Using data collected in 2003–2004 in national telephone surveys of 750 Canadian and 450 English workers, the author finds that alternative work practices (AWPs), such as autonomous teams, quality circles, and information sharing, provided meaningful pay gains for non-union workers but not union workers in both Canada and England. In Canada, non-union AWP payoffs approached union wage premia at even moderate levels of AWP adoption, suggesting that AWPs may serve as an alternative means to higher pay, one that is incompatible with unions and that could erode demand for union representation. In England, there was no meaningful union wage premium, suggesting that AWPs may have replaced pay bargaining as a means to higher pay; but an interaction term combining union representation and “best” HR practices bore a strong association with higher pay, consistent with a new economic role whereby unions achieve gains for their members through collaborative, performance-enhancing strategies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AckersPeterPayneJonathan. 1998. “British Trade Unions and Social Partnership: Rhetoric, Reality, and Strategy.”International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 9, No. 3 (September), pp. 529–50.
BaileyThomasBergPeterSandyCarola. 2001. “The Effect of High-Performance Work Practices on Employee Earnings in the Steel, Apparel, and Medical Electronics and Imaging Industries.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 54, No. 2A (March), pp. 525–43.
4.
BelmanDaleVoosPaula. 2004. “Changes in Union Wage Effects by Industry: A Fresh Look at the Evidence.”Industrial Relations, Vol. 43, No. 3 (July), pp. 491–520.
5.
BlackSandraLynchLisaKrivelyovaAnya. 2004. “How Workers Fare When Employers Innovate.”Industrial Relations, Vol. 43, No. 1 (January), pp. 44–66.
6.
BlanchflowerDavid G.BrysonAlex. 2003. “Changes over Time in Union Relative Wage Effects in the UK and the US Revisited.” In AddisonJohn T.SchnabelClaus, eds., International Handbook of Trade Unions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
7.
BlanchflowerDavid G.BrysonAlex. 2004. “What Effect Do Unions Have on Wages Now and Would Freeman and Medoff Be Surprised?”Journal of Labor Research, Vol. 25, No. 3 (Summer), pp. 383–414.
8.
BlanchflowerDavid G.FreemanRichard. 1992. “Unionism in the United States and Other Advanced OECD Countries.”Industrial Relations, Vol. 31, No. 1 (Winter), pp. 56–80.
9.
BrownWilliamDeakinSimonRyanPaul. 1997. “The Effect of British Industrial Relations Legislation, 1979–97.”National Institute Economic Review, Vol. 161, pp. 69–83.
10.
BrysonAlex. 2005. “The Size of the Union Membership Premium in Britain's Private Sector.” Unpublished manuscript, Policy Studies Institute, London.
11.
DelbridgeRick. 1998. Life on the Line in Contemporary Manufacturing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
DelbridgeRickWhitfieldKeith. 2001. “Employee Perceptions of Job Influence and Organizational Participation.”Industrial Relations, Vol. 40, No. 3 (July), pp. 472–89.
13.
FangTonyVermaAnil. 2002. “Union Wage Premium.”Perspectives on Labour and Income, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 17–23.
14.
ForthJohnMillwardNeil. 2002. “High Involvement Management and Pay in Britain.”Industrial Relations, Vol. 43, No. 1 (January), pp. 98–119.
15.
FreemanRichardPelletierJeffrey. 1990. “The Impact of Industrial Relations Legislation on British Union Density.”British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 28, No. 2 (July), pp. 141–64.
16.
GodardJohn. 2001. “High Performance and the Transformation of Work? The Implications of Alternative Work Practices for the Nature and Experience of Work.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 54, No. 4 (July), pp. 776–805.
17.
GodardJohn. 2004a. “The New Institutionalism, Capitalist Diversity, and Industrial Relations.” In KaufmanBruce, ed., Theoretical Perspectives on Work and the Employment Relationship, pp. 229–64. Urbana-Champaign: Industrial Relations Research Association.
18.
GodardJohn. 2004b. “A Critical Assessment of the High Performance Paradigm.”British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 42, No. 2 (July), pp. 349–78.
19.
GodardJohn. 2006. “Institutional Environments, Work and Human Resource Practices, and Unions: Canada vs. England.” Unpublished paper, University of Manitoba.
20.
GodardJohnDelaneyJohn. 2000. “Reflections on the High Performance Paradigm's Implications for IR as a Field.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 53, No. 2 (January), pp. 482–502.
21.
HallPeterSoskiceDavid. 2001. “An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism.” In HallPeterSoskiceDavid, eds., Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, pp. 1–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
HandelMichaelGittlemanMaury. 2004. “Is There a Payoff to Innovative Work Practices?”Industrial Relations, Vol. 43, No. 1 (January), pp. 67–97.
HeckmanJamesIchimuraHidehikoSmithJeffreyToddPetra. 1998. “Characterizing Selection Bias Using Experimental Data.”Econometrica, Vol. 66, No. 5 (September), pp. 1017–98.
25.
HowellChris. 2005. Trade Unions and the State. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
26.
LewisH. Gregg. 1986. Union Relative Wage Effects: A Survey. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
MachinStephen. 2000. “Union Decline in Britain.”British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 38, No. 4 (December), pp. 631–45.
28.
MachinStephenWoodStephen. 2005. “Human Resource Management as a Substitute for Trade Unions in British Workplaces.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 58, No. 2 (January), pp. 201–18.
29.
MarshallRay. 1996. “Work Organization: The Promise of High Performance Work Systems.” In SchaferToddFauxJeff, eds., Reclaiming Prosperity. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe.
30.
MongerJoanne. 2004. “International Comparisons of Labor Disputes in 2002.”Labor Market Trends, UK Office for National Statistics. April.
31.
OldhamGreg R.HackmanJ. Richard. 1980. Work Redesign. Redding, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
32.
OstermanPaul. 2006. “The Wage Effects of High Performance Work Organization in Manufacturing.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 59, No. 2 (January), pp. 187–204.
33.
OxenbridgeSarahBrownWilliam. 2004. “Achieving a New Equilibrium? The Stability of Cooperative Employer-Union Relationships.”Industrial Relations Journal, Vol. 35, No. 5, pp. 388–402.
34.
OxenbridgeSarahBrownWilliam. 2005. “Developing Partnership Relationships.” In StuartMarkLucioMiguel Martinez, eds., Partnership and Modernization in Employment Relations, pp. 83–100. London: Routledge.
35.
OxenbridgeSarahBrownWilliamDeakinSimonPrattenCliff. 2003. “Initial Response to the Statutory Recognition Provisions of the Employment Relations Act, 1999.”British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 41, No. 2 (July), pp. 315–34.
36.
RinehartJamesHuxleyChrisRobertsonDavid. 1997. Just Another Car Factory? Lean Production and Its Discontents. Ithaca, N.Y.: ILR Press (an imprint of Cornell University Press).
37.
SmithPaulMortonGary. 2000. “Employment Law: The Devil Is Not Only in the Detail but in the Values and Policy Too.”British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 39, No. 1 (March), pp. 119–38.
38.
WhiteMichael. 2005. “Cooperative Unionism and Employee Welfare.”Industrial Relations Journal, Vol. 36, No. 5, pp. 348–66.
39.
WoodStephenGodardJohn. 1999. “The Statutory Recognition Procedure in the Employment Relations Bill: A Comparative Analysis.”British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 37, No. 2 (July), pp. 203–45.
