Using a large, matched employer-employee data set, the authors investigate the impact of company and industry collective bargaining agreements on wages in the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland (CE3). They also examine the changing characteristics of the union wage premium in different cohorts of establishments. Their results challenge the common idea of weak unions in the CE3 by revealing a union wage premium whose characteristics depend on the level at which collective bargaining occurs. They find that industry agreements increase wages for low-skilled workers, while company agreements increase medium- and high-skilled wages. Their second finding is that the union wage premium is unevenly distributed between cohorts, with substantial cross-country variation. Wage premiums are concentrated in the transitional cohorts in the Czech Republic and Poland and, to a lesser extent, in the pre-transitional cohort in Hungary.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AguileraRuth V.DabuAdina. 2005. Transformation of employment relations systems in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Industrial Relations47(1): 16–42.
2.
AltomonteCarloGuaglianoClaudia. 2001. Competing locations? Market potential and FDI in Central and Eastern Europe vs. the Mediterranean. LICOS Discussion Paper, 108/ 2001, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
3.
AroPekka O.BeranV.BirckM.DimitrovaD.FieldingR.RepoP.SzapoE., 1997. Collective bargaining in Central European subsidiaries of multinationals. Report on Trade Union Experiences in Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia. International Labor Organization, Bureau for Workers' Activities; December.
4.
BaronJames N.HannanMichael T.BurtonM. Diane. 2001. Labor pains: Change in organizational models and employee turnover in young, high-tech firms. American Journal of Sociology106(4): 960–1012.
5.
BasuSwatiEstrinSaulSvejnarJan. 2004. Wage determination under Communism and in transition: Evidence from Central Europe. IZA Discussion Paper No. 1276.
6.
BasuSwatiEstrinSaulSvejnarJan. 2005. Employment determination in enterprises under Communism and in transition: Evidence from Central Europe. Industrial and Labor Relations Review58(3): 353–69.
7.
BennettJohnEstrinSaulMawJames W.UrgaGiovanni. 2004. Privatisation methods and economic growth in transition economies. Nota di Lavoro No. 105.2004.
8.
BlanchflowerDavidBrysonAlex. 2004. What effect do unions have on wages now and would Freeman and Medoff be surprised?Journal of Labour Research25(3): 383–414.
9.
BlanchflowerDavidFreemanRichard B., 1997. The attitudinal legacy of Communist labor relations. Industrial and Labor Relations Review50(3): 438–59.
10.
BoeriTitoTerrellKatherine. 2002. Institutional determinants of labor reallocation in transition. Journal of Economic Perspectives16(2): 51–76.
11.
BradaJosef C.KingArthur E.MaChia Y., 1997. Industrial economics of the transition: Determinants of enterprise efficiency in Czechoslovakia and Hungary. Oxford Economic Papers, New Series, 49(1): 104–27.
12.
BrysonAlex. 2007. The effect of trade unions on wages. Reflets et perspectives de la vie économique46(2–3): 33–45.
13.
BukowskiMaciej (Ed.). 2007. Employment in Poland, 2006. Ministry of Labour and Social Policy, Warsaw.
14.
BukowskiMaciej (Ed.). 2010. Employment in Poland, 2008. Ministry of Labour and Social Policy, Warsaw.
15.
CardDavidde la RicaSara. 2006. Firm-level contracting and the structure of wages in Spain. Industrial and Labor Relations Review59(4): 573–92.
16.
Dell'AringaCarloLuciforaClaudio. 1994. Wage dispersion and unionism: Do unions protect low pay?International Journal of Manpower15(2/3): 150–69.
17.
Dell'AringaCarloPaganiLaura. 2007. Collective bargaining and wage dispersion in Europe. British Journal of Industrial Relations45(1): 29–54.
18.
DisneyRichardGoslingAmandaMachinStephen. 1995. British unions in decline: Determinants of the 1980s fall in union recognition. Industrial and Labor Relations Review48(3): 403–19.
19.
DisneyRichardGoslingAmandaMachinStephen. 1996. What has happened to union recognition in Britain?Economica63(249): 1–18.
20.
EIRO. 2002a. Industrial Relations in the candidate countries. EIROnline, European Industrial Relations Observatory online Document ID: TN0207102F.
21.
EIRO. 2002b. Poland: Declining trade union density examined; The development of the national Tripartite Commission. EIROnline, European Industrial Relations Observatory online. Document IDs: PL0208105F; PL0210106F.
EIRO. 2009c. Poland: Trade unions threaten to abandon tripartite dialogue; Wage flexibility and collective bargaining; Multinational companies and collective bargaining. EIROnline, European Industrial Relations Observatory online. Document IDs: PL0907019I; PL0803019Q PL0904049Q.
