Labor-force withdrawal programs such as government-subsidized early retirement programs are an important unemployment policy instrument in some European countries. Most economists, however, have expressed doubts concerning these programs' efficacy in combating unemployment, in part because they cause a reduction in effective labor supply, which in turn places undue upward pressure on the wage level. This paper analyzes the wage pressure effects of the early retirement program in France in 1984–86. In contrast to most existing studies of such programs, which have analyzed aggregate labor markets based on the country as the unit of observation, the empirical analysis in this paper employs a partial equilibrium framework and uses less aggregated, sectoral data. The findings suggest, consistent with results from most of the aggregate labor market studies, that the early retirement program had a slight positive impact on wage pressure.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbowdJohnAllainLaurence. 1996. “Compensation Structure and Product Market Competition.”Annates d Économie et de Statistique, Vols. 41–42 (January/June), pp. 207–18.
2.
AbowdJohnKramarzFrancis. 1993. “A Test of Negotiation and Incentive Compensation Models Using Longitudinal French Enterprise Data.” In van OursJan C.PfannG. A.RidderGeert, eds., Lqabour Demand and Equilibrium Wage Formation. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
3.
AbowdJohnKramarzFrancis. 1996. “Les Politiques Salariales: Individus et Entreprises.”Revue Économique, No. 3, pp. 611–22.
4.
AbowdJohnKramarzFrancisMargolisDavid. 1999. “High Wage Workers and High Wage Firms.”Econometrica, Vol. 67 (March), pp. 251–333.
5.
AbowdJohnLemieuxThomas. 1993. “The Effects of Product Market Competition on Collective Bargaining Agreements: The Case of Foreign Competition in Canada.”Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 108 (November), pp. 983–1014.
6.
AllenSteven G.1995. “Updated Notes on the Interindustry Wage Structure, 1890–1990.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 48, No. 2 (January), pp. 305–21.
7.
BellLindaFreemanRichard B., 1991. “The Causes of Increasing Interindustry Wage Dispersion in the United States.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 44, No. 2 (January), pp. 275–87.
8.
BenvenisteCorinneHernuPatrice. 1987. “Les Salaires en 1986.”Économie et Statistique, No. 199, pp. 7–23.
9.
BlanchardPierreSevestrePatrick. 1989. “LTndexation des Salaires: Quelle Rupture en 1982?—Une Analyse à Partir de Données de Conventions Collectives de Branches.”Économie et Prévision, Vol. 87 (Winter), pp. 67–74.
10.
BlanchflowerDavidOswaldAndrew J.SanfeyPeter. 1996. “Wages, Profits, and Rent-Sharing.”Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 111, No. 1 (February), pp. 227–51.
11.
BlankRebecca. 2000. “Fighting Poverty: Lessons from Recent U.S. History.”Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 14, No. 1 (Winter), pp. 3–19.
12.
Bloch-LondonCatherineBoisardPierreBoulinJean-YvesCoutrotThomas. 1994a. “Les Processus Locaux de ‘Partage du Travail.’”Travail et Emploi, No. 59 (April), pp. 4–17.
13.
Bloch-LondonCatherineBoisardPierreBoulinJean-YvesCoutrotThomas. 1994b. “Les Expériences d'Ajustement des Salaires et de ‘Partage du Travail.’”Premières Synthèses. DARES, Ministère du Travail, No. 43 (November), pp. 1–7.
14.
BrownJames N.AshenfelterOrley. 1986. “Testing the Efficiency of Employment Contracts.”Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 94, No. 3 (June), pp. S40–S87.
15.
CotisJean-PhilippeLoufirAbderrahim. 1990. “Formation des Salaires, Chômage d‘Équilibre’, et Incidence des Cotisations sur le Coût du Travail.”Économie et Prévision, Vol. 92–93 (Winter/Spring), pp. 97–110.
16.
DecressinJörgFatásAntonio. 1995. “Regional Labor Market Dynamics in Europe.”European Economic Review, Vol. 39, No. 9 (December), pp. 1627–55.
17.
DickensWilliam T.1990. “Error Components in Grouped Data—Is It Ever Worth Weighting?”Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 72, No. 2 (May), pp. 328–33.
18.
DormontBrigittele DemJean. 1990. “La Dimension Sectorielle de la Formation des Salaires: Une Analyse Comparative des Industries Américaines, Allemandes, et Françaises.”Économie et Prévision, Vol. 92–93 (Winter/Spring), pp. 145–52.
19.
FreemanRichard B.KatzLawrence F., 1988. “Industrial Wage and Employment Determination in an Open Economy.” In AbowdJohnFreemanRichard, eds., Immigration, Trade, and the Labor Market. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 235–59.
20.
FriezAdrienJulhèsMartine. 1998. Séries Longues sur les Salaires, Édition 1988 INSEE Résultats Division Emploi-Revenus, No. 136.
21.
GlaudeMichelHernuPatrice. 1986. “Les Salaires en 1985.”Économie et Statistique, No. 188, pp. 3–22.
22.
GrayDavid M.1995. “All Displaced Workers Are Not Created Equal: The Political Economy of Worker Adjustment Assistance in France.”Public Choice, Vol. 85, Nos. 3–4 (December), pp. 313–33.
23.
HernuPatrice. 1985. “Les Salaires en 1984: Une Vue Synthetique.”Économie et Statistique, No. 178, pp. 29–41.
24.
HolmlundBertilZetterbergJ., 1991. “Insider Effects in Wage Determination: Evidence from Five Countries.”European Economic Review, Vol. 35, No. 5 (July), pp. 1009–34.
25.
HuntJennifer. 1996. “The Response of Wages and Actual Hours Worked to the Reduction of Standard Hours in Germany.” NBER Working Paper 5716.
26.
HuntJennifer. 1999. “Has Work-Sharing Worked in Germany?”Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 114, No. 1 (February), pp. 117–48.
KatzHarry. 1993. “The Decentralization of Collective Bargaining: A Literature Review and Comparative Analysis.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 47, No. 1 (October), pp. 3–22.
29.
LayardRichardNickellStephenJackmanRichard. 1991. Unemployment: Macroeconomic Performance and the Labour Market. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
LoufirRahimMalgrangePierre. 1996. “Une Étude Comparative des Comportements Salariaux en Allemagne, en France, et aux États-Unis.” CEPREMAP cahier de recherche No. 9621.
31.
OECD. 1995. The Labour Market and Older Workers. Social Policy Studies No. 17. Paris: The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
32.
Saint-PaulGilles. 1996. “Exploring the Political Economy of Labour Market Institutions.”Economic Policy: A European Forum, Vol. 23 (October), pp. 265–300.
