The authors estimate the probability of promotion into VP and CEO positions using employer-employee data from all Danish companies observed during the period 1997 to 2007. After controlling for a large number of firm and family-related variables, including take-up history of maternity and paternity leave and proxies for female-friendly companies, a considerable gap still occurs in the promotion probabilities for CEO positions. Part of the gap is due to gender differences in the area of specialization as top executive. Women tend to cluster in VP positions in HR, R&D, and IT areas in which the chances of a CEO promotion are lower than for positions as CFOs and VPs in Sales or Production areas.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AddaJérômeDustmannChristianStevensKatrien. 2011. The career costs of children. CEPR Discussion Paper no. DP8697.
2.
AlbrechtJames W.EdinPer-AndersSundstrømMarianneVromanSusan B., 1999. Career interruptions and subsequent earnings: A reexamination using Swedish data. Journal of Human Resources34(1): 294–311.
3.
AlbrechtJamesBjorklundAndersVromanSusan. 2003. Is there a glass-ceiling in Sweden?Journal of Labor Economics21(1): 145–77.
4.
AtheySusanAveryChristopherZemskyPeter. 2000. Mentoring and diversity. American Economic Review90(4): 765–86.
5.
BellLinda. 2005. Women-led firms and the gender wage gap in top executive jobs. IZA Discussion Paper no. 1689.
6.
BertrandMarianneHallockKevin F., 2001. The gender gap in top corporate jobs. Industrial and Labor Relations Review55(1): 3–21.
7.
BertrandMarianneGoldinClaudiaKatzLawrence F., 2010. Dynamics of the gender gap for young professionals in the corporate and financial sectors. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics2(3): 228–55.
8.
BjerkDavid. 2008. Glass ceiling or sticky floors? Statistical discrimination in a dynamic model of hiring and promotion. Economic Journal118(530): 961–82.
9.
BlauFrancine D.DeVaroJed. 2006. New evidence on gender differences in promotion rates: An empirical analysis of a sample of new hires. NBER Working Paper no. 12321.
10.
BoothAlison L.FrancesconiMarcoFrankJeff. 2003. A sticky floors model of promotion, pay, and gender. European Economic Review47(2): 295–322.
11.
BoothAlison L.NolenPatrick. 2009. Gender differences in risk behaviour: Does nurture matter? CEPR Discussion Paper no. 7198.
12.
Cobb-ClarkDeborah. 2001. Getting ahead: The determinants of and payoffs to internal promotion for young US men and women. Centre for Economic Policy Research, Australian National University, Discussion Paper no. 430.
13.
FietzeSimonHolstElkeTobschVerena. 2009. Personality and career: She's got what it takes. DIW Discussion Paper, no. 955, Berlin.
14.
FrederiksenAndersKatoTakao. 2011. Human capital and career success: Evidence from linked employer-employee data. IZA Discussion Paper no. 5764.
15.
FryerRoland G.2007. Belief flipping in a dynamic model of statistical discrimination. Journal of Public Economics91(5–6): 1151–66.
16.
GuptaNabanita DattaOaxacaRonald L.SmithNina. 2006. Swimming upstream, floating downstream: Comparing women's relative wage progress in the United States and Denmark. Industrial and Labor Relations59(2): 243–66.
17.
GuptaNabanita DattaSmithNinaVernerMette. 2008. The impact of Nordic countries' family-friendly policies on employment, wages, and children. Review of Economics of the Household6(1): 65–89.
18.
JaumotteFlorence. 2003. Labour force participation of women: Empirical evidence on the role of policy and other determinants in the OECD countries. OECD Economic Studies37(2): 51–108.
19.
LazearEdward P.RosenSherwin. 1990. Male-female wage differentials in job ladders. Journal of Labor Economics8(1): S106–S123.
20.
MatsaDavid A.MillerAmalia R., 2011. Chipping away at the glass ceiling: Gender spillovers in corporate leadership. American Economic Review101(3): 635–39.
21.
McCueKristin. 1996. Promotions and wage growth. Journal of Labor Economics14(2): 175–209.
22.
MillerAmalia R.2011. The effects of motherhood timing on career path. Journal of Population Economics24(3): 1071–1100.
23.
NeergaardHelleHersbyMetteMadsenHenningUlhøiJohn ParmMadsenMona T., 2008. Revisiting the think manager-think male syndrome in an egalitarian culture. Proceedings of the Academy of Management Conference, Anaheim, California, USA.
24.
NiederleMurielVesterlundLisa. 2007. Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much?Quarterly Journal of Economics122(3): 1067–1101.
25.
[OECD] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2001. Employment Outlook. Paris, OECD.
26.
OECD. 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005. Babies and Bosses, Reconciling Work and Family Life. Paris, OECD.
27.
PhelpsEdmund S.1972. The statistical theory of racism and sexism. American Economic Review62(4): 659–61.
28.
PolachekSolomon W.1981. Occupational self-selection: A human capital approach to sex differences in occupational structure. Review of Economics and Statistics63(1): 60–69.
29.
ScheinVirginia E.1973. The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology57(2): 95–100.
30.
SmithNinaSmithValdemarVernerMette. 2011. Why are so few females promoted into CEO and Vice-President positions? Danish empirical evidence 1997–2007. IZA-DP 5961, Bonn, IZA.
31.
WooldridgeJeffrey M.2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32.
World Economic Forum. 2011. The Global Gender Gap Report. Geneva, World Economic Forum.
