This research article investigates stakeholder-led eco-activism initiatives in Bengaluru, focusing on waste-related issues and lake conservation efforts. Using a mixed-method approach with primary and secondary data sources, the study focuses on the city’s multifaceted landscape of environmental problem-solving. Through interviews, discussions and data analysis, the article explores the roles and contributions of various stakeholders, including citizen groups, NGOs and governmental bodies, in addressing these critical environmental challenges. Using primary and secondary data, the study provides insights into the strategies, challenges and impacts of stakeholder-led initiatives to mitigate environmental issues. Further, this research sheds light on the collaborative efforts of stakeholders and their pivotal role in driving environmental sustainability in Bengaluru.
BandyopadhyayJ. (1992). Sustainability and survival in the mountain context. Ambio, 21(4), 297–302.
2.
BPAC. (2021, November27). A dive into Bengaluru’s lakes. Bengaluru Political Action Committee. https://bpac.in/a-dive-into-bengalurus-lakes/
3.
Centre for Sustainable Development (CSD). (2012). Environmental report card of Bangalore.
4.
ChatterjeeS. (2018, October27). Save Bellandur: Bengaluru residents form human chain to protest civic apathy. The News Minute. https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/save-bellandur-bengaluru-residents-form-human-chain-protest-civic-apathy-90667
5.
DoversS. (2013). The Australian environmental policy agenda. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 72(2), 114–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12013
6.
ESG. (2012, November24). Karnataka High Court directs Bangalore to be the first city in India to segregate waste at source; Directs decentralised management of waste to facilitate composting and recycling. Environment Support Group. http://www.esgindia.org/education/teaching-resources/press/karnataka-high-court-directs-bangalore-b.html
7.
HuttonD., & ConnorsL. (1999). History of the Australian environment movement. Cambridge University Press.
8.
JenkinsJ.C. (1983). Resource mobilization theory and the study of social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 9, 527–553.
9.
KaranP.P. (1994). Environmental movements in India. Geographical Review, 84, 32–41.
10.
KousisM. (1999). Sustaining local environmental mobilisations: Groups, actions and claims in Southern Europe. Environmental Politics, 8(1), 172–198.
11.
KuD.W. (1996). The structural change of the Korean environmental movement. Korea Journal of Population and Development, 25(1), 155–180.
12.
KuzmiakD.T. (1991). The American environmental movement. Geographical Journal, 157(3), 265–278.
13.
LutringerC., & RanderiaS. (2017). Garbage is good to think with: The interplay of civic activism and judicial intervention in shaping Bangalore’s solid waste management policies. International Development Policy | Revue internationale de politique de développement, 8.2. https://doi.org/10.4000/poldev.2486
14.
MaitiS., & AgrawalP.K. (2005). Environmental degradation in the context of growing urbanization: A focus on the metropolitan cities of India. Journal of Human Ecology, 17(4), 277–287.
15.
MirA.H., & UpadhayaK. (2016). Community based forest management in India. Biodiversity and Environmental Conservation, Discovery Publishing House, New Delhi, India, 167–184.
16.
NabhiU.S. (2006). Environmental movements in India: An assessment of their impact on state and non-state actors. India Quarterly, 62(1), 123–145.
17.
PakulskiJ., TranterB., & CrookS. (1998). The dynamics of environmental issues in Australia: Concerns, clusters and carriers. Australian Journal of Political Science, 33(2), 235–252.
18.
ParanjpyeV. (1990). High dams on the Narmada: A holistic analysis of the river valley projects. Indian National Trust for Art and Cultural Heritage.
19.
PartelowS., WinklerK.J., & ThalerG.M. (2020). Environmental non-governmental organizations and global environmental discourse. PLOS One, 15(5), e0232945. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232945
20.
PhillipsA.S., HungY.T., & BoselaP.A. (2007). Love canal tragedy. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 21(4), 313–319.
21.
RannikkoP. (1996). Local environmental conflicts and the change in environmental consciousness. Acta Sociologica, 39(1), 57–72.
22.
RootesC., & NulmanE. (2015). The impacts of environmental movements. In DianiM. & PortaD.D. (Eds), Oxford handbook of social movements (pp. 729–742). Oxford University Press.
23.
SilveiraS.J. (2000). The American environmental movement: Surviving through diversity. Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, 28, 497–532.
24.
SridharK.S., & KumarS. (2013). India’s urban environment: Air/water pollution and pollution abatement. Economic and Political Weekly, 48(6), 22–25.
25.
SwainA. (1997). Democratic consolidation? Environmental movements in India. Asian Survey, 37(9), 818–832.
