The authors investigate how labor market institutions such as unemployment insurance, unions, firing regulations, and minimum wages have affected the evolution of wage inequality among male workers. Results of estimations using data on institutions in eleven OECD countries indicate that changes in labor market institutions can account for much of the change in wage inequality between 1973 and 1998. Factors found to have been negatively associated with male wage inequality are union density, the strictness of employment protection law, unemployment benefit duration, unemployment benefit generosity, and the size of the minimum wage. Over the 26-year period, institutional changes were associated with a 23% reduction in male wage inequality in France, where minimum wages increased and employment protection became stricter, but with an increase of up to 11% in the United States and United Kingdom, where unions became less powerful and (in the United States) minimum wages fell.
AcemogluDaronAghionPhilippeViolanteGiovanni L., 2001. “Deunionization, Technical Change, and Inequality.”Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, Vol. 55, No. 1 (December), pp. 229–64.
3.
AlesinaAlbertoPerottiRoberto. 1997. “The Welfare State and Competitiveness.”American Economic Review, Vol. 87, No. 5 (December), pp. 921–39.
4.
AutorDavidKatzLawrence F.KearneyMelissa S., 2005. “Trends in U.S. Wage Inequality: Re-Assessing the Revisionists.” NBER Working Paper No. 11627.
5.
BelotMichellevan OursJan C., 2001. “Unemployment and Labor Market Institutions: An Empirical Analysis.”Journal of Japanese and International Economics, Vol. 15, No. 4 (December), pp. 403–18.
6.
BelotMichellevan OursJan C., 2004. “Does the Recent Success of Some OECD Countries in Lowering Their Unemployment Rates Lie in the Clever Design of Their Labour Market Reforms?”Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 56, No. 4 (October), pp. 621–42.
7.
BertolaGiuseppe. 1999. “Microeconomic Perspectives on Aggregate Labor Markets.” In AshenfelterOrleyCardDavid, eds., Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 3C, pp. 2985–3028. North Holland: Amsterdam.
8.
BertolaGiuseppeBlauFrancine D.KahnLawrence M., 2002. “Comparative Analysis of Labor Market Outcomes: Lessons for the U.S. from International Long-Run Evidence.” In KruegerAlanSolowRobert, eds., The Roaring Nineties: Can Full Employment Be Sustained? pp. 159–218. New York: Russell Sage and Century Foundations.
9.
BertolaGiuseppeBlauFrancine D.KahnLawrence M., Forthcoming. “Labor Market Institutions and Demographic Employment Patterns.”Journal of Population Economics.
10.
BertolaGiuseppeRogersonRichard. 1997. “Institutions and Labor Reallocation.”European Economic Review, Vol. 41, No. 6, pp. 1147–71.
11.
BlanchardOlivierWolfersJustin. 2000. “The Role of Shocks and Institutions in the Rise of European Unemployment: The Aggregate Evidence.”Economic Journal, Conference Papers, Vol. 110, No. 462, pp. C1–33.
12.
BlauFrancine D.KahnLawrence M., 1996. “International Differences in Male Wage Inequality: Institutions versus Market Forces.”Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 104, No. 4 (August), pp. 791–837.
13.
BlauFrancine D.KahnLawrence M., 2005. “Do Cognitive Test Scores Explain Higher U.S. Wage Inequality?”Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 87, No. 1 (February), pp. 184–92.
14.
BoeriTitoConde-RuizJ. IgnacioGalassoVicenzo. 2006. “The Political Economy of Flexicurity.” Unpublished paper, Bocconi University. See also CEPR Discussion Paper No. 3990.
15.
CalmforsLarsDriffillJohn. 1988. “Bargaining Structure, Corporatism, and Macroeconomic Performance.”Economic Policy, Vol. 6, pp. 14–61.
16.
CardDavid. 2001. “The Effect of Unions on Wage Inequality in the U.S. Labor Market.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 54, No. 2 (January), pp. 296–315.
17.
CardDavidLemieuxThomasRiddellW. Craig. 2004. “Unions and Wage Inequality.”Journal of Labor Research, Vol. 25 (Fall), pp. 519–62.
18.
ChecchiDanieleLuciforaClaudio. 2002. “Unions and Labor Market Institutions in Europe.”Economic Policy, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 362–401.
19.
