Review57(4): 493–517.
51.
RoyleTony. 2006. The dominance effect? Multinational corporations in the Italian quick-food service sector. British Journal of Industrial Relations44(4): 757–79.
52.
SakoMariJacksonGregory. 2006. Strategy meets institutions: The transformation of management-labor relations at Deutsche Telekom and NTT. Industrial and Labor Relations Review59(3): 347–66.
53.
SchmidttMatthias. 2003. Deregulation of the German industrial relations system via foreign direct investment: Are the subsidiaries of Anglo-Saxon MNCs a threat for the institutions of industrial democracy in Germany?Economic and Industrial Democracy24(3): 349–77.
54.
SmithChris. 2005. Beyond convergence and divergence: Explaining variations in organizational practices and forms. In AckroydStephenBattRosemaryThompsonPaulTolbertPamela S. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook on Work and Organization, pp. 602–25. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55.
TallmanStephenLiJiatao. 1996. Effects of international diversity and product diversity on the performance of multinational firms. Academy of Management Journal39(1): 176–96.
56.
TüselmannHeinz-JosefMcDonaldFrankHeiseArneAllenMatthewVoronkovaSvitlana. 2007. Employee Relations in Foreign-Owned Subsidiaries: German Multinational Companies in the UK. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
57.
WestneyD. EleanorZaheerSrilata. 2009. The multinational enterprise as an organization. In RugmanAlan M. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of International Business, 2nd ed., pp. 341–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
58.
WhitleyRichard. 1999. Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
