It is commonly claimed that the South African labor market is unusually inflexible owing to the strength of the country's unions and the system of centralized collective bargaining. One sign of labor market inflexibility is low responsiveness of wages to local unemployment. Analyzing data from the South African Living Standards Survey, the authors find that the elasticity of wages with respect to local unemployment rates in South Africa in 1993 was about-0.1. The similarity of this elasticity to that found in other countries, including the United States and the United Kingdom, is surprising given South Africa's national unemployment rate of over 30%. The wage curve elasticity persists over a much wider range of unemployment rates in South Africa than in OECD countries, implying that unemployment in South Africa can have a large impact on wages.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AngristJoshua D.ImbensGuido W.RubinDonald B., 1996. “Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables.”Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 91, No. 434 (June), pp. 444–55.
2.
BanerjeeB.1983. “The Role of the Informal Sector in the Migration Process: A Test of Probabilistic Migration Models and Labour Market Segmentation for India.”Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 399–422.
3.
BlanchflowerDavid G.1997. “Changes over Time in Union Relative Wage Effects in Great Britain and the United States.” NBER Working Paper No. 6100.
4.
BlanchflowerDavid G.OswaldAndrew J., 1990. “The Wage Curve.”Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Vol. 92, No. 2, pp. 215–35.
5.
BlanchflowerDavid G.OswaldAndrew J., 1993. “Testing for a U-Shaped Wage Curve: A Response.”Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Vol. 95, No. 2, pp. 245–48.
6.
BlanchflowerDavid G.OswaldAndrew J., 1994. The Wage Curve. London: MIT Press.
7.
BoccaraBrunoMollPeter. 1997. “Labour Market Flexibility and Industrial Councils in South Africa.” Mimeo, The World Bank, Africa Region.
8.
BoundJohnJaegerDavid A.BakerRegina M., 1995. “Problems with Instrumental Variable Estimation when the Correlation between the Instrument and the Endogenous Explanatory Variable Is Weak.”Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 90, No. 430 (June), pp. 443–50.
9.
ButcherKristinRouseCecilia. 2001. “Wage Effects of Unions and Industrial Councils in South Africa.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 54, No. 2 (January), pp. 349–74.
10.
CardDavid. 1995. “The Wage Curve: A Review.”Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 33, No. 2 (June), pp. 785–99.
11.
CarruthAlan A.OswaldAndrew J., 1987. “Wage Inflexibility in Britain.”Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 49, pp. 59–78.
12.
CaseAnneDeatonAngus. 1999. “School Inputs and Educational Outcomes in South Africa.”Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 114, No. 3 (August), pp. 1047–84.
13.
Central Statistical Service. 1994. South African Labour Statistics. Pretoria, July.
14.
HallRobert E.1970. “Why Is the Unemployment Rate So High at Full Employment?”Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 3, pp. 369–402.
15.
HarrisJohnTodaroMichael. 1970. “Migration, Unemployment, and Development: A Two-Sector Analysis.”American Economic Review, Vol. 60, No. 1 (March), pp. 126–42.
16.
HoddinottJohn. 1996. “Wages and Unemployment in an Urban African Labour Market.”Economic Journal, Vol. 106, No. 439, pp. 1610–26.
17.
KanburRaviGrootaertChristiaan. 1994. “A New Regional Price Index for Cote d'Ivoire Using Data from International Comparisons Project.”Journal of African Economies, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 114–41.
18.
KingdonGeetaKnightJohn. 2004. “Unemployment in South Africa: The Nature of the Beast.”World Development, Vol. 32, No. 3 (March), pp. 391–408.
19.
KingdonGeetaKnightJohn. 2006 (in press). “The Measurement of Unemployment When Unemployment is High.”Labour Economics, Vol. 13, No. 2 (April).
20.
KnightJohn. 1982. “The Nature of Unemployment in South Africa.”South African Journal of Economics, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 1–12.
21.
LewisJeffrey D.2002. Promoting Growth and Employment in South Africa. Africa Region Working Paper Series, No. 32, World Bank.
22.
MollPeter G.1993. “Black South African Unions: Relative Wage Effects in International Perspective.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 46, No. 2 (January), pp. 245–61.
23.
MollPeter G.1996a. “Compulsory Centralization of Collective Bargaining in South Africa.”American Economic Review, Vol. 86, No. 2 (May), pp. 326–29.
24.
MollPeter G.1996b. “The Collapse of Primary Schooling Returns in South Africa, 1960–90.”Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 58, No. 1, pp. 185–210.
25.
MoultonBrent. 1990. “An Illustration of a Pitfall in Estimating the Effects of Aggregate Variables in Micro Units.”Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 72, No. 2 (May), pp. 334–38.
26.
PencavelJohn H.1994. “British Unemployment: Letter from America.”Economic Journal, Vol. 104, No. 424, pp. 621–32.
27.
SchultzT. PaulMwabuGermano. 1998. “Labor Unions and the Distribution of Wages and Employment in South Africa.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Volume 51, No. 4 (July), pp. 680–703.
28.
ShapiroCarlStiglitzJoseph E., 1984. “Equilibrium Unemployment as a Worker Discipline Device.”American Economic Review, Vol. 74, No. 2 (May), pp. 433–44.
29.
StandingGuySenderJohnWeeksJohn. 1996. Restructuring the Labour Market: The South Africa Challenge. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office.
30.
StatsSA. 1998. Unemployment and Employment in South Africa. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa.
31.
StatsSA. 2002. South African Statistics 2002. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa.
32.
StatsSA. 2003. Labour Force Survey, March 2003. Statistical Release P0210. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa.
33.
StiglitzJoseph E.1974. “Alternative Theories of the Determination of Wages and Unemployment in LDCs: The Labor Turnover Model.”Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 88, No. 2 (May), pp. 194–227.
34.
Van der Meulen RodgersYanaNatarajSita. 1999. “Labor Market Flexibility in East Asia: Lessons from Taiwan.”Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 48, No. 1 (October), pp. 51–69.
35.
World Economic Forum. 1999. The Global Competitiveness Report 1999. Geneva.
