The authors estimate the effects of U.S. manufacturers' use of staffing services on measured employment and labor productivity between 1989 and 2009. Using time series data constructed from the Occupational Employment Statistics program, they document the dramatic increase in manufacturers' use of staffing services to fill core production occupations and to adjust employment levels during recessions. In 2006, just before the recent recession, staffing services added an estimated 9.2% to manufacturing employment, compared with only 2.3% in 1989. Outsourcing to staffing services significantly dampened measured employment volatility and inflated the growth and volatility of measured labor productivity in manufacturing.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbowdJohn M.HaltiwangerJohnLaneJuliaMcKinneyKevin L.SanduskyKristin. 2007. Technology and the demand for skill: An analysis of within and between firm differences. NBER Working paper no. 13043. Cambridge, MA:National Bureau of Economic Research.
2.
AbrahamKatharine G.1990. Restructuring the employment relationship: The growth of market-mediated work arrangements. In AbrahamKatharine G.McKersieR. B. (Eds.). New Developments in the Labor Market: Toward a New Institutional Paradigm, pp. 85–119. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
3.
AutorDavid H.2001. Why do temporary help firms provide free general skills training?Quarterly Journal of Economics116(4): 1409–48.
4.
AutorDavid H.2003. Outsourcing at will: The contribution of unjust dismissal doctrine to the growth of employment outsourcing. Journal of Labor Economics21(3): 1–42.
5.
[BLS] United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. 1988. Industry Wage Survey: Temporary Help Supply. September 1987. Bulletin 2313. Washington, DC: BLS.
6.
[BLS] United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2004. The effect of outsourcing and offshoring on BLS productivity measures. March 26. Accessed at http://www.bls.gov/lpc/lproffshoring.pdf.
DavisSteven J.KahnJames. 2008. Interpreting the great moderation: Changes in the volatility of economic activity at the macro and micro levels. Staff Report no. 334 (July). Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
9.
DeyMatthewHousemanSusanPolivkaAnne. 2010. What do we know about contracting out in the United States? In AbrahamKatharine G.SpletzerJames R.HarperMichael J. (Eds.). Labor in the New Economy: Studies in Income and Wealth, Vol. 71, pp. 267–304. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
EldridgeLucy P.SherwoodMark K., 2001. A perspective on the U.S.-Canada manufacturing productivity gap. Monthly Labor Review124(2): 31–88.
11.
EstavãoMarcelloLachSaul. 1999a. Measuring temporary labor outsourcing in U.S. manufacturing. NBER Working paper no. 7421. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
12.
EstavãoMarcelloLachSaul. 1999b. The evolution of the demand for temporary help labor supply in the United States. NBER Working paper no. 7427. Cambridge, MA:National Bureau of Economic Research.
13.
GordonRobert J.2000. Does the “New Economy” measure up to great inventions of the past?Journal of Economic Perspectives14(4): 49–74.
14.
HousemanSusan N.2001. Why employers use flexible staffing arrangements: Evidence from an establishment survey. Industrial and Labor Relations Review55(1): 149–70.
15.
HousemanSusan N.2007. Outsourcing, offshoring, and productivity measurement in United States manufacturing. International Labour Review146(1–2): 61–80.
16.
HousemanSusan N.KallebergArne J.ErickcekGeorge A., 2003. The role of temporary help employment in tight labor markets. Industrial and Labor Relations Review57(1): 105–27.
17.
HousemanSusanKurzChristopherLengermannPaulMandelBejamin. 2011. Offshoring bias in U.S. manufacturing. Journal of Economic Perspectives25(2): 111–32.
18.
KallebergArne L.ReynoldsJeremyMarsdenPeter V., 2003. Externalizing employment: Flexible staffing arrangements in U.S. organizations. Social Science Research32(4): 525–52.
19.
KatzBruce. 1999. What a PEO can do for you. Journal of Accountancy188(1): 57–61.
20.
KlaasBrian S.GaineyThomas W.McClendonJohn A.YangHyuckseung. 2005. Professional employer organizations and their impact on client satisfaction with human resource outcomes: A field study of human resource outsourcing in small and medium enterprises. Journal of Management31(2): 234–54.
OlinerStephen D.SichelDaniel G., 2000. The resurgence of growth in the late 1990s: Is information technology the answer?Journal of Economic Perspectives14(4): 3–22.
23.
OnoYukakoSullivanDaniel. 2010. Manufacturing plants' use of temporary workers: An analysis using census micro data. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, unpublished paper.
24.
PolivkaAnne E.1996. Contingent and alternative work arrangements, defined. Monthly Labor Review119(10): 3–9.
25.
SegalLewis M.SullivanDaniel G., 1997. The growth of temporary services work. Journal of Economic Perspectives11(2): 117–36.
StirohKevin. 2002. Information technology and the U.S. productivity revival: What do the industry data say?American Economic Review92(5): 1559–76.
28.
StockJames H.WatsonMark W., 2003. Has the business cycle changed and why. In GertlerMarkRogoffKenneth (Eds.). NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2002, Vol. 17. Cambridge, MA:National Bureau of Economic Research.
WarnockVeronica CacdacWarnockFrancis E., 2000. The declining volatility of U.S. employment: Was Arthur Burns right? International Finance Discussion Paper no. 677, August. Washington, DC:Federal Reserve Board.
