Using harmonized data for the years 1995–2001 from the European Community Household Panel, the authors analyze gender pay gaps by sector across the wage distribution in eleven countries. In estimations that control for the effects of individual characteristics at different points of the distribution, they calculate the part of the gap attributable to differing returns between men and women. The magnitude of the gender pay gap, thus measured, varied substantially across countries and across the public and private sector wage distributions. The gap typically widened toward the top of the wage distribution (the “glass ceiling” effect), and in a few cases it also widened at the bottom (the “sticky floor” effect). The authors suggest that differences in childcare provision and wage setting institutions across EU countries may partly account for the variation in patterns by country and sector.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AcemogluDaronPischkeJörn-Steffen. 1999. “The Structure of Wages and Investment in General Training.”Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 107, No. 3 (June), pp. 539–72.
2.
AcemogluDaronPischkeJörn-Steffen. 2003. “Minimum Wages and On-the-job Training.”Research in Labor Economics, Vol. 22, pp. 159–202.
3.
AlbrechtJamesBjorklundAndersVromanSusan. 2003. “Is There a Glass Ceiling in Sweden?”Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 21, No. 1 (January), pp. 145–77.
4.
ArulampalamWijiBoothAlison L.BryanMark L., 2004. “Training and the New Minimum Wage.”Economic Journal, Vol. 114, No. 494 (March), pp. C87–C94.
5.
BlackabyDavidBoothAlison L.FrankJeff. 2005. “Outside Offers and the Gender Pay Gap.”Economic Journal, Vol. 115 (February), pp. F81–F107.
6.
BlauFrancine D.KahnLawrence M., 1992. “The Gender Earnings Gap: Learning from International Comparisons.”American Economic Review, Vol. 82, No. 2 (May), pp. 533–38.
7.
BlauFrancine D.KahnLawrence M., 1996. “Wage Structure and Gender Earnings Differentials: An International Comparison.”Economica, Vol. 63, No. 25—Supplement: Economic Policy and Income Distribution, pp. S29–S62.
8.
BlauFrancine D.KahnLawrence M., 2003. “Understanding International Differences in the Gender Pay Gap.”Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 21, No. 1 (January), pp. 106–44.
9.
BlinderAlan. 1973. “Wage Discrimination: Reduced Form and Structural Estimates.”Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 8, No. 4 (Fall), pp. 436–55.
10.
BoeriTitoBrugiaviniAgarCalmforsLars, eds. 2001. The Role of Unions in the Twenty-First Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
BoothAlison L.1995. The Economics of the Trade Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
BoothAlison L.FrancesconiMarco. 2003. “Union Coverage and Non-Standard Work in Britain.”Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 55, No. 3 (July), pp. 383–416.
13.
BoothAlison L.FrancesconiMarcoFrankJeff. 2003. “A Sticky Floors Model of Promotion, Pay, and Gender.”European Economic Review, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 295–322.
14.
BuchinskyMoshe. 1998. “Recent Advances in Quantile Regression Models.”Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 33, No. 1 (Winter), pp. 88–126.
15.
De la RicaSaraDoladoJuan J.LlorensVanesa. 2005. “Ceiling and Floors: Gender Wage Gaps by Education in Spain.”Bonn, Germany: IZA Discussion Paper No. 1483.
16.
Del RioCoralGradínCarlosCantóOlga. 2005. “The Measurement of Gender Wage Discrimination: The Distributional Approach Revisited.” Working Paper No. 25, ECINEQ (Society for the Study of Economic Inequality).
17.
DoladoJuan J.KramarzFrancisMachinStephenManningAlanMargolisDavidTeulingsCoen. 1996. “The Economic Impact of Minimum Wages in Europe.”Economic Policy, Vol. 23 (October), pp. 319–72.
18.
Eurostat. 2003. Eurostat Yearbook 2003: The Statistical Guide to Europe: Data 1991–2001. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
19.
EvansJohn M.2001. “Firms' Contribution to the Reconciliation between Work and Family Life.”Paris: Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Papers No. 45, OECD.
20.
FitzenbergerBernd. 1998. “The Moving Blocks Bootstrap and Robust Inference for Linear Least Squares and Quantile Regressions.”Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 82, pp. 235–87.
21.
JaumotteFlorence. 2003. “Female Labour Force Participation: Past Trends and Main Determinants in OECD Countries.”Paris: Economics Department Working Paper No. 376, OECD.
LandersRenée M.RebitzerJames B.TaylorLowell J., 1996. “Rat Race Redux: Adverse Selection in the Determination of Work Hours in Law Firms.”American Economic Review, Vol. 86, No. 3 (June), pp. 329–48.
24.
LuciforaCloudioMeursDominique. 2004. “The Public Sector Pay Gap in France, Great Britain, and Italy.”Bonn, Germany: IZA Discussion Paper No. 1041.
25.
MachadoJoseMataJose. 2005. “Counterfactual Decomposition of Changes in Wage Distributions Using Quantile Regression.”Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 20, No. 4 (May/June), pp. 445–65.
26.
OaxacaRonald L.1973. “Male Female Wage Differentials in Urban Labor Markets.”International Economic Review, Vol. 14, No. 3 (October), pp. 693–709.
27.
OECD. 1996. “Earnings Inequality, Low-Paid Employment and Earnings Mobility.” Chapter 3 of Employment Outlook. Paris: OECD.
28.
OECD. 2001. “Balancing Work and Family Life: Helping Parents into Paid Employment.” Chapter 4 of Employment Outlook. Paris: OECD, June.
29.
PylkkänenElinaSmithNina2004. “The Impact of Family Friendly Policies in Denmark and Sweden on Mothers' Career Interruptions Due to Childbirth.”Bonn, Germany: IZA Discussion Paper No. 1050, March.
30.
RuhmChristopher J.1998. “The Economic Consequences of Parental Leave Mandates: Lessons from Europe.”Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 113, No. 1 (February), pp. 285–317.
31.
StevensMargaret. 1994. “A Theoretical Model of On-the-job Training with Imperfect Competition.”Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 46, pp. 537–62.
32.
WaldfogelJane. 1998. “The Family Gap for Young Women in the United States and Britain: Can Maternity Leave Make a Difference?”Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 16, No. 3 (July), pp. 505–45.
