This comparison of labor-management relations at Deutsche Telekom (DT) and NTT Group (formerly Nippon Telephone and Telegraph) demonstrates the value of considering both institutions and strategic decision-making to understand the interaction between companies and unions. As corporations diversify, multi-divisional or holding company structures emerge, but the degree of diversity introduced in employment relations within the corporate group depends on the interaction between corporate strategy and the strategy of organized labor. The authors' field research, based on interviews with managers and labor leaders, shows that despite a broadly similar corporate strategy of diversification by DT and NTT after the liberalization of telecommunication markets, employment relations became more decentralized—both for unions and for works councils—within the DT group than within the NTT group. This difference in outcomes is explained by the relative power and strategic choices of labor and management, rather than by constraints and opportunities specific to the existing national institutions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArmstrongPeterMarginsonPaulEdwardsPaulPurcellJohn. 1998. “Divisionalization in the UK: Diversity, Size, and the Devolution of Bargaining.”Organization Studies, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 1–22.
2.
BiggartNicole W.1991. “Explaining East Asian Economic Development: Toward a Weberian Institutional Perspective.”Theory and Society, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 199–232.
3.
ChandlerAlfred D.1962. Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
4.
ChandlerAlfred D.1992. “What Is a Firm? A Historical Perspective.”European Economic Review, Vol. 36, No. 3 (April), pp. 483–92.
5.
CleggHugh A.1976. Trade Unionism under Collective Bargaining: A Theory Based on Comparisons of Six Countries. Oxford: Blackwell.
6.
CommonsJohn R.1909. “American Shoemakers, 1648–1895: A Sketch of Industrial Evolution.”Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 24, No. 1 (February), pp. 39–84.
7.
GranovetterMark. 1995. “Coase Revisited: Business Groups in the Modern Economy.”Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 93–130.
8.
HallPeterSoskiceDavid, eds. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
HerrigelGary. 1993. “Identity and Institutions: The Social Construction of Trade Unions in Nineteenth-Century Germany and the United States.”Studies in American Political Development, Vol. 7, pp. 371–94.
10.
HymanRichard. 1987. “Strategy or Structure? Capital, Labour, and Control.”Work, Employment and Society, Vol. 1, No. 1 (March), pp. 85–106.
11.
ItohHideshi. 2003. “Corporate Restructuring in Japan Part I: Can M-Form Organization Management Diverse Businesses?”Japanese Economic Review, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 49–73.
12.
JacksonGregory. 2005. “Contested Boundaries: Ambiguity and Creativity in the Evolution of German Codetermination.” In StreeckWolfgangThelenKathleen, eds., Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
JacobySanford M.2005. The Embedded Corporation: Corporate Governance and Employment Relations in Japan and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
14.
JIL. 1996. Denki Tsushin Sangyo no Roshi Kankei: Rekishi to Genjo (Industrial Relations in the Telecommunications Industry: History and Current State). Shiryo Series No. 65. Tokyo: Japan Institute of Labor.
15.
KagonoTadeoNonakaIkujiroSakakibaraKiyonoriOkumuraAkihiro. 1985. Strategic vs. Evolutionary Management: A U.S.-Japan Comparison of Strategy and Organization. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
16.
KalkowskiPeterHelmerMatthiasMicklerOtfried. 2001. Telekommunikation im Aufbruch. Wandel der Arbeitsstrukturen und Beschaeftig-ungsverhaeltnisse. Duesseldorf: Hans Boeckler Stiftung.
17.
KatzHarry C.1993. “The Decentralization of Collective Bargaining: A Literature Review and Comparative Analysis.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 47, No. 1 (October), pp. 3–22.
18.
KatzHarry C.1997. Telecommunications: Restructuring Work and Employment Relations Worldwide. Ithaca, N.Y.: ILR Press (an imprint of Cornell University Press).
19.
KatzHarry C.BattRosemaryKeefeJeffrey H., 2003. “The Revitalization of the CWA: Integrating Collective Bargaining, Political Action, and Organizing.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 56, No. 4 (July), pp. 573–89.
20.
KirchmaierThomas. 2003. “Corporate Restructuring and Firm Performance of British and German Non-Financial Firms.”Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics.
21.
