The authors examine whether U.S. multinational companies (MNCs) are distinctive in the degree to which they exert direct control over policy on human resources and employment relations (HR/ER) in their foreign subsidiaries. The results confirm the distinctiveness of U.S. MNCs in their greater degree of direct control of policy, compared not only with non-U.S. firms but with every other major nationality or national grouping of MNCs: France, Germany, the Nordic group, the rest of Europe, and Japan. U.S. control of HR/ER policy is greater not just in the aggregate, but for most individual items. Finally, while levels of control over subsidiaries vary among host countries studied (Canada, Ireland, Spain, and the United Kingdom) the greater U.S. orientation to control relative to non-U.S. MNCs holds regardless of host.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlmondPhilFernerAnthony (Eds.). 2006. American Multinationals in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2.
AlmondPhilMuller-CamenMichaelCollingsDavidQuintanillaJavier. 2006. Pay and performance. In AlmondPhilFernerAnthony (Eds.), American Multinationals in Europe, pp. 119–45. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
AmableBruno. 2000. Institutional complementarity and diversity of social systems of innovation and production. Review of International Political Economy7(4): 645–87.
4.
AmableBruno. 2003. The Diversity of Modern Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
ArthursHarry W.2007. Labour and the “real” constitution. Les Cahiers de Droit48(1–2): 43–64.
6.
BarryFrank. 2006. Foreign direct investment and the economy of Ireland: Some current issues. Unpublished paper. Dublin: University College Dublin. Accessed at http://www.oenb.at/de/img/barry_tcm14-49104.pdf.
7.
BartlettChristopherGhoshalSumantra. 1998. Managing across Borders. 2nd ed.London: Hutchinson.
8.
BélangerJacquesBerggrenChristianBjörkmanTorstenKöhlerChristoph (Eds.). 1999. Being Local Worldwide: ABB and the Challenge of Global Management. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press/Cornell University Press.
9.
BélangerJacquesTrudeauGilles. 2010. The institutional specificity of Quebec in the context of globalization. Canadian Labour and Employment Law Journal15(1): 49–76.
10.
ChandlerAlfred. 1990. Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
11.
ChildJohn. 1984. Organization: A Guide to Problems and Practice. 2nd ed.London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
12.
ChildJohnFaulknerDavidPitkethlyRobert. 2000. Foreign direct investment in the UK 1985–1994: The impact on domestic management practice. Journal of Management Studies37(1): 141–66.
13.
ChungLai HongGibbonsPatrickSchochHerbert. 2006. The management of information and managers in subsidiaries of multinational corporations. British Journal of Management17(2): 153–65.
14.
CollingsDaveGunniglePatrickMorleyMichael. 2008. Between Boston and Berlin: American MNCs and the shifting contours of industrial relations in Ireland. International Journal of Human Resource Management9(2): 240–61.
15.
Consejo Económico y Social. 2010. Memoria sobre la situación socioeconómica y laboral de Espa∼a 2009. Madrid: CES.
16.
CrouchColin. 2005. Capitalist Diversity and Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
DunningJohn. 1998. American Investment in British Manufacturing. Rev. ed.London and New York: Routledge.
18.
FarndaleElainePaauweJaap. 2005. The role of corporate HR functions in multinational corporations: The interplay between corporate, regional/national and plant level. Cornell University, NYSSILR, Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies, Working Paper 05–1.
19.
FarndaleElaineBrewsterChrisPoutsmaErik. 2008. Coordinated vs. liberal market HRM: The impact of institutionalization on multinational firms. International Journal of Human Resource Management19(11): 2004–23.
20.
Fenton-O'CreevyMarkGooderhamPaulNordhaugOdd. 2008. Human resource management in U.S. subsidiaries in Europe and Australia: Centralization or autonomy?Journal of International Business Studies39(1): 151–66.
21.
FernerAnthony. 2000. The underpinnings of “bureaucratic” control systems: HRM in European multinationals. Journal of Management Studies37(4): 521–40.
22.
FernerAnthonyTregaskisOlgaEdwardsPaulEdwardsTonyMarginsonPaul. 2011. HRM structures and subsidiary discretion in multinationals. International Journal of Human Resource Management22(3): 483–509.
23.
FernerAnthonyVarulMatthias Z., 2000. “Vanguard” subsidiaries and the diffusion of new practices: A case study of German multinationals. British Journal of Industrial Relations38(1): 115–40.
24.
GereffiGary. 2005, The global economy: Organization, governance, and development. In SmelserNeil J.SwedbergRichard (Eds.), The Handbook of Economic Sociology, 2nd ed., pp. 160–182. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25.
GodardJohn. 2009. The exceptional decline of the American labor movement. Industrial and Labor Relations Review63(1): 82–108.
26.
GunniglePatrickCollingsDavidMorleyMichael. 2006. Accommodating global capitalism? State policy and industrial relations in American MNCs in Ireland. In FernerAnthonyQuintanillaJavierSánchez-RundeCarlos (Eds.), Multinationals, Institutions and the Construction of Transnational Practices, pp. 86–108. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
27.
HallPeterSoskiceDavid. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
HarzingAnne-Wil. 1999. Managing the Multinationals: An International Study of Control Mechanisms. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
29.
