Identifying the “Invisible Colleges” of the Industrial & Labor Relations Review: A Bibliometric Approach

Abstract

Since its inaugural issue in 1947, the Industrial and Labor Relations Review (ILRR) has been considered among the foremost industrial relations journals. Prominent among subjects treated by ILRRs articles in the journal's early years were collective bargaining and industrial strife, but the subject mix has changed greatly with the times. This paper employs bibliometric techniques to compare ILRR's intellectual bases across three recent periods: 1974–1984, 1985–1995, and 1996–2006. Using co-citation and network analyses, the authors identify the “invisible colleges”—research networks that refer to each other in their publications—of ILRR Economics-oriented journals were heavily cited by ILRR authors across the entire 33-year observation period, but there is evidence that another field, human resource management, was of growing importance in the most recent years.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Borgatti

Stephen P.

Everett

Martin G.

Freeman

Linton C.

, 2002. Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, Mass.: Analytic Technologies.

Crane

Diana

. 1972. Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communication. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Freeman

Linton

. 1979. “Centrality in Social Networks: I. Conceptual Clarifications.” Social Networks, Vol. 1, pp. 215–39.

Frege

Carola

. 2005. “Varieties of Industrial Relations Research: Takeover, Convergence, or Divergence?” British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 43, No. 2 (July), pp. 179–207.

Garfield

Eugene

. 1979. “Is Citation Analysis a Legitimate Evaluation Tool?” Scientometrics, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 359–75.

Gmur

Markus

. 2003. “Co-Citation Analysis and the Search for Invisible Colleges: A Methodological Evaluation.” Scientometrics, Vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 27–57.

Kaufman

Bruce E.

1993. The Origins and Evolution of the Field of Industrial Relations. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.

Lotka

Alfred J.

1926. “The Frequency Distribution of Scientific Productivity.” Journal of the Washington Academy of Science, Vol. 16, No. 12, pp. 317–23.

McCain

Katherine W.

1986. “Cocked Author Mapping as a Valid Representation of Intellectual Structure.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 111–22.

10.

Mullins

Nicholas C.

Hargens

Lowell L.

Hecht

Pamela K.

Kick

Edward L.

, 1977. “The Group Structure of Co-Citation Clusters: A Comparative Study.” American Sociological Review, Vol. 42, pp. 552–62.

11.

Persson

Ollie

. 2006. Bibexcel: A Tool for Bibliometricians. http://www.umu.se/inforsk.

12.

Price

Derek Desolla

. 1965. “Networks of Scientific Papers.” Science, Vol. 149, No. 3683, pp. 510–15.

13.

Scott

John

. 1991. Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.

14.

Small

Henry

. 1978. “Cited Documents as Concept Symbols.” Social Studies of Science, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 327–40.

15.

Small

Henry

. 1980. “Co-Citation Context Analysis and the Structure of Paradigms.” Journal of Documentation, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 183–96.

16.

Tijssen

Robert J.W.

1992. “Cartography of Science: Scientometric Mapping with Multidimensional Scaling Methods.” Doctoraatsdissertaie. Rijksuniveriseit Leiden: DSWO Press.

17.

Wasserman

Stanley

Faust

Katherine

. 1997. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.