KressCarl. 1997. “The 1996 Telekommunikationsgesetz and the 1996 Telecommunications Act: Toward More Competitive Markets in Telecommunications in Germany and the United States.”Federal Communications Law Journal, Vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 551ff.
22.
LamontMichèleMolnárVirág. 2002. “The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences.”Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 28, pp. 167–95.
23.
NelsonRichard R.1991. “Why Do Firms Differ, and How Does It Matter?”Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12, pp. 61–74.
24.
NWJ. 2002. NTT Roso Hossoku Iko no Undoo Furikaette (Looking back on the movement after the establishment of NTT Union). Tokyo: NTT Workers Union of Japan.
25.
PurcellJohnAhlstrandBruce. 1994. Human Resource Management in the Multi-Divisional Company. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
RosenowJoachimNascholdFrieder. 1994. Die Regulierung der Alternsgrenzen: Strategien von Unternehmen und Politik des Staates. Berlin: RIETI Discussion Paper Series.
27.
SakoMari. 1997. “Shunto: The Role of Employer and Union Coordination.” Chapter 10 in SakoM.SatoH., eds., Japanese Labour and Management in Transition. London: Routledge.
28.
SakoMari. 2006. Shifting Boundaries of the Firm: Japanese Company—Japanese Labour. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
SchmitterPhilippe C.StreeckWolfgang. 1999. “The Organization of Business Interests: Studying the Associative Action of Business in Advanced Industrial Societies.” Koeln, Germany: MPIfG Discussion Paper No. 99/1, Max-Planck-Instituet fuer Gesellschaftsforschung.
30.
StreeckWolfgang. 1987. “The Uncertainties of Management in the Management of Uncertainty: Employers, Labor Relations, and Industrial Adjustment in the 1980s.”Work, Employment and Society, Vol. 1, pp. 281–308.
31.
StreeckWolfgang. 1993. “Klasse, Beruf, Unternehmen, Distrikt: Organizationsgrundlagen industrieller Beziehungen im Europaeischen Binnenmarkt.” In StruempelBurkhartDierkesMeinolf, eds., Innovation und Beharrung in der Arbeitspolitik. Stuttgart: Schaeffer-Poeschel Verlag, pp. 39–68.
32.
StreeckWolfgangThelenKathleen, eds. 2005. Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33.
StreeckWolfgangVisserJelle. 1998. “An Evolutionary Dynamic of Trade Union Systems.” MPIfG Discussion Paper 98/4.
34.
ThelenKathleenKumeIkuo. 2003. “The Future of Nationally Embedded Capitalism: Industrial Relations in Germany and Japan.” In YamamuraKozoStreeckWolfgang, eds., The End of Diversity? Prospects for German and Japanese Capitalism, pp. 183–211.
35.
TillyCharles. 2004. “Social Boundary Mechanisms.”Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Vol. 34, No. 2 (June), pp. 211–36.
36.
UlmanLloyd. 1955. The Rise of the National Trade Union. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
37.
UndyR.EllisV.McCarthyW. E. J.HalmosA. M., 1981. Change in Trade Unions: The Development of UK Unions Since the 1960s. London: Hutchinson.
38.
UndyRogerFoshPatriciaMorrisHuwSmithPaulMartinRoderick, eds. 1996. Managing the Unions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
39.
WhitleyRichard. 1999. Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40.
WhittingtomRichardMayerMichaelCurtoFrancerso. 1999. “Chandlerism in Post-War Europe: France, Germany, and the UK, 1950–1993.”Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 519–50.
41.
YamamuraKozoStreeckWolfgang. 2003. The End of Diversity ? The Prospects for German and Japanese Capitalism. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
42.
YoshiharaYasunori. 2000. “Kigyo no Gurupuka to Roshi Kankei: NTT Roso no Jirei wo Tsujita Kosatsu” (Corporate Groupings and Labor-Management Relations: Thoughts Based on the NTT Union Case). Nihon Rodo Kenkyu Zasshi (JIL Journal), No. 484 (November), pp. 71–79.
43.
Zendentsu. 1997. NTT Keiei Keitai Mondai to Zendentsu no Torikumi: Bunri Bunkatsu Hantai Undo Shoushi (The Problem of NTT's Management Pattern and How Zendentsu Tackled it: A Short History of the Movement to Oppose Divestiture). Tokyo: Zendentsu.