HarzingAnne-WilSorgeArndtPaauweJan. 2002. Headquarters-subsidiary relationships in multinational companies: A British-German comparison. In GeppertMikeMattenDirkWilliamsKaren (Eds.), Challenges for European Management in a Global Context, pp. 96–118. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
30.
HaydenAnnetteEdwardsTony. 2001. The erosion of the country of origin effect: A case study of a Swedish multinational company. Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations56(1): 116–40.
31.
HedlundGunnar. 1981. Autonomy of subsidiaries and formalization of headquarters-subsidiary relationships in Swedish MNCs. In OtterbeckL. (Ed.), The Management of Headquarters-Subsidiary Relationships in Multinational Corporations, pp. 25–78. Aldershot: Gower.
32.
JacobySanford. 1997. Modern Manors: Welfare Capitalism since the New Deal. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33.
JacobySanford. 2005. The Embedded Corporation: Corporate Governance and Employment Relations in Japan and the United States. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
34.
KatzHarryDarbishireOwen. 2000. Converging Divergences: Worldwide Changes in Employment Systems. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press/Cornell University Press.
35.
KristensenPeer HullZeitlinJonathan. 2005. Local Players in Global Games: The Strategic Constitution of a Multinational Corporation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36.
LaneChristel. 1989. Management and Labour in Europe. The Industrial Enterprise in Germany, Britain and France. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
37.
LincolnJames R.HanadaMitsuyoMcBrideKerry. 1986. Organizational structures in Japanese and U.S. manufacturing. Administrative Science Quarterly31(3): 338–64.
38.
MarginsonPaulEdwardsPaulMartinRodPurcellJohnSissonKeith. 1988. Beyond the Workplace: Managing Industrial Relations in the Multi-Establishment Enterprise. Oxford: Blackwell.
39.
MartínezJonJarilloJ. Carlos. 1989. The evolution of research on coordination mechanisms in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies20(3): 489–514.
40.
MauriceMarcSellierFrançoisSilvestreJean-Jacques. 1986. The Social Foundations of Industrial Power: A Comparison of France and Germany. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41.
NegandhiAnant. 1983. External and internal functioning of American, German, and Japanese multinational corporations: Decisionmaking and policy issues. In CassonMark (Ed.), Multinational Corporations, pp. 557–77. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
42.
PudelkoMarkusHarzingAnne-Wil. 2008. The Golden Triangle for MNCs: Standardization towards headquarters practices, standardization towards global best practices and localization. Organizational Dynamics37(4): 394–404.
43.
QuintanillaJavierSusaetaLourdesSánchez-MangasRocío. 2008. The diffusion of employment practices in multinationals: “Americanness” within U.S. MNCs in Spain?Journal of Industrial Relations50(5): 680–96.
44.
RosenzweigPhilipNohriaNitin. 1994. Influences on human resource management practices in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies25(2) 229–51.
45.
SchmidtVivien. 2003. French capitalism transformed, yet still a third variety of capitalism. Economy and Society32(4): 526–54.
46.
SingeIngoCroucherRichard. 2005. U.S. multi-nationals and the German industrial relations system. Management Revue16(1): 123–37.
47.
SmithChrisMeiksinsPeter. 1995. System, society and dominance effects in cross-national organizational analysis. Work, Employment and Society9(2): 241–67.
48.
StevensJames. 2002. Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erblaum.
49.
StreeckWolfgangThelenKathleen. 2005. Introduction: Institutional change in advanced political economies. In StreeckWolfgangThelenKathleen (Eds.), Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, pp. 1–39. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
50.
StrudenmundA. H.CassidyHenry. 1987. Using Econometrics: A Practical Guide. Boston: Little Brown.
51.
SturgeonTimothyVan BiesebroeckJohannesGereffiGary. 2008. Value chains, networks and clusters: Reframing the global automobile industry. Journal of Economic Geography8(3): 297–321.
52.
TabachnikBarbaraFidellLinda, 2007. Using Multivariate Statistics. 5th ed.Boston: Pearson.
53.
TaylorSullyBeechlerShonNapierNancy. 1996. Toward an integrative model of strategic international human resource management. Academy of Management Review21(4): 959–85.
54.
TempelAnneEdwardsTonyFernerAnthonyMuller-CamenMichaelWächterHartmut. 2006. Subsidiary responses to institutional duality: Collective representation in U.S. multinationals in Britain and Germany. Human Relations59(11): 1543–70.
55.
ThoryK.2008. The internationalisation of HRM through reverse transfer: Two case studies of French multinationals in Scotland. Human Resource Management Journal18(1): 54–71.
56.
UNCTAD [United Nations Conference on Trade and Development]. 2010. World Investment Report 2010: Investing in a Low-Carbon Economy. New York and Geneva: UNCTAD.
57.
WächterHartmutPetersRenéFernerAnthonyGunniglePatrickQuintanillaJavier. 2006. The role of the international personnel function. In AlmondPhilFernerAnthony (Eds.), American Multinationals in Europe: Managing Employment Relations across National Borders, pp. 248–70. Oxford: Blackwell.
58.
WhitleyRichard. 1999. Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
59.
YuGyu-ChangParkWoo-SungChoYung-Ho. 2007. MNCs' HRM strategy and country of origin effect: Do North American, European and Japanese firms really differ?Management Revue18(4): 392–409.
