Theory suggests that firms confront a hold-up problem in dealing with workplace unionism: unions will appropriate a portion of the quasi-rents stemming from long-lived capital. As a result, firms may be expected to limit their exposure to rent-seeking by reducing investments. The U.S. evidence points clearly in this direction. The authors of this paper investigate whether the same is true for German works councils, the analogue of workplace unionism in that nation. Using establishment panel data for the years 1998–2003, they find no evidence that a works council's formation adversely affected investment or that its dissolution favorably affected investment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AddisonJohn T.BelfieldClive. 2004. “Union Voice.”Journal of Labor Research, Vol. 25, No. 4 (Fall), pp. 563–96.
2.
AddisonJohn T.BellmannLutzSchnabelClausWagnerJoachim. 2003. “German Works Councils Old and New: Incidence, Coverage, and Determinants.”Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 123, No. 3, pp. 339–58.
3.
AddisonJohn T.ChiltonJohn. 1998. “Self-Enforcing Union Contracts: Efficient Investment and Employment.”Journal of Business, Vol. 71, No. 3 (July), pp. 349–69.
4.
AddisonJohn T.KraftKorneliusWagnerJoachim. 1993. “German Works Councils and Firm Behavior.” In KaufmanBruce E.KleinerMorris M., eds., Employee Representation: Alternatives and Future Directions. Madison, Wis.: Industrial Relations Research Association, pp. 305–38.
5.
AddisonJohn T.SchnabelClausWagnerJoachim. 2001. “Works Councils in Germany: Their Effects on Establishment Performance.”Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 53, No. 4 (October), pp. 659–94.
6.
AddisonJohn T.SchnabelClausWagnerJoachim. 2004. “The Course of Research into the Economic Consequences of German Works Councils.”British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 42, No. 2 (June), pp. 255–81.
7.
BaldwinCarliss Y.1983. “Productivity and Labor Unions: An Application of the Theory of Self-Enforcing Contracts.”Journal of Business, Vol. 56, No. 2 (April), pp. 155–85.
8.
BensonJohn. 1994. “The Economic Effects of Unionism on Japanese Manufacturing Enterprises.”British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 32, No. 1 (March), pp. 1–21.
9.
BondStephenHarhoffDietmarVan ReenenJohn. 2003. “Investment, R&D, and Financial Constraints in Britain and Germany.” CEP Discussion Paper No. 595, London School of Economics, December.
10.
BondStephenVan ReenenJohn. 2003. “Micro-econometric Models of Investment and Employment.” Unpublished paper, Nuffield College, Oxford.
11.
BronarsStephen G.DeereDonald R., 1993. “Unionization, Incomplete Contracting, and Capital Investment.”Journal of Business, Vol. 66, No. 1 (January), pp. 117–32.
12.
BronarsStephen G.DeereDonald R.TracyJoseph S., 1994. “The Effects of Unions on Firm Behavior: An Empirical Analysis Using Firm-Level Data.”Industrial Relations, Vol. 33, No. 4 (October), pp. 426–51.
13.
CavanaughJoseph K.1998. “Asset-Specific Investment and Unionized Labor.”Industrial Relations, Vol. 37, No. 1 (January), pp. 35–50.
14.
DennyKevinNickellStephen J., 1992. “Unions and Investment in British Industry.”Economic Journal, Vol. 102, No. 413 (July), pp. 874–87.
15.
FallickBruce C.HassettKevin A., 1999. “Investment and Union Certification.”Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 17, No. 3 (July), pp. 570–82.
16.
FreemanRichard B.MedoffJames L., 1984. What Do Unions Do?New York, N.Y.: Basic Books.
17.
FreemanRichard B.LazearEdward P., 1995. “An Economic Analysis of Works Councils.” In RogersJoelStreeckWolfgang, eds., Works Councils: Consultation, Representation and Cooperation in Industrial Relations. Chicago: Chicago University Press, pp. 27–52.
18.
GerlachKnutHüblerOlafMeyerWolfgang. 2002. “Investitionen, Weiterbildung und betriebliche Reorganisation.”Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 546–65.
19.