DaveriFrancescoTabelliniGuido. 2000. “Unemployment, Growth and Taxation in Industrial Countries.”Economic Policy, Vol. 15, No. 30, pp. 47–104.
20.
DickensRichardMachinStephen J.ManningAlan. 1999. “The Effects of Minimum Wages on Employment: Theory and Evidence from Britain.”Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 17, No. 1 (January), pp. 1–22.
21.
DiNardoJohnFortinNicoleLemieuxThomas. 1996. “Labor Market Institutions and the Distribution of Wages: A Semi-Parametric Approach.”Econometrica, Vol. 64, No. 5 (September), pp. 1001–44.
22.
EbbinghausBernhardVisserJelle. 2000. Trade Unions in Western Europe since 1945. New York: Macmillan.
23.
EdinPer-AndersHolmlundBertil. 1995. “The Swedish Wage Structure: The Rise and Fall of Solidarity Wage Policy?” In FreemanRichard B.KatzLawrence F., eds., Differences and Changes in Wage Structures, pp. 307–43. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
EricksonChrisIchinoAndrea. 1995. “Wage Differentials in Italy: Market Forces, Institutions, and Inflation.” In FreemanRichard B.KatzLawrence F., eds., Differences and Changes in Wage Structures, pp. 265–305. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
HuberEvelyneRaginCharlesStephensJohn D., 1997. Comparative Welfare States Data Set. Northwestern University and University of North Carolina.
26.
IchinoAndreaPoloMicheleRettoreEnrico. 2003. “Are Judges Biased by Labor Market Conditions?”European Economic Review, Vol. 47, No. 5 (October), pp. 913–44.
27.
ILO. 1997. World Labour Report 1997–98: Industrial Relations, Democracy, and Social Stability. Geneva.
28.
KahnLawrence M.2000. “Wage Inequality, Collective Bargaining, and Relative Employment from 1985 to 1994: Evidence from Fifteen OECD Countries.”Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 82, No. 4 (November), pp. 564–79.
29.
KoenigerWinfriedLeonardiMarco. Forthcoming. “Capital Deepening and Wage Differentials: Germany vs. US.”Economic Policy.
30.
KoenigerWinfriedLeonardiMarcoNunziataLuca. 2004. “Labor Market Institutions and Wage Inequality.” IZA Discussion Paper No. 1291.
31.
LazearEdward P.1990. “Job Security Provisions and Employment.”Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 105, No. 3 (August), pp. 699–726.
32.
LeeDavid S.1999. “Wage Inequality in the United States During the 1980s: Rising Dispersion or Falling Minimum Wage?”Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 114, No. 3 (August), pp. 977–1023.
33.
MachinStephen J.1997. “The Decline of Labour Market Institutions and the Rise in Wage Inequality in Britain.”European Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 41, No. 3–5 (April), pp. 647–58.
34.
MachinStephen J.van ReenenJohn. 1998. “Technology and Changes in Skill Structure: Evidence from Seven OECD Countries.”Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 113, No. 4 (November), pp. 1215–44.
35.
ManacordaMarco. 2004. “Can the Scala Mobile Explain the Fall and Rise of Earnings Inequality in Italy? A Semiparametric Analysis, 1977–93.”Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 22, No. 3 (July), pp. 585–613.
36.
NickellStephenNunziataLucaOchelWolfgang. 2005. “Unemployment in the OECD Since the 1960s: What Do We Know?”Economic Journal, Vol. 115, No. 1 (January), pp. 1–27.
37.
NunziataLuca. 2005. “Institutions and Wage Determination: A Multi-Country Approach.”Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 67, No. 4 (August), pp. 435–66.
38.
TeulingsCoenHartogJoop. 1998. Corporatism or Competition ? Labour Contracts, Institutions, and Wage Structures in International Comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
TopelRobert H.1994. “Regional Labor Markets and the Determinants of Wage Inequality.”American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 84, No. 2 (May), pp. 17–22.
40.
VisserJelle. 1996. Unionisation Trends: The OECD Countries Union Membership File. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, Centre for Research of European Societies and Labour Relations.
41.
WallersteinMichael. 1990. “Centralized Bargaining and Wage Restraint.”American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 34, No. 4 (November), pp. 982–1004.
42.
WallersteinMichael. 1999. “Wage-Setting Institutions and Pay Inequality in Advanced Industrial Societies.”American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 43, No. 3 (July), pp. 649–80.
