Previous research on the association between unionization and the adoption of high performance work systems (HPWSs) has yielded inconsistent results. Using data from a 2004 multi-industry survey of firms operating in the Republic of Ireland, the authors examine the relationship between employee union membership rates and relative use of HPWSs. They also test arguments that employment security may affect the receptiveness of unions to such HR practices. The results indicate that as union representation increased, there was a significant decrease in the use of high performance work systems. Evidence also suggests that providing employment security significantly ameliorated this negative impact.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonErin. 1985. “The Salesperson as outside Agent or Employee: A Transaction Cost Analysis.”Marketing Science, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 234–54.
2.
AppelbaumEileenBaileyThomasBergPeterKallebergAnne. 2000. Manufacturing Advantage: Why High-Performance Work Systems Pay OffIthaca, N.Y., and London: ILR Press (an imprint of Cornell University Press).
3.
ArmstrongScott J.OvertonTerry S., 1977. “Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys.”Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 14, pp. 396–402.
4.
ArthurJeffrey B.1994. “Effects of Human Resource Systems on Manufacturing Performance and Turnover.”Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 670–88.
5.
BaccaroLucioSimoniMarco. 2007. “Centralized Wage Bargaining and the ‘Celtic Tiger’ Phenomenon.”Industrial Relations, Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 426–55.
6.
BaconNicolasBlytonPaul. 2006. “Union Cooperation in a Context of Job Insecurity: Negotiated Outcomes from Team Working.”British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 215–37.
7.
BaconNicolasBlytonPaul. 2007. “Conflict for Mutual Gains?”Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 44, No. 5, pp. 814–34.
8.
BaileyThomas. 1993. Discretionary Effort and the Organization of Work: Employee Participation and Work Reform since Hawthorne. New York: Institute on Education and the Economy, Teachers College, Columbia University.
9.
BaileyThomasBergPeterSandyCarola. 2001. “The Effect Of High-Performance Work Practices on Employee Earnings in the Steel, Apparel, and Medical Electronics and Imaging Industries.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 54, No. 2, pp. 525–43.
10.
BattRosemary. 2002. “Managing Customer Service: Human Resource Practices, Quit Rates, and Sales Growth.”Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 587–97.
11.
BeckerBrian E.HuselidMark A., 1998. “High Performance Work Systems and Firm Performance: A Synthesis of Research and Managerial Implications.” In RowlandKendrith M.FerrisGerald R., eds., Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.
12.
BliesePaul. 2000. “Within-Group Agreement, Non-Independence, and Reliability: Implications for Data Aggregation and Analysis.” In KleinKatherine J.KozlowskiSteve W.J., eds., Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations, pp. 349–81. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
13.
BrysonAlexForthJohnKirbySimon. 2005. “High Involvement Management Practices, Trade Union Representation and Workplace Performance in Britain.”Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 451–91.
14.
CappelliPeterNeumarkDavid. 2001. “Do ‘High-Performance’ Work Practices Improve Establishment-Level Outcomes?”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 54, No. 4, pp. 737–75.
15.
CascioWayne F.YoungClifford E.MorrisJames R., 1997. “Financial Consequences of Employment-Change Decisions in Major U.S. Corporations.”Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 40, No. 5, pp. 1175–89.
16.
CombsJamesLiuYongmeiHallAngelaKetchenDavid. 2006. “How Much Do High-performance Work Practices Matter? A Meta-Analysis of Their Effects on Organizational Performance.”Personnel Psychology, Vol. 59, No. 3, pp. 501–28.
17.
CookeWilliam N.1994. “Employee Participation Programs, Group-Based Incentives, and Company Performance: A Union-Nonunion Comparison.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 47, No. 4, pp. 594–609.
18.
DaftRichard L.BeckerSelwyn W., 1978. Innovation in Organizations. New York: Elsevier North Holland.
19.
D'ArtDarylTurnerThomas. 2005. “Union Recognition and Partnership at Work: A New Legitimacy for Irish Trade Unions?”Industrial Relations Journal, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 121–39.
20.