GroutPaul A.1984. “Investment and Wages in the Absence of Binding Contracts: A Nash Bargaining Approach.”Econometrica, Vol. 46, No. 2 (March), pp. 449–60.
20.
HeckmanJamesLaLondeRobertSmithJeffrey. 1999. “The Economics and Econometrics of Active Labor Market Programs.” In AshenfelterOrley C.CardDavid, eds., Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 3A. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 1865–2097.
21.
HirschBarry T.1991. Labor Unions and the Economic Performance of Firms. Kalamazoo, Mich.: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
22.
HirschBarry T.1992. “Firm Investment Behavior and Collective Bargaining Strategy.”Industrial Relations, Vol. 31, No. 1 (Winter), pp. 95–121.
23.
HirschBarry T.PrasadKislaya. 1995. “Wage-Employment Determination and a Union Tax on Capital: Can Theory and Evidence Be Reconciled?”Economics Letters, Vol. 48, No. 1 (April), pp. 61–71.
24.
HüblerOlaf. 2003. “Zum Einfluss des Betriebsrates in mittelgroßen Unternehmen auf Investitionen, Löhne, Produktivität und Renten—Empirische Befunde.” In GoldschmidtNils, ed., Wunderbare Wirtschafts Welt—Die New Economy und ihre Herausforderungen. Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 77–94.
25.
HüblerOlafJirjahnUwe. 2003. “Works Councils and Collective Bargaining in Germany: The Impact on Productivity and Wages.”Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 50, No. 4 (September), pp. 471–91.
26.
JorgensonDale. 1963. “Capital Theory and Investment Behavior.”American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 53, No. 2 (May), pp. 247–59.
27.
KircheschKai. 2004. “Financial Risks, Bankruptcy Probabilities, and the Investment Behaviour of Enterprises.” HWWA Institute for Economic Research Discussion Paper No. 299, Hamburg, October.
28.
KöllingArnd. 2000. “The IAB-Establishment Panel.”Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 120, No. 2, pp. 291–300.
29.
KraftKorneliusStankJörg. 2004. “Die Auswirkungen der gesetzlichen Mitbestimmung auf die Innovationsaktivität deutscher Unternehmen.”Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 124, No. 3, pp. 421–49.
30.
LeuvenEdwinSianesiBarbara. 2003. “PSMATCH2: Stata Module to Perform Full Mahalanobis and Propensity Score Matching, Common Support Graphing, and Covariate Imbalance Testing.”Statistical Software Components S432001, Department of Economics, Boston College.
31.
MachinStephenWadhwaniSushil. 1991. “The Effects of Unions on Investment and Innovation—Evidence from WIRS.”Economic Journal, Vol. 101, No. 405 (March), pp. 324–30.
32.
Menezes-FilhoNaercioVan ReenenJohn. 2003. “Unions and Innovation: A Survey of the Theory and Empirical Evidence.” In AddisonJohn T.SchnabelClaus, eds., International Handbook of Trade Unions. Cheltenham, England, and Northampton, Mass.: Edward Elgar, pp. 293–334.
33.
Müller-JentschWalter. 1995. “Germany: From Collective Voice to Co-Management.” In RogersJoelStreeckWolfgang, eds., Works Councils: Consultation, Representation and Cooperation in Industrial Relations. Chicago: Chicago University Press, pp. 53–78.
34.
NeubäumerRenateKohautSusanne. 2002. “Unternehmen investieren nicht nur in Sachkapital.”Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, Vol. 72, No. 4, pp. 403–27.
35.
OdgersCameron W.BettsJulian R., 1997. “Do Unions Reduce Investment? Evidence from Canada.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 51, No. 1 (October), pp. 18–36.
36.
RubinDon. 1974. “Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Non-randomized Studies.”Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 66, pp. 688–701.
37.
SchnabelClausWagnerJoachim. 1994. “Industrial Relations and Trade Union Effects on Innovation in Germany.”Labour, Vol. 8, No. 3 (Autumn), pp. 489–503.
38.
Van der PloegFrederick. 1987. “Trade Unions and Investment: A Noncooperative Approach.”European Economic Review, Vol. 31, No. 4 (October), pp. 1465–92.
