This paper investigates determinants of the earnings distribution for native-born workers and immigrant workers in two countries. The authors, using data from the 2000 U.S. Census and 2001 Australian Census, employ a methodology (quantile regression) that facilitates measurement of the native-born/immigrant earnings differential and the partial effect of explanatory variables such as schooling and experience at each decile of the earnings distribution. They find evidence that schooling and labor market experience had stronger earnings effects at higher deciles. The native/immigrant earnings gap varied by decile, and in particular increased in the United States at higher deciles. The results suggest that in the United States minimum wages compressed earnings at low deciles, whereas in Australia the minimum (administered) wage system compressed earnings across the entire distribution. A pattern of higher earnings for immigrants than for the native-born at the lowest earnings decile in Australia may reflect favorable selectivity in migration.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbrechtJamesBjörklundAndersVromanSusan. 2003. “Is There a Glass Ceiling in Sweden?”Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 21, No. 1 (January), pp. 145–77.
2.
AntecolHeatherCobb-ClarkDeborah A.TrejoStephen. 2003. “Immigration Policy and the Skills of Immigrants to Australia, Canada, and the United States.”Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 38, No. 1 (Winter), pp. 192–218.
3.
AntecolHeatherKuhnPeterTrejoStephen. 2006. “Assimilation via Prices or Quantities? Sources of Immigrant Earnings Growth in Australia, Canada, and the United States.”Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 41, No. 4 (Fall), pp. 821–40.
4.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2001. Employee Earnings and Hours, Catalogue No. 6306.0. Canberra.
5.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2003. Technical Paper: Census of Population and Housing Household Sample File Australia 2001, Catalogue No. 2037.0. Canberra.
6.
AutorDavid H.KatzLawrence F.KearneyMelissa J. Schettini. 2005. “Rising Wage Inequality: The Role of Composition and Prices.” MIT Department of Economics Working Paper No. 05-22.
7.
BassettGilbertTarnMo-TinKnightKeith. 2002. “Quantile Models and Estimators for Data Analysis.”Metrika, Vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 17–26.
8.
BayardKimberlyHellersteinJudithNeumarkDavidTroskeKenneth. 2003. “New Evidence on Sex Segregation and Sex Differences in Wages from Matched Employee-Employer Data.”Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 21, No. 4 (October), pp. 887–922.
9.
BeachCharles M.WorswickChristopher. 1993. “Is There a Double-Negative Effect on the Earnings of Immigrant Women?”Canadian Public Policy, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 36–53.
10.
BedardKelly. 2003. “School Quality and the Distribution of Male Earnings in Canada.”Economics of Education Review, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 395–407.
11.
BeenstockMichaelChiswickBarry R.PaltielAri. 2005. “Endogenous Assimilation and Immigrant Adjustment in Longitudinal Data.” IZA Discussion Paper No. 1840, Bonn.
12.
BlinderAlan. 1973. “Wage Discrimination: Reduced Form and Structural Estimates.”Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 8, No. 4 (Fall), pp. 436–55.
13.
BuchinskyMoshe. 1998. “The Dynamics of Changes in the Female Wage Distribution in the USA: A Quantile Regression Approach.”Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 13, No. 1 (January), pp. 1–30.
14.
ButcherKristen F.DiNardoJohn. 2002. “The Immigrant and Native-Born Wage Distributions: Evidence from United States Censuses.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 56, No. 1 (October), pp. 97–121.
15.
ChiswickBarry R.1978. “The Effect of Americanization on the Earnings of Foreign-Born Men.”Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 86, No. 5 (October), pp. 897–921.
ChiswickBarry R.LeAnh T.MillerPaul W., 2006. “How Immigrants Fare across the Earnings Distribution: International Analyses.” IZA Discussion Paper No. 2405, Bonn.
18.
ChiswickBarry R.MillerPaul W., 2006. “An Explanation for the Lower Payoff to Schooling for the Foreign-Born in Australia.” Paper presented to the Conference of Economists, Curtin University, September.
19.
ChiswickBarry R.MillerPaul W., 2008. “Why Is the Payoff to Schooling Smaller for Immigrants?”Labour Economics, forthcoming.
20.
CortesKalena E.2004. “Are Refugees Different from Economic Immigrants? Some Empirical Evidence on the Heterogeneity of Immigrant Groups in the United States.”Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 86, No. 2 (May), pp. 465–80.
21.
DaneshvaryNasser. 1993. “Earnings Differentials between Natives and Immigrants with College Degree.”American Economist, Vol. 37, No. 2 (Fall), pp. 46–52.
22.
DuleepHarriet O.RegetsMark C., 1996. “The Elusive Concept of Immigrant Quality: Evidence from 1970–1990.” Discussion Paper PRIP-UI-41, Program for Research on Immigration Policy, Urban Institute, Washington, D.C.
23.
DuleepHarriet O.RegetsMark C., 1997. “Measuring Immigrant Wage Growth Using Matched CPS Files.”Demography, Vol. 34, No. 2 (May), pp. 239–49.
24.
EideEric R.ShowalterMark H.SimsDavid. 2002. “The Effects of Secondary School Quality on the Distribution of Earnings.”Contemporary Economic Policy, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 160–71.
25.
GarciaJaimeHernandezPedro J.Lopez-NicolasAngel. 2001. “How Wide Is the Gap? An Investigation of Gender Wage Differences Using Quantile Regression.”Empirical Economics, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 149–67.
26.
GreeleyAndrew M.1976. Ethnicity, Denomination, and Inequality. Sage Research Papers in the Social Sciences No. 4, Series No. 90-029 (Studies in Religion and Ethnicity). Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.
27.
HealyJoshRichardsonSue. 2006. “An Updated Profile of the Minimum Wage Work Force in Australia.”Australian Fair Pay Commission, Melbourne.
28.
KuhnPeterWeinbergerCatherine. 2005. “Leadership Skills and Wages.”Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 23, No. 3 (July), pp. 395–436.
29.
MachadoJosé A.MataJose. 2005. “Counterfactual Decomposition of Changes in Wage Distributions Using Quantile Regression.”Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 445–65.
MillerPaul W.NeoLeanne. 2003. “Labour Market Flexibility and Immigrant Adjustment.”Economic Record, Vol. 79, No. 246, pp. 336–56.
32.
MuellerRichard E.1998. “Public-Private Sector Wage Differentials in Canada: Evidence from Quantile Regressions.”Economics Letters, Vol. 60, No. 2 (August), pp. 229–35.
33.
NielsenHelenaRosholmMichael. 2001. “The Public-Private Sector Wage Gap in Zambia in the 1990s: A Quantile Regression Approach.”Empirical Economics, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 169–82.
34.
OaxacaRonald L.1973. “Male-Female Wage Differentials in Urban Labor Markets.”International Economic Review, Vol. 14, No. 3 (October), pp. 693–709.
35.
OECD. 2004. OECD Employment Outlook. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
36.
SakellariouChris. 2004. “Gender Earnings Differentials Using Quantile Regressions.”Journal of Labor Research, Vol. 25, No. 3 (Summer), pp. 457–68.
37.
YuengertAndrew M.1994. “Immigrant Earnings, Relative to What? The Importance of Earnings Function Specification and Comparison Points.”Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 71–90.
