Researchers using the 1988–96 General Social Survey (GSS) have found that behaviorally gay/bisexual men earn 15–30% less, and behaviorally lesbian/bisexual women earn 20–30% more, than similar heterosexuals. This study uses confidential data on self-reported sexual orientation for 50,000 adults in California in 2001, providing more than five times as many respondents who identify themselves as sexual minorities as does the GSS. Previous approaches are extended by using more complete data on earnings, work effort, and job characteristics. Apart from the well-documented marriage premium, the author finds no statistically or economically significant independent effect of a gay or lesbian sexual orientation on earnings. There is some evidence that bisexual men and women earn less than heterosexuals. Analysis of more recent GSS data (including data from 1998–2000) suggests the findings of previous studies are somewhat sensitive to the time period considered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllegrettoSylviaArthurMichelle. 2001. “An Empirical Analysis of Homosexual/Heterosexual Male Earnings Differentials: Unmarried and Unequal?”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 54, No. 3 (April), pp. 631–46.
2.
BadgettM. V. Lee. 1995. “The Wage Effects of Sexual Orientation Discrimination.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 48, No. 4 (July), pp. 726–39.
3.
BadgettM. V. Lee. 1997. “Beyond Biased Samples: Challenging the Myths on the Economic Status of Lesbians and Gay Men.” In GluckmanAmyReedBetsy, eds., HomoEconomics: Capitalism, Community, and Lesbian and Gay Life. New York: Rutledge, pp. 65–71.
4.
BadgettM. V. Lee. 2001. Money, Myths, and Change: The Economic Lives of Lesbians and Gay Men. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
BadgettM. V.KingM., 1997. “Occupational Strategies of Lesbians and Gay Men.” In GluckmanAmyReedBetsy, eds., HomoEconomics: Capitalism, Community and Lesbian and Gay Life. New York: Routledge, pp. 73–86.
6.
BeckerGary. 1991. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
7.
BeckerGary. 1993. Human Capital, 3rd Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
BergNathanLienDonald. 2002. “Measuring the Effect of Sexual Orientation on Income: Evidence of Discrimination?”Contemporary Economic Policy, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 394–414.
9.
BlackDanGatesGarySandersSethTaylorLowell. 2000. “Demographics of the Gay and Lesbian Population in the United States: Evidence from Available Systematic Data Sources.”Demography, Vol. 37, No. 2 (May), pp. 139–54.
10.
BlackDanGatesGarySandersSethTaylorLowell. 2002. “Why do Gay Men Live in San Francisco?”Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 51, No. 1 (July), pp. 54–76.
11.
BlackDanMakarHodaSandersSethTaylorLowell. 2000. “The Effects of Sexual Orientation on Earnings.” Working paper, Syracuse University.
12.
BlackDanMakarHodaSandersSethTaylorLowell. 2003. “The Earnings Effects of Sexual Orientation.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 56, No. 3 (April), pp. 449–69.
13.
BlandfordJohn. 2000. “Evidence on the Role of Sexual Orientation in the Determination of Earnings Outcomes.” Working paper, University of Chicago.
14.
BlandfordJohn. 2003. “The Nexus of Sexual Orientation and Gender in the Determination of Earnings.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 56, No. 4 (July), pp. 622–42.
15.
CarpenterChristopher. 2004. “New Evidence on Gay and Lesbian Household Incomes.”Contemporary Economic Policy, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 78–94.
16.
ClainSuzanne HellerLeppelKaren. 2001. “An Investigation into Sexual Orientation Discrimination as an Explanation for Wage Differences.”Applied Economics, Vol. 33, pp. 37–47.
17.
GintherD.ZavodnyMadeline. 2001. “Is the Male Marriage Premium Due to Selection? The Effect of Shotgun Weddings on the Return to Marriage.”Journal of Population Economics, No. 14, pp. 313–28.
18.
HewittChristopher. 1998. “Homosexual Demography: Implications for the Spread of AIDS.”Journal of Sex Research, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 390–96.
19.
JepsenLisa K.JepsenChristopher A., 2002. “An Empirical Analysis of the Matching Patterns of Same-Sex and Opposite Sex Couples.”Demography, Vol. 39, No. 3 (August), pp. 435–53.
20.
KlawitterMarieka. 1998. “The Determinants of Earnings for Women in Same-Sex and Different-Sex Couples.” Unpublished working paper, Graduate School of Public Affairs, University of Washington.
21.
KlawitterMariekaFlattVictor. 1998. “The Effects of State and Local Antidiscrimination Policies on Earnings for Gays and Lesbians.”Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Vol. 17, No. 4 (Fall), pp. 658–86.
22.
KorenmanSandersNeumarkDavid. 1991. “Does Marriage Really Make Men More Productive?”Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 26, No. 2 (Spring), pp. 282–307.
23.
LaumannEdwardGagnonJohnMichaelRobertMichaelsStuart. 1994. The Social Organization of Sexuality: Sexual Practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