26.
EstrinSaulHanousekJ. JanKočendaEvzenSvejnarJan. 2009. The effects of privatization and ownership in transition economies. Journal of Economic Literature47(3): 699–728.
27.
Eurostat. 2003. Structure of Earnings Survey (SES) for the year 2002—Eurostat's arrangements for implementing the Council Regulation 530/1999 and the Commission Regulation, 1916/2000. Luxembourg: Eurostat.
28.
FischerStanleySahayRatna. 2000. The transition economies after ten years. NBER Working paper no. 7664. Cambridge, MA:National Bureau of Economic Research, April.
29.
FlanaganRobert J.1998. Institutional reformation in Eastern Europe. Industrial Relations37(3): 337–57.
30.
FreemanRichard. 1992. What direction for labor market institutions in Eastern and Central Europe? NBER Working paper no. 4209. Cambridge, MA:National Bureau of Economic Research.
31.
FreemanRichard B.MedoffJames L., 1984. What Do Unions Do?New York: Basic Books.
32.
FregeCarolaKellyJohn. 2003. Union revitalization strategies in comparative perspective. European Journal of Industrial Relations9(1): 7–24.
33.
GardawskiJuliusz (Ed.). 2009. Polacy pracujący a kryzys fordyzmu. Warszawa: Scholar.
34.
GardawskiJuliuszGaciarzBarbaraMokrzyszewskiAndrzejPankówWlodzimierz1999. Collapse of the Rampart? Trade Unions in Privatised Economy. Warsaw: IPA and Ebert Foundation.
35.
GrabbeHeather. 1999. A partnership for accession?The implications of EU conditionality for the Central and East European applicants. Robert Schuman Centre Working Paper 12/99.
36.
GrootingsPeterGustavsenBjörnHéthyLajos. 1991. New Forms of Work Organization in Europe. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
37.
HanckéRobertKurekovaLucia. 2008. Varieties of capitalism and economic governance in Central Europe. NewGov/STACEE Report, September.
38.
HannanMichaelBurtonM. DianeBaronJames N., 1996. Inertia and change in the early years: Employment relations in young, high technology firms. Industrial and Corporate Change5(2): 503–36.
39.
HéthyLajosMakóCsaba. 1989. Patterns of Workers' Behavior and the Business Enterprise. Budapest: Hungarian Academy of Science.
40.
HoeckmanBernardDjankovSimeon. 1996. Intra-industry trade, foreign direct investment and the reorientation of Eastern European exports. Policy Research Working Paper No. 1652. World Bank, September.
41.
HughesGordonHarePaul. 1994. The international competitiveness of industries in Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, Hungary and Poland. Oxford Economic Papers, New Series, 46(2): 200–221.
42.
KöllóJanosKoltayJenő (Eds.). 2002. In Focus: Wages: A Decade of Transformation. The Hungarian Labour Market: Review and Analysis. Budapest: Institute of Economics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
43.
KöllóJanosVinczeMaria. 1999. Self-employment, unemployment and wages: Regional evidence from Hungary and Romania. [BWP] Budapest Working Papers on the Labour Market, June. Labour Research Department, Institute of Economics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Department of Human Resources, Budapest University of Economics. 33 p.
44.
KöllóJanosGyörgySziráckiRévészGábor. 1984. Wage bargaining in Hungarian firms. Vol. 2. Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Economics, Studies No. 24, Budapest.
45.
LansburyMelaniePainNigelSmidkovaKaterina. 1996. Foreign direct investment in Central Europe since 1990: An econometric study. National Institute Economic Review (May): 104–14.
46.
LizalLubomirSingerMiroslavSvejnarJan. 2001. Enterprise breakups and performance during the transition from plan to market. Review of Economics and Statistics83(1): 92–99.
47.
MarginsonPaulMeardiGuglielmo. 2006. EU enlargement and the FDI channel of industrial relations transfer. Industrial Relations Journal37: 92–110.
48.
MartinRoderik. 1997. Industrial relations in Central and Eastern Europe in the late 1990s. Industrial Relations Journal, European Annual Review, pp. 173–90.
49.
MeardiGuglielmo. 2002. The Trojan Horse for the Americanization of Europe? Polish industrial relations towards the EU. European Journal of Industrial Relations8(1): 77–99.
50.
MeardiGuglielmo. 2007a. More voice after more exit? Unstable industrial relations in central eastern Europe. Industrial Relations Journal38: 503–23.
51.