DattaDeepak K.GuthrieJames P.WrightPatrick M., 2005. “HRM and Labor Productivity: Does Industry Matter?”Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 135–45.
21.
De MenezesLilian M.WoodStephen J., 2006. “The Reality of Flexible Work Systems in Britain.”International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 106–38.
22.
DelaneyJohn T.HuselidMark A., 1996. “The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Perceptions of Organizational Performance.”Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 949–69.
23.
DeleryJohn E.DotyHarold D., 1996. “Modes of Theorizing in Strategic Human Resource Management: Tests of Universalistic, Contingency, and Configurational Performance Predictions.”Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 802–35.
24.
EatonAddrienneVoosPaula. 1992. “Unions and Contemporary Innovations in Work Organization, Compensation, and Employee Participation.” In MishelLawrenceVoosPaula B., eds., Unions and Economic Competitiveness. Armonk, N. Y: M.E. Sharpe.
25.
FioritoJack. 2001. “Human Resource Management Practices and Worker Desires for Union Representation.”Journal of Labor Research, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 335–54.
26.
FioritoJackLowmanChristopherNelsonForrest. 1987. “The Impact of Human Resource Policies on Union Organizing.”Industrial Relations, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 113–26.
27.
FisherJohn. 1997. “The Challenge of Change: The. Positive Agenda of the TGWU.”International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 8, No. 6, pp. 797–806.
28.
FreemanRichardKleinerMorrisOstroffCheryl. 2000. “The Anatomy of Employee Involvement and Its Effects on Firms and Workers.” Unpublished paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass.
29.
FreemanRichard B.RogersJoel. 1999. What Workers Want. Ithaca, N.Y.: ILR Press (an imprint of Cornell University Press).
30.
GearyJohn F.1996. “Working at Restructuring Work in Europe: The Case of Team Working.”Irish Business and Administrative Research, Vol. 17, pp. 44–57.
31.
GearyJohn F.1999. “The New Workplace: Change at Work in Ireland.”International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 10, No. 5, pp. 870–90.
32.
GerhartBarry. 1999. “Human Resource Management and Firm Performance: Measurement Issues and Their Effect on Causal and Policy Inferences.” In WrightPatrickDyerLeeBoudreauJohnMilkovichGeorge, eds., Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Suppl. 4, pp. 31–51. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.
33.
GerhartBarryWrightPatrick M.McMahanGary C.SnellScott A., 2000. “Measurement Error in Research on Human Resources and Firm Performance: How Much Error Is There and How Does It Influence Effect Size Estimates?”Personnel Psychology, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 803–34.
34.
GittlemanMauryHorriganMichaelJoyceMary. 1998. “‘Flexible’ Workplace Practices: Evidence from a Nationally Representative Survey.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 99–115.
35.
GlickWilliam H.1985. “Conceptualizing and Measuring Organizational and Psychological Climate: Pitfalls in Multilevel Research.”Academy of Management Review, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 601–16.
36.
GodardJohn. 1997. “Whither Strategic Choice: Do Managerial IR Ideologies Matter?”Industrial Relations, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 206–28.
37.
GodardJohn. 1998. “Workplace Reforms, Managerial Objectives, and Managerial Outcomes.”International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 18–40.
38.
GodardJohn. 2004. “A Critical Assessment of the High-Performance Paradigm.”British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 349–78.
39.
GuestDavid. 1995. “Human Resource Management, Trade Unions, and Industrial Relations.” In StoreyJohn, ed., Human Resource Management: A Critical Text. London: Routledge.
40.
GuestDavidMichieJonathanConwayNeilSheehanMaura. 2003. “Human Resource Management and Corporate Performance in the UK.”British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 291–314.
41.
GuestDavidPecceiRiccardo. 2001. “Partnership at Work: Mutuality and the Balance of Advantage.”British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 207–36.
42.
GunniglePatrick. 1997. “More Rhetoric Than Reality: Enterprise-Level Industrial Relations Partnership in Ireland.”Economic and Social Review, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 179–200.
43.
