This paper examines the changing nature of attitudes toward and reports of sexual harassment using data for 1978–94 drawn from the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (USMSPB) of the U.S. federal government. The authors find that although unwanted sexual behavior reported by federal government employees changed only slightly in overall incidence over the period, its pattern changed noticeably. Unwanted sexual attention by supervisors, for example, declined in incidence; crude and offensive behavior by co-workers increased; and the likelihood that harassment would occur only once (rather than repeatedly) increased. Employees' attitudes toward sexual harassment changed markedly, with a dramatically increased willingness to define unwanted sexual behavior as sexual harassment. This trend appears to have been due not to changes in employees' demographic, human capital, and job characteristics, but rather to structural changes in their views of what constitutes sexual harassment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AntecolHeatherCobb-ClarkDeborah. 2001. “Men, Women, and Sexual Harassment in the U.S. Military.”Gender Issues, Vol. 19, No. 1 (Winter), pp. 3–18.
2.
AntecolHeatherCobb-ClarkDeborah. 2002. “Sexual Harassment of Female Active-Duty Personnel: The Effect on Job Satisfaction and Intentions to Remain in the Military.” IZA Discussion Paper, No. 379.
3.
AntecolHeatherCobb-ClarkDeborah. 2003. “Does Sexual Harassment Training Change Attitudes? A View from the Federal Level.”Social Science Quarterly, Vol. 84, No. 4 (December), pp. 826–42.
4.
BasuKaushik. 2002. “Sexual Harassment in the Workplace: An Economic Analysis with Implications for Worker Rights and Labor Standards Policy.” Unpublished paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
5.
BinghamShereen G.SchererLisa L., 2001. “The Unexpected Effects of a Sexual Harassment Educational Program.”Journal of Applied Behaviorial Science, Vol. 37, No. 2 (June), pp. 125–53.
6.
DoironDenise J.RiddellW. Craig. 1994. “The Impact of Unionization on Male-Female Earnings Differences in Canada.”Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 29, No. 2 (Spring), pp. 504–34.
7.
FitzgeraldLouise F.DrasgowFritzHulinCharles L.GelfandMichele J.MagleyVicki J., 1997. “Antecedents and Consequence of Sexual Harassment in Organizations: A Test of an Integrated Model.”Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 82, No. 3 (August), pp. 578–89.
8.
FitzgeraldLouise F.DrasgowFritzMagleyVicki J., 1999b. “Sexual Harassment in the Armed Forces: A Test of an Integrated Model.”Military Psychology, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 329–43.
9.
FitzgeraldLouise F.MagleyVicki J.DrasgowFritzWaldoCraig R., 1999a. “Measuring Sexual Harassment in the Military: The Sexual Experiences Questionnaire (SEQ-DoD).”Military Psychology, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 247–63.
10.
FitzgeraldLouise F.OrmerodAlayne J., 1993. “Breaking Silence: The Sexual Harassment of Women in Academia and the Workplace.” In DenmarkFlorence L.PaludiMichele A., eds., Psychology of Women: A Handbook of Issues and Theories. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, pp. 553–82.
11.
FitzgeraldLouise F.ShullmanS. L., 1993. “Sexual Harassment: A Research Analysis and Agenda for the 1990s.”Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 42, No. 1 (February), pp. 5–27.
12.
FoulisDanielleMcCabeMarita. 1997. “Sexual Harassment: Factors Affecting Attitudes and Perceptions.”Sex Roles, Vol. 37, No. 9/10 (November), pp. 773–98.
13.
International Labour Office (ILO). 1992. “Combating Sexual Harassment at Work.”Conditions of Work Digest, Vol. 11, No. 1, Geneva.
14.
JohnsonHolly. 1994. “Work-Related Sexual Harassment.”Perspectives, Statistics Canada, Catalogue, 75–001E (Winter), pp. 9–12.
15.
LabandDavid N.LentzBernard F., 1998. “The Effects of Sexual Harassment on Job Satisfaction, Earnings, and Turnover among Female Lawyers.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 51, No. 4 (July), pp. 594–607.
16.
LeonardJonathan S.1990. “The Impact of Affirmative Action Regulation and Equal Employment Law on Black Employment.”Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 4, No. 4 (Autumn), pp. 47–63.
17.
LewisGregory B.1996. “Gender Integration of Occupations in the Federal Civil Service: Extent and Effects on Male-Female Earnings.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 49, No. 3 (April), pp. 472–83.
18.
MagleyVicki J.HulinCharles L.FitzgeraldLouise F.DeNardoMary. 1999. “Outcomes of Self-Labeling Sexual Harassment.”Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 84, No. 3 (June), pp. 390–402.
19.
MarinAmy J.GuadagnoRosanna E., 1999. “Perceptions of Sexual Harassment Victims as a Function of Labeling and Reporting.”Sex Roles, Vol. 41, No. 11/12 (December), pp. 921–40.
20.
PriorJohn B.FitnessJulieHutzClaudioKumpfMartinLubbertKarinPesonenOutiErberMaureen Wang. 1997. “Gender Differences in the Interpretation of Social-Sexual Behavior: A Cross-Cultural Perspective on Sexual Harassment.”Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Vol. 28, No. 5 (September), pp. 509–34.
21.
RoscoeB.StrouseJ. S.GoodwinM. P., 1994. “Sexual Harassment: Early Adolescents' Self-Reports of Experiences and Acceptance.”Adolescence, Vol. 29, No. 115 (Fall), pp. 515–23.
22.
SchneiderKimberly T.SwanSuzanneFitzgeraldLouise F., 1997. “Job-Related and Psychological Effects of Sexual Harassment in the Workplace: Empirical Evidence from Two Organizations.”Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 82, No. 3 (August), pp. 401–515.
23.
U.S. Bureau of the Census, Department of Commerce. 1980. Statistical Abstract of the United States: National Databook and Guide to Sources, 101st Edition. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
24.
U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (USMSPB). 1981. Sexual Harassment in the Federal Workplace: Is It a Problem?Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
25.
U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (USMSPB). 1988. Sexual Harassment in the Federal Workplace: An Update. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
26.
U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (USMSPB). 1995. Sexual Harassment in the Federal Workplace: Trends, Progress, Continuing Challenges. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
27.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management (USOPM). 1999. The Fact Book, 1999 Edition, Federal Civilian Work Force Statistics. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, September.
28.
WilliamsJill HunterFitzgeraldLouise F.DrasgowFritz. 1999. “The Effects of Organizational Practices on Sexual Harassment and Individual Outcomes in the Military.”Military Psychology, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 303–28.