MeardiGuglielmo. 2007b. Multinationals in the new member states and the revitalisation of trade unions. Debatte: Journal of Contemporary Central and Easter Europe15(2): 177–93.
52.
MeardiGuglielmoMarginsonPaulFichterMichaelFrybesMarcinStanojevicMiroslavTothAndras. 2009. Varieties of multinationals: Adapting employment practices in Central Eastern Europe. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society48: 489–511.
53.
NeuhausMarco. 2006. The Impact of FDI on Economic Growth: An Analysis for the Transition Countries of Central and Eastern Europe. New York: Physica-Verlag. A Springer Company.
54.
NeumannLaszlo. 1997. Circumventing trade unions in Hungary: Old and new channels of wage bargaining. European Journal of Industrial Relations3(2): 183–202.
55.
OECD [Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development]. 1993. OFDI in selected Central and Eastern European countries and new independent states. OECD Working Paper No 11.
56.
OECD [Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development]. 2001. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook. Paris: OECD. Ost, David, and Marc Weinstein. 1999. Unionists against unions: Toward hierarchical management in post-communist Poland. East European Politics and Societies 13: 1–33.
57.
Państwowa Inspekcja Pracy. 1999. Sprawozdanie Głównego Inspektora Pracy z działalności Państwowej Inspekcji Pracy [Report by Chief Labour Inspector on the activities of State Labour Inspection]. Warszawa: Polish Labour Inspectorate.
58.
Państwowa Inspekcja Pracy. 2000. Sprawozdanie Głównego Inspektora Pracy z dzialalnoćci Państwowej Inspekcji Pracy [Report by Chief Labour Inspector on the activities of State Labour Inspection]. Warszawa: Polish Labour Inspectorate.
59.
PollertAnna. 1995. Women's employment and service sector transformation in Central Eastern Europe: Case studies in retail in the Czech Republic. Work Employment & Society9(4): 629–55.
60.
PollertAnna. 1997. The transformation of trade unionism in the capitalist and democratic restructuring of the Czech Republic. European Journal of Industrial Relations3(2): 203–28.
61.
PollertAnna. 1999. Trade unionism in transition in Central and Eastern Europe. European Journal of Industrial Relations5(2): 209–34.
62.
PollertAnna. 2000. Ten years of post-Communist Central Eastern Europe: Labour's tenuous foothold in the regulation of the employment relationship. Economic and Industrial Democracy21(2): 183–210.
63.
PollertAnna. 2005. Gender, transformation and employment in Central Eastern Europe. European Journal of Industrial Relations11(July 1): 213–30.
64.
RainnieAlHardyJane. 1995. Desperately seeking capitalism: Solidarity and Polish industrial relations in the 1990s. Industrial Relations Journal26(4): 267–80.
65.
RévészGáborFazekasKarolyKalászIstvanKöllóJanos. 1984. Wage bargaining in Hungarian firms, Vol. 1. Budapest: Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Economics, Studies No. 23.
66.
RiboudMichelleSánchez-PáramoandCarolinaSilva-JáureguiCarlos. 2002. Does Eurosclerosis matter? Institutional reform and labor market performance in Central and Eastern European countries in the 1990s. World Bank, Social Protection Unit, Human Development Network, Social Protection Discussion Paper Series 0202.
67.
SabirianovaKlaraSvejnarJanTerrellKatherine. 2005. Distance to the efficiency frontier and foreign direct investment spillovers. Journal of the European Economic Association3(2–3): 576–86.
68.
ScharleAgota. 2007. The effect of welfare provisions on female labour supply in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice9(2): 157–74.
69.
SharmaSoumitra. 1997. Restructuring Eastern Europe: The Microeconomics of the Transition Process. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
70.
StinchcombeArthur L.1965. Social structure and organizations. In MarchJames G. (Ed.), Handbook of Organizations, pp. 142–93. New York: Rand McNally.
71.
SvejnarJan. 2002. Transition economies: Performance and challenges. Journal of Economic Perspectives16(1): 3–28.
72.
ThirkellJohnScaseRichardVickersaffSarah. 1994. Labour relations in transition in Eastern Europe. Industrial Relations Journal25(2): 84–96.
73.
TothAndras. 1997. The invention of works councils in Hungary. European Journal of Industrial Relations3(2): 161–81.
74.
WeidenfeldWernerAltmannFranz-Lothar. 1995. Central and Eastern Europe on the Way into the European Union: Problems and Prospects of Integration. Washington, DC: Bertelsmann Foundation Publishers.
75.
ZwassAdam. 1984. The Economies of Eastern Europe in a Time of Change. New York: ME Sharpe.