GuthrieJames P.2001. “High Involvement Work Practices, Turnover, and Productivity: Evidence from New Zealand.”Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 180–90.
44.
GuthrieJames P.DattaDeepak K., 2008. “Dumb and Dumber: The Impact of Downsizing on Firm Performance as Moderated by Industry Conditions.”Organization Science, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 108–23.
45.
GuthrieJames P.FloodPatrick C.LiuWenchuanMacCurtainSarah. 2009. “High Performance Work Systems in Ireland: Human Resource and Organizational Outcomes.”International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 112–25.
46.
HarleyBill. 2001. “Team Membership and the Experience of Work in Britain: An Analysis of WERS98 Data.”Work, Employment and Society, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 721–42.
47.
HorganJustineMuhlauPeter. 2005. “Human Resource Management and Performance: A Comparative Study of Ireland and the Netherlands.”Management Review, Vol. 16, pp. 242–58.
48.
HuselidMark A.1995. “The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance.”Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 635–72.
49.
HuselidMark A.RauBarbara L., 1997. “The Determinants of High-Performance Work Systems: Cross Sectional and Longitudinal Analysis.” Proceedings of the 1997 Academy of Management Annual Meetings.
50.
JamesLarry R.1982. “Aggregation Bias in Estimates of Perceptual Agreement.”Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 67, No. 2, pp. 219–29.
51.
KanterRosabeth M.1988. “When a Thousand Flowers Bloom: Structural, Collective, and Social Conditions for Innovation in Organization.” In StawBarryCummingsLarry, eds., Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 10, pp. 169–211. Greenwich, Conn: JAI Press.
52.
KellyJohn. 1996. “Union Militancy and Social Partnership.” In AckersPeterSmithChrisSmithPaul, eds., The New Workplace and Trade Unionism. London: Routledge.
53.
KellyJohn. 1998. Rethinking Industrial Relations: Mobilization, Collectivism and Long Waves. London: Routledge.
54.
KizilosMarkReshefYonatan. 1997. “The Effect of Workplace Unionization on Worker Responses to HRM Innovation.”Journal of Labor Research, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 641–56.
55.
KochMarianne J.McGrathRuth G., 1996. “Improving Labor Productivity: Human Resource Management Policies Do Matter.”Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 335–54.
56.
KochanThomas. 1995. “Using the Dunlop Report to Achieve Mutual Gains.”Industrial Relations, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 350–66.
57.
KochanThomasMcKersieRobertChalykoffJohn. 1986. “The Effects of Corporate Strategy and Workplace Innovation on Union Representation.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 487–501.
58.
KochanThomasOstermanPaul. 1994. The Mutual Gains Enterprise. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
59.
LabovitizSanford. 1967. “Some Observations on Measurement and Statistics.”Social Forces, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 151–60.
60.
LaveryBrian. 2005. “Ferry Dispute Tests Ireland's Tolerance for Globalization.”New York Times, December 27.
61.
LeggeKaren. 1995. Human Resource Management: Rhetorics and Realities. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
62.
LevineDavid I.1995. Reinventing the Workplace: How Business and Employees Can Both Win. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
63.
LevineDavidTysonLaura. 1990. “Participation, Productivity, and the Firm's Environment.” In BlinderAlan S., ed., Paying for Productivity. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
64.
LiebensteinHarvey. 1966. “Allocative Efficiency vs. X-Efficiency.”American Economic Review, Vol. 56, No. 3, pp. 392–415.
65.
MacDuffieJohn P.1995. “Human Resource Bundles and Manufacturing Performance: Organizational Logic and Flexible Production Systems in the World Auto Industry.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 197–221.
66.
MachinStephenWoodStephen. 2005. “Human Resource Management as a Substitute for Trade Unions in British Workplaces.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 58, No. 2, pp. 201–18.
67.
MarksAbigailFindlayPatriciaMcKinlayAlanThompsonPaul. 1998. “The Politics of Partnership? Innovation in Employment Relations in the Scottish Spirits Industry.”British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 209–26.
68.
