This study investigates the relationship between manufacturing firms' innovation activity (measured by product innovation, process innovation, and R&D activities) and their numerical flexibility (proxied by the rate of fixed-term contracts). Estimates using data from Spain's Survey on Firms' Strategies (EESE) for the years 2000–2002 reveal a non-monotonic relationship: a firm's probability of innovating and carrying out R&D increased as the rate of use of temporary and other non-core workers increased, but only up to a threshold, beyond which this probability decreased.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ÀcsZoltán J.AudrestchDavid B., 1987. “Innovation, Market Structure, and Firm Size.”Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 69, No. 4, pp. 567–90.
2.
ÀcsZoltán J.AudrestchDavid B., 1988. “Innovation in Small and Large Firms: An Empirical Analysis.”American Economic Review, Vol. 78, No. 4, pp. 678–90.
3.
ÀcsZoltán J.AudrestchDavid B., 1990. Innovation and Small Firms. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
4.
ÀcsZoltán J.AudrestchDavid B., 1991. Innovation and Technological Change: An International Comparison. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
5.
AltuzarraAmaiaPuertaC.SerranoFelipe. 2007. “Evaluating the Innovative Relative Position in the European Union Countries: An Empirical Analysis.”International Review of Applied Economics, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 175–88.
6.
ApplebaumEileenBergPeter. 1997. “Work Reorganization and Flexibility in Job Design.” In LewinDavidMitchellDaniel J.B.ZaidiMahmood A., eds., The Human Resource Management Handbook, Part 2, pp. 45–62. Stamford, Conn.: JAI Press.
7.
ArvanitisSpyros. 2003. “Numerical and Functional Labour Flexibility at Firm Level: Are There Any Implications for Performance and Innovation? Evidence for the Swiss Economy.” Arbeitspapiere/Working Papers No. 80, Swiss Institute for Business Cycle Research.
8.
ArvanitisSpyros. 2005. “Modes of Labour Flexibility at Firm Level: Are There Any Implications for Performance and Innovation? Evidence for the Swiss Economy.”Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 14, No. 6, pp. 993–1016.
9.
AtkinsonJ. G.1984. “Manpower Strategies for Flexible Organizations.”Personnel Management, Vol. 16, No. 8, pp. 28–31.
10.
RubioOscar BajoPueyoCarmen LópezChavarríaPablo Lozano. 1995. “El Papel de la Inversión Extranjera Directa en los Procesos de Innovación Tecnológica: Un Análisis del Caso Español, 1986–92.”Economía Industrial, No. 306, pp. 77–94.
11.
BallLaurenceCecchettiStephen. 1988. “Imperfect Information and Staggered Price Setting.”American Economic Review, Vol. 78, No. 5, pp. 999–1018.
12.
BassaniniAndreaErnstEkkehard. 2002. “Labour Market Regulation, Industrial Relations, and Technological Regimes: A Tale of Comparative Advantage.”Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 391–426.
13.
BoundJohnCumminsClintGrilichesZviHallBronwynJaffeAdam. 1984. “Who Does R&D and Who Patents?” In GrilichesZvi, ed., R&D, Patents, and Productivity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press for the National Bureau of Economic Research.
14.
BoyerRobert. 1988. “Technical Change and the Theory of ‘Regulation.’” In DosiGiovanni, eds., Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter.
15.
CalmforsLarsDriffillJohn. 1988. “Centralization of Wage Bargaining.”Economic Policy, No. 6, pp. 13–61.
16.
CohenWesleyLevinthalDaniel. 1989. “Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D. Implications for the Analysis of R&D Investment.”Economic Journal, No. 99, No. 397, pp. 569–96.
17.
DoladoJuan J.García-SerranoCarlosJimenoJuan F., 2002. “Drawing Lessons from the Boom of Temporary Jobs in Spain.”Economic Journal, Vol. 112, No. 721, pp. F270–F295.
18.
