Using data from surveys, interviews, direct observation, and records of quality performance, the author examines the system of co-management created through the General Motors-United Auto Workers partnership at the Saturn Corporation. Under this partnership, each department, or module, is jointly managed by union-represented and non-represented advisors. The author credits the union with building a dense communications network throughout Saturn's management system. Compared to non-represented advisors, union advisors showed greater levels of lateral communication and coordination, which had a significant positive impact on quality performance. Also positively associated with quality outcomes at the module level were balanced time use, with each advisor engaging in both production and people management, and alignment between union-represented and non-represented advisors regarding their priorities, responsibilities, practices, and job definition.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AokiMasahiko. 1988. Information, Incentives, and Bargaining in the Japanese Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
2.
AokiMasahiko. 1990. “Toward an Economic Model of the Japanese Firm.”Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 27, No. 1 (March), pp. 1–27.
3.
BakerWayne. 1992. “The Network Organization in Theory and Practice.” In NohriaNitin and EcclesRobert, eds., Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.
ColeRobert E.1979. Work, Mobility, and Participation: A Comparative Study of Japanese and American Industry. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
CookeWilliam N.1990. Labor-Management Cooperation: New Partnerships or Going in Circles?Kalamazoo, Mich.: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
7.
CookeWilliam N.1992. “Product Quality Improvement through Employee Participation: The Effects of Unionization and Joint Union-Management Administration.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 46, No. 1 (October), pp. 119–34.
8.
Cutcher-GershenfeldJoel. 1987. “Xerox and the ACTWU: Tracing a Transformation in Industrial Relations.” In FoulkesFred K. and LivernashE. Robert, eds., Human Resources Management, 2nd edition. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
9.
DavisLouis, and ChernsAlbert, eds. 1975. The Quality of Working Life: Problems, Prospects, and the State of the Art, Vol. 1. New York: Free Press.
10.
DavisLouis E., and TaylorJames C., eds. 1979. Design of Jobs. Santa Monica, Calif.: Goodyear.
11.
DertouzosMichaelSolowRobert, and LesterRichard. 1989. Made in America. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
12.
EatonAdrienne, and VoosPaula. 1994. “Productivity Enhancing Innovations in Work Organization, Compensation, and Employee Participation in the Union vs. Non-Union Sectors.”Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations, Vol. 6. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.
13.
FreemanRichard B., and MedoffJames L.. 1984. What Do Unions Do?New York: Basic Books.
14.
GeorgeVarghese, and AllenThomas. 1993. “Relational Data in Organizational Settings: An Introductory Note for Using AGNI and Netgraphs to Analyze Nodes, Relationships, Partitions, and Boundaries.” Working Paper 85–93, International Center for Research on the Management of Technology, MIT.
15.
GittellJody Hoffer. 1996. “Paradox of Coordination and Control.” Working Paper, Harvard Business School.
16.
GoldenClinton S., and ParkerVirginia. 1949. Causes of Industrial Peace under Collective Bargaining. New York: Harper & Bros.
17.
GoldenClinton S., and RuttenbergHarold. 1942. Dynamics of Industrial Democracy. New York: Harper & Bros.
18.
GranovetterMark. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.”American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 78, No. 6 (May), pp. 1360–80.
19.
GranovetterMark. 1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.”American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 91, No. 3 (November), pp. 481–510.
20.
GranovetterMark. 1992. “Problems of Explanation in Economic Sociology.” In NohriaNitin and EcclesRobert, eds., Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
21.
GuestRobert. 1979. “Quality of Work Life—Learning from Tarrytown.”Harvard Business Review, No. 4 (July–August), pp. 76–87.
22.
HayesRobert H.WheelwrightSteven C., and ClarkKim B.. 1988. Dynamic Manufacturing: Creating the Learning Organization. New York: Free Press.
23.
HeckscherCharles. 1988. The New Unionism: Employee Involvement in the Changing Corporation. New York: Basic Books.
24.
HoerrJohn P.1988. And the Wolf Finally Came: The Decline of the American Steel Industry. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
25.
IchniowskiCaseyKochanThomasLevineDavidOlsonCraig, and StraussGeorge. 1996. “What Works at Work: Overview and Assessment.”Industrial Relations, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 299–333.
26.
IshikawaKaoru. 1985. Total Quality Control: The Japanese Way. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
27.
J.D. Power & Associates. 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998. Customer Satisfaction Index. Agoura Hills, Calif.
28.
Japan Iron and Steel Federation. 1982. A Summary of the Role of Foreman in the Japanese Steel Industry. Tokyo.
29.
KatzHarry. 1985. Shifting Gears: Changing Labor Relations in the U.S. Auto Industry. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
30.
KnokeDavid, and KuklinskiJames H.. 1982. Network Analysis. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.
31.
KochanThomasKatzHarry, and McKersieRobert. 1986. The Transformation of American Industrial Relations. New York: Basic Books.
32.
KrackhardtDavid, and BrassDaniel J.. 1994. “Intraorganizational Networks: The Micro Side.” In Wasserman and Galaskiewicz, eds., Advances in Social Network Analysis. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.
33.
LeeBarbara. 1987. “The Ethicon (Johnson and Johnson)/ACTWU Work Involvement Process.” Bureau of Labor-Management Cooperation, U.S. Department of Labor. Washington, D.C.: GPO.
34.
LevineDavid, and TysonLaura D'Andrea. 1990. “Participation, Productivity, and the Firm's Environment.” In BlinderAlan S., ed., Paying for Productivity. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
35.
LockeRichard. 1992. “The Demise of the National Union in Italy: Lessons for Comparative Industrial Relations Theory.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 45, No. 2 (January), pp. 229–49.
36.
MacDuffieJohn Paul. 1995. “Human Resource Bundles and Manufacturing Performance: Organizational Logic and Flexible Production Systems in the World Auto Industry.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 48, No. 2 (January), pp. 197–221.
37.
MacDuffieJohn Paul, and KrafcikJohn. 1992. “Integrating Technology and Human Resources for High Performance Manufacturing: Evidence from the International Auto Industry.” In KochanThomas and UseemMicheal, eds., Transforming Organizations. New York: Oxford University Press.
38.
McGregorDouglas. 1960. The Human Side of Enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.
39.
Memorandum of Agreement. 1985. Saturn Corporation.
PioreMichael J., and SabelCharles F.. 1984. The Second Industrial Divide. New York: Basic Books.
42.
RubinsteinSaul A.1996. “Saturn, the GM/UAW Partnership: The Impact of Co-Management and Joint Governance on Firm and Local Union Performance.” Diss., MIT.
43.
RubinsteinSaulBennettMichael, and KochanThomas. 1993. “The Saturn Partnership: Co-Management and the Reinvention of the Local Union.” In KaufmanBruce and KleinerMorris, eds., Employee Representation: Alternatives and Future Directions. Madison, Wis.: IRRA Press.
44.
ShimadaHaruo, and MacDuffieJohn Paul. 1986. “Industrial Relations and Humanware.” Working Paper, Sloan School of Management, MIT.
45.
SlichterSumner. 1941. Union Policies and Industrial Management. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
46.
SlichterSumnerHealyJames J., and LivernashRobert E.. 1960. The Impact of Collective Bargaining on Management. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
47.
SuzakiKiyoshi. 1987. The New Manufacturing Challenge. New York: Free Press.
48.
TristEric. 1981. “The Evolution of Socio-Technical Systems: A Conceptual Framework.” In Van de VenAndy and JoyceWilliam, eds., Perspectives on Organizational Design and Behaviour. New York: Wiley Interscience.
49.
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor-Management Cooperation. 1982. “Labor-Management Cooperation: Recent Efforts and Results.”Washington, D.C.: GPO.
50.
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor-Management Cooperation. 1987. “New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc., and the United Automobile Workers.”Washington, D.C.: GPO.
51.
WalkerMichael E.WassermanStanley, and WellmanBarry. 1994. “Statistical Models for Social Support Networks.” In Wasserman and Galaskiewicz, eds., Advances in Social Network Analysis. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.
52.
WaltonRichardCutcher-GershenfeldJoel, and McKersieRobert B.. 1994. Strategic Negotiations: A Theory of Change in Labor-Management Relations. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
53.
WaltonRichard E., and McKersieRobert B.. 1965. A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations: An Analysis of a Social Interaction System. Ithaca, N.Y.: ILR Press.
54.
WeverKirsten. 1989. “Toward a Structural Account of Union Participation in Management: The Case of Western Airlines.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 42, No. 4 (July), pp. 600–609.
55.
WilmsWellford W.1996. Restoring Prosperity. New York: Random House.
56.
WomackJamesJonesDaniel, and RoosDaniel. 1990. The Machine That Changed the World. New York: Rawson.