MarshallRay. 1992. “Work Organization, Unions, and Economic Performance.” In MishelLawrenceVoosPaula, eds., Unions and Economic Competitiveness, pp. 247–86. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe.
69.
MillwardNeil. 1994. The New Industrial Relations?London: Policy Studies Institute.
70.
MilnerSimonRichardEdward. 1991. “Determinants of Union Recognition and Employee Involvement: Evidence from the London Docklands.”British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 377–90.
71.
O'DonnellRoryTeaguePaul. 2000. Partnership at Work in Ireland: An Evaluation of Progress under Partnership 2000. Dublin: Department of An Taoiseach.
72.
OppenheimAbraham N.1966. Questionnaire Design and Attitude Measurement. New York: Basic Books.
73.
OrtizLuis. 1999. “Unions' Response to Teamwork: Differences at National and Workplace Level.”European Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 49–69.
74.
OstermanPaul. 1994. “How Common Is Workplace Transformation and Who Adopts It?”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 173–88.
75.
PerlmanSelig. 1928. A Theory of the Labor Movement. New York: MacMillan.
76.
PfefferJeffrey. 1994. Competitive Advantage through People: Unleashing the Power of the Work Force. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
77.
PfefferJeffrey. 1998. The Human Equation: Building Profits by Putting People First. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
78.
PilFrits K.MacDuffieJohn P., 1996. “The Adoption of High Involvement Work Practices.”Industrial Relations, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 423–55.
79.
RocheWilliam K.1999. “In Search of Commitment-Oriented Human Resource Management Practices and the Conditions That Sustain Them.”Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 36, No. 5, pp. 653–78.
80.
RocheWilliam K.AshmoreJacqueline. 2001. “Irish Unions in the 1990s: Testing the Limits of Social Partnership.” In GriffinGerry, ed., Changing Patterns of Trade Unionism: A Comparison of English Speaking Countries. London: Mansell.
81.
RocheWilliam K.GearyJohn F., 2002. “Advocates, Critics, and Union Involvement in Workplace Partnership: Irish Airport.”British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 659–88.
82.
RubensteinSaul. 2001. “Unions as Value-Adding Networks: Possibilities for the Future of U.S. Unionism.”Journal of Labor Research, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 581–98.
83.
RubinsteinSaulKochanThomas. 2001. Learning from Saturn. Ithaca, N.Y.: ILR Press (an imprint of Cornell University Press).
84.
StoreyJohn. 1992. Developments in Human Resource Management. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
85.
StreeckWolfgang. 1992. “National Diversity, Regime Competition, and Institutional Deadlock: Problems in Forming a European Industrial Relations System.”Journal of Public Policy, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 301–30.
86.
SubramonyMahesh. Forthcoming. “Meta-Analytic Investigation of the Relationship between Human Resource Management Bundles and Firm Performance.”Human Resource Management.
87.
TaylorCharlie. 2008. “Strike Threat ‘Won't Hit Guinness Supply.’”Irish Times, April 21.
88.
TurnerLowell. 1991. Democracy at Work: Changing World Markets and the Future of Labor Unions. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
89.
VermaAnil. 2005. “What Do Unions Do to the Workplace? Union Effects on Management and HRM Policies.”Journal of Labor Research, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 415–49.
90.
WallToby D.WoodStephen. 2005. “The Romance of Human Resource Management and Business Performance and the Case for Big Science.”Human Relations, Vol. 58, No. 4, pp. 1–34.
WellsDon. 1993. “Are Strong Unions Compatible with the New Model of Human Resource Management?”Relations Industrielles, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 56–85.
93.
WoodStephen. 1996. “High Commitment Management and Unionization in the UK.”International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 41–58.
94.
WoodStephende MenezesLillian. 1998. “High Commitment Management in the U.K.: Evidence from the Workplace Industrial Relations Survey, and Employers' Manpower and Skills Practices Survey.”Human Relations, Vol. 51, No. 4, pp. 485–515.
95.
YoundtMark A.SnellScott A.DeanJames W.LepakDavid P., 1996. “Human Resource Management, Manufacturing Strategy, and Firm Performance.”Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 836–65.