EntorfHorstPohlmeierWinfried. 1990. “Employment, Innovation, and Export Activity: Evidence from Firm-Level Data.” In FlorensJean-PierreIvaldiMarcLaffontJean-JacquesLaisneyF., eds., Microeconomics: Surveys and Applications. London: Blackwell.
19.
European Commission. 2000. “Statistics on Innovation in Europe: Data 1996–1997.”
20.
European Commission. 2001. “Statistics on Innovation in Europe: Data 1996–1997 (CIS II).”Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
21.
European Commission. 2007a. “Employment in Europe 2007.”Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
22.
European Commission. 2007b. “Towards Common Principles of Flexicurity: More and Better Jobs through Flexibility and Security.”Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities, Unit D.2. COM(2007) 359.
23.
FerreiroJesús. 2004. “Decentralized versus Centralized Collective Bargaining: Is the Collective Bargaining Structure in Spain Efficient?”Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 695–728.
24.
FerreiroJesúsGómezM. C., 2006. “Permanent and Temporary Workers: The Insider-Outsider Model Applied to the Spanish Labour Market.”Économie Appliquée, Vol. 59, No. 1, pp. 121–52.
25.
FerreiroJesúsSerranoFelipe. 2001. “The Spanish Labour Market: Reforms and Consequences.”International Review of Applied Economics, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 31–53.
26.
CerdeiraXulia Gonzalez. 1996. “La Empresa Industrial en la Década de los Noventa: Actividades Tecnológicas.”Fundación Empresa Pública, Working Paper No. 9609.
GumbauMercedes. 1997. “Análisis Microeconómico de los Determinantes de la Innovación: Aplicación a las Empresas Industriales Españolas.”Revista Española de Economía, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 41–66.
29.
HatzichronoglouThomas. 1997. “Revision of the High-Technology Sector and Product Classification.”Paris: OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry, No. 1997/2.
30.
HaucapJustusWeyChristian. 2004. “Unionization Structures and Innovation Incentives.”Economic Journal, Vol. 114, No. 494, pp. C149–C165.
31.
HirchSeevBijaouiIlan. 1985. “R&D Intensity and Export Performance: A Micro View.”Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Vol. 121, No. 2, pp. 138–251.
32.
HolmstromBengtMilgromPaul. 1994. “The Firm as an Incentive System.”American Economic Review, Vol. 84, No. 4, pp. 972–91.
33.
HuergoElenaJaumandreuJordi. 2004. “How Does the Probability of Innovation Change with Firm Age?”Small Business Economics, No. 22, No. 3-4, pp. 193–207.
34.
HuertaEmilioLabeagaJosé M., 1991. “Análisis De la Decisión de Exportar: Una Aproximación con Datos Microeconómicos.”Investigaciones Económicas, Suplemento, pp. 41–47.
35.
HunterLaurieMcGregorAlanMaclnnesJohnSproullAlan. 1993. “The ‘Flexible Firm’: Strategy and Segmentation.”British Journal of Industrial Relations, No. 31, No. 2, pp. 383–407.
36.
IchniowskiCaseyShawKathrynPrennushiGiovanna. 1997. “The Effects of Human Resource Management Practices on Productivity: A Study of Steel Finishing Lines.”American Economic Review, Vol. 87, No. 3 (June), pp. 291–313.
37.
JavorcikBeata Smarzynska. 2004. “Does Foreign Direct Investment Increase the Productivity of Domestic Firms? In Search of Spillovers through Backward Linkages.”American Economic Review, Vol. 94, No. 3, pp. 605–27.
38.
KallebergArne. 2001. “Organizing Flexibility: The Flexible Firm in a New Century.”British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 479–504.
39.
KamienMorton I.SchwartzNancy L., 1989. Estructura de Mercado e Innovación. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
40.
LabeagaJose M.RosEster Martínez. 1991. “Estimación de un Modelo de Ecuaciones Simultáneas con Variables Dependientes Limitadas: Una Aplicación con Datos de Panel de la Industria Española.”Investigaciones Económicas, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 465–89.
