In 1993, then-President Clinton issued a landmark executive order mandating labor-management partnerships in the federal service. The authors examine a unique set of data on the operations and effects of 60 partnerships that covered several hundred thousand federal employees. These data, plus evidence on the broader federal sector, show that partnerships provided a forum for collaborative communications and joint decision-making, improved the labor relations climate, reduced labor-management disputes, and modestly improved organizational performance. Analyses of survey results from partnership-council representatives show that perceptions of communications and decision-making were positively correlated with labor relations climate and organizational performance. The authors discuss the implications of their results for labor-management cooperation generally and labor relations in the federal sector specifically.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BanCarolyn. 1995. “Unions, Management, and the NPR.” In KettlDonald F.DilulioJohn J.Jr., eds., Inside the Reinvention Machine: Appraising Government Reform. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, pp. 131–51.
2.
BelmanDaleGundersonMorleyHyattDouglas, eds. 1996. Public Sector Employment in a Time of Transition. Madison, Wis.: Industrial Relations Research Association.
3.
BluestoneBarryBluestoneIrving. 1992. Negotiating the Future: A Labor Perspective on American Business. New York: Basic Books.
4.
HamiltonBooz Allen (a strategic management and technology consulting firm). 1999. U.S. Customs Service: Cost Benefit Analysis of the Labor-Management Partnership. January 11.
5.
BrockJonathanLipskyDavid B., eds. 2003a. Going Public: The Role of Labor-Management Relations in Delivering Quality Government Services. Champaign, Ill.: Industrial Relations Research Association.
6.
jonathanBrockLipskyDavid B., 2003b. “Public Sector Collective Bargaining and the Imperative for Service Delivery: An Overview.” In Brock and Lipsky 2003a, op. cit., pp. 1–22.
7.
CookeWilliam N.1989. “Improving Productivity and Quality through Collaboration.”Industrial Relations, Vol. 28, No. 2 (Spring), pp. 299–319.
8.
CookeWilliam N.1990a. “Factors Influencing the Effect of Joint Union-Management Programs on Employee-Supervisor Relations.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 43, No. 5 (July), pp. 587–603.
9.
CookeWilliam N.1990b. Labor-Management Cooperation. Kalamazoo, Mich.: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
10.
CookeWilliam N.1992. “Product Quality Improvement through Employee Participation: The Effects of Unionization and Joint Union-Management Administration.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 46, No. 1 (October), pp. 119–34.
11.
CookeWilliam N.1994. “Employee Participation Programs, Group-Based Incentives, and Company Performance: A Union-Nonunion Comparison.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 47, No. 4 (July), pp. 594–619.
12.
Cutcher-GershenfeldJoel. 1991. “The Impact on Economic Performance of a Transformation in Workplace Relations.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 44, No. 2 (January), pp. 241–60.
13.
DastmalchianAliBlytonPaulAdamsonRaymond. 1989. “Industrial Relations Climate: Testing a Construct.”Journal of Occupational Psychology, Vol. 62, pp. 21–32.
14.
DoeringerPeter B.KaboolianLindaWatkinsMichaelWatsonAudrey. 1996. “Beyond the Merit Model: New Directions at the Federal Workplace.” In Belman, eds., op. cit., pp. 163–200.
15.
FreemanRichardMedoffJames. 1984. What Do Unions Do?New York: Basic Books.
16.
GittellJody Hoffervon NordenflychtAndrewKochanThomas A., 2004. “Mutual Gains or Zero Sum? Labor Relations and Firm Performance in the Airline Industry.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 57, No. 2 (January), pp. 163–80.
17.
GriffinMark A.HofmannDavid A., 1997. “Hierarchical Linear Models in Organizational Research: Cross-Level Interactions.”Research Methods Forum, No. 2 (Summer), http://aom.pace.edu.
18.
HammerTove H.CurrallSteven C.SternRobert. 1991. “Worker Representation on Boards of Directors: A Study of Competing Roles.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 44, No. 4 (July), pp. 661–80.
19.
HammerTove H.SternRobert N., 1986. “A Yo-Yo Model of Cooperation: Union Participation in Management at the Rath Packing Company.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 39, No. 3 (April), pp. 337–49.
20.
HofmannDavid A.1997. “An Overview of the Logic and Rationale of Hierarchical Linear Models—A Special Issue: Focus on Hierarchical Linear Modeling.”Journal of Management, Vol. 23, No. 6 (November/December), pp. 723–45.
21.
KahnLawrence M.1993. “Unions and Cooperative Behavior: The Effect of Discounting.”Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 11, No. 4 (October), pp. 680–704.
22.
KatzHarryKochanThomasGobeilleKenneth. 1983. “Industrial Relations Performance, Economic Performance, and Quality of Working Life Efforts.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 37, No. 1 (October), pp. 3–17.
23.
KatzHarryKochanThomasKeefeJeffrey. 1987. “Industrial Relations and Productivity in the U.S. Automobile Industry.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Special Issue on Microeconomics, Vol. 3, pp. 685–715.
24.
KatzHarryKochanThomasWeberMark. 1985. “Assessing the Effects of Industrial Relations and Quality of Work Life Efforts on Organizational Effectiveness.”Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 28, No. 3 (September), pp. 509–26.
25.
KearneyRichard C.HaysSteven W., 1994. “Labor-Management Relations and Decision-Making: Toward a New Paradigm.”Public Administration Review, Vol. 54, No. 1 (January/February), pp. 44–51.
26.
KeefeJeffrey H.2003. “Can Unions Be Transformational Agents in Public Sector Workplace Redesign?” In Brock and Lipsky 2003a, op. cit., pp. 211–34.
27.
KettlDonald F.DilulioJohn J.Jr., eds. Inside the Reinvention Machine: Appraising Government Reform. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
28.
KochanThomas A.OstermanPaul. 1994. The Mutual Gains Enterprise: Forging a Winning Partnership among Labor, Management, and Government. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.
29.
KochanThomas A.RubinsteinSaul A., 2000. “Toward a Stakeholder Theory of the Firm: The Saturn Partnership.”Organization Science, Vol. 11, No. 4 (July/August), pp. 367–88.
30.
LevineDavid L.1995. Reinventing the Workplace: How Business and Employees Can Both Win. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
31.
MastersMarick F.2001. A Final Report to the National Partnership on Evaluating Progress and Improvements in Agencies ' Organizational Performance Resulting from Labor-Management Partnerships.
32.
MastersMarick F.2004. “Federal-Sector Unions: Current Status and Future Directions.”Journal of Labor Research, Vol. 25, No. 1 (Winter), pp. 55–82.
33.
MastersMarick F.AlbrightRobert R., 2003. “Federal Labor-Management Partnerships: Perspectives, Performance, and Possibilities.” In Brock and Lipsky 2003a, op. cit., pp. 171–210.
34.
National Performance Review. 1993. From Red Tape to Results: Creating a Government That Works Better and Costs Less. Washington, D.C.: National Performance Review.
35.
NorsworthyJ. R.ZabalaCraig A., 1985. “Worker Attitudes, Worker Behavior, and Productivity in the U.S. Automobile Industry, 1959–1976.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 38, No. 4 (July), pp. 544–57.
36.
OsborneDavidGaeblerTed. 1992. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector. New York: Plume.
37.
OsborneJason W.2000. “Advantages of Hierarchical Linear Modeling.”Practical Assessment Research and Evaluation (November-December), http://www.pareonline.net.
38.
OspinaSoniaYaroniAllan. 2003a. “Enacting Labor Management Cooperation: New Competencies and New Times.” In Brock and Lipsky 2003a, op. cit., pp. 137–70.
39.
OspinaSoniaYaroniAllan. 2003b. “Understanding Cooperative Behavior in Labor Management Cooperation: A Theory-Building Exercise.”Public Administration Review, Vol. 63, No. 4 (July/August), pp. 455–71.
40.
RaudenbushStephen W.BrykAnthony S., 2002. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
41.
RubinsteinSaul A.2000. “The Impact of Co-Management on Quality Performance: The Case of the Saturn Corporation.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 53, No. 2 (January), pp. 197–218.
42.
SuntrupEdward L.BarnumDarold T., 1997. “Reinventing the Federal Government: Forging New Labor-Management Partnerships for the 1990s.” In NissenBruce, ed., Unions and Workplace Reorganization. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, pp. 145–58.
43.
U.S. Department of Labor. 1996. Working Together for Public Service. Washington, D.C.: DoL, May.
44.
U.S. Office of Management and Budget. 2001. The President's Management Agenda. Washington, D.C.: OMB.
45.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management. 1998. National Partnership Council Update. December 7. Washington, D.C.: OPM.
46.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management2000. Labor-Management Partnership: A Report to the President. December. Washington, D.C.: OPM.
47.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management. 2002. Union Recognition in the Federal Government. Washington, D.C.: OPM.
48.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management. Undated. “The Organizational Assessment Survey.”Washington, D.C.: OPM.
49.
U.S. Social Security Administration. 1996. Evaluation of Partnership. Washington, D.C.: SSA.
50.
VermaAnilCutcher-GershenfeldJoel. 1996. “Workplace Innovations and System Change.” In Belman, eds., op. cit., pp. 201–42.
51.
VoosPaula. 1987. “Managerial Perceptions of the Economic Impact of Labor Relations Programs.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 40, No. 2 (January), pp. 195–208.
52.
VoosPaula. 1989. “The Influence of Cooperative Programs on Union-Management Relations, Flexibility, and Other Labor Relations Outcomes.”Journal of Labor Research, Vol. 10, No. 1 (Winter), pp. 103–17.
53.
WagarTerry H.1997. “Is Labor-Management Climate Important? Some Canadian Evidence.”Journal of Labor Research, Vol. 18, No. 1 (Winter), pp. 163–74.