41.
LefebvreElisabethLefebvreLouis A.BourgaultMario. 1998. “R&D-Related Capabilities as Determinants of Export Performance.”Small Business Economics, No. 10, No. 4, pp. 365–77.
42.
LevinRichard C.CohenWesley M.MoweryDavid C., 1985. “R&D Appropriability, Opportunity, and Market Structure: New Evidence on Schumpeterian Hypotheses.”American Economic Review Proceedings, Vol. 75, No. 2, pp. 20–24.
43.
LevinRichard C.KlevorickAlvin K.NelsonRichard R.WinterSidney G., 1987. “Appropriating the Returns from Industrial R&D.”Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 783–820.
44.
LindbeckAssarSnowerDennis J., 1988. The Insider–Outsider Theory of Employment and Unemployment. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
45.
LinkAlbert N.1980. “Firm Size and Efficient Entrepreneurial Activity: A Reformation of the Schumpeter Hypothesis.”Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 88, No. 4, pp. 771–82.
46.
LorenzEdward. 2005. “Organizational Innovation, Human Resource Management, and Labour Market Structure: A Comparison of the EU-15.”Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 47, No. 4, pp. 424–42.
47.
LorenzEdwardValeyreAntoine. 2004. “Organizational Change in Europe: National Models of the Diffusion of a New ‘One Best Way’?” DRUID Working Paper No. 04-04.
48.
LunnJohnMartinStephen. 1986. “Market Structure, Firm Structure, and Research and Development.”Quarterly Review of Economics and Business, No. 26, No. 1, pp. 31–44.
49.
MalcomsonJames M.1997. “Contracts, Hold-Up, and Labour Markets.”Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 1916–57.
50.
MatusikSharon F.HillCharles W. L., 1998. “The Utilization of Contingent Work, Knowledge Creation, and Competitive Advantage.”Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 680–97.
51.
MichieJonathanSheehanMaura. 2003. “Labour Market Deregulation, ‘Flexibility,’ and Innovation.”Cambridge Journal of Economics, No. 27, No. 1, pp. 123–43.
52.
MichieJonathanSheehanMaura. 1999. “HRM Practices, R&D Expenditure, and Innovative Investment: Evidence from the UK's 1960 Workplace Industrial Relations Survey (WIRS).”Industrialand Corporate Change, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 211–34.
53.
NickellStephen. 1997. “Unemployment and Labour Market Rigidity: Europe versus North America.”Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 55–74.
54.
NickellStephen. 1998. “Unemployment: Questions and Some Answers.”Economic Journal, Vol. 108, No. 448, pp. 802–16.
55.
OECD. 2005. “Oslo Manual: The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities. Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data.”Paris: OECD.
56.
OstermanPaul. 1994. “How Common Is Workplace Transformation and Who Adopts It?”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 173–88.
57.
PhelpsEdmund S.1994. Structural Slumps: The Model Equilibrium Theory of Unemployment, Interest, and Assets. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
58.
RodriguezDiego. 1999. “Relación entre Innovación y Exportaciones de las Empresas: Un Estudio Empírico.”Papeles de Economía Española, No. 81, pp. 167–80.
59.
RothwellRoyDodgsonMark. 1994. “Innovation and Size of Firm.” In DodgsonMarkRothwellRoy, eds., The Handbook of Industrial Innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
60.
Saint-PaulGilles. 2000. The Political Economy of Labour Market Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
61.
SapirAndré. 2003. An Agenda for a Growing Europe: Making the EU Economic System Deliver. European Commission.
62.
CortésLuís Toharia. 2006. “El Problema de la Temporalidad en España: Un Diagnóstico.”Revista del Ministerio de Trabajo y Asuntos Sociales, No. 61 (June).
63.
WakelinKatharine. 1998. “Innovation and Export Behaviour at the Firm Level.”Research Policy, Vol. 26, No. 7, pp. 829–41.
