This article attempts to understand how and why deviant behaviour emerges among executive-grade officers in Sri Lanka. This qualitative research includes open-ended interviews with eight executive-grade officers in the government sector. The thematic data analysis of the interviews revealed several factors that influence deviant behaviour among them. These include individual characteristics, attitudes, social norms, organisational culture, unawareness of rules, lack of procedural improvements, misuse of power and authority. The article explores practical implications, how procedural improvements should be implemented and ethical education should promote self-discipline, proper monitoring mechanisms and transparency through the Right to Information Act (2016).
AguileraR., RuppD., WilliamsC., & GanapathiJ. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations’. The Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836–863.
2.
AliasM., RasdiR., IsmailM., & SamahB. (2013). Predictors of workplace deviant behaviour: HRD agenda for Malaysian support personnel. European Journal of Training and Development, 37(2), 161–182.
3.
AppelbaumS., LaconiG., & MatousekA. (2007). Positive and negative deviant workplace behaviours: Causes, impacts, and solutions. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 7(5), 586–598.
4.
AyalS., GinoF., BarkanR., & ArielyD. (2015). Three principles to REVISE people’s unethical behaviour. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(6), 738–741.
5.
BennetR., & RobinsonS. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace ’deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 349–360.
6.
BennetR., & MarasiS. (2016). Workplace deviance. In FriedmanH. S. (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of mental health (pp. 382–386). Academic Press.
7.
BraunV., & ClarkeV. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners (1st ed.). Sage Publications.
8.
CarvalhoW. (2011) Attitudes towards unethical behaviours in organisational settings: An empirical study. Ethics in Progress, 2(2), 9–22.
9.
DetertJ., TreviñoL., BurrisE., & AndiappanM. (2007). Managerial modes of influence and counter-productivity in organisations: A longitudinal business-unit-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 993.
10.
DowneJ., CowellR., & MorganK. (2016). What determines ethical behaviour in public organizations: Is it rules or leadership?Public Administration Review, 76(6), 898–909.
11.
DuttaB., MadalliD., TangarajaG., RasdiR., IsmailM., & SamahB. (2015). Fostering knowledge sharing behaviour among public sector managers: A proposed model for the Malaysian public service. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(1),121–140.
12.
GalperinB. (2012). Exploring the nomological network of workplace deviance: Developing and validating a measure of constructive deviance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(12), 2988–3025.
13.
Graham-MooreB. (1986). Reviewed work: Absenteeism: New approaches to understanding, measuring, and managing employee absence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(2), 329–331.
14.
GreenbergJ. (1990). Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(5), 561–570.
15.
GuoW., SunS., & DaiR. (2018). Guanxi deviant behaviour in the Chinese cultural context. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management. An International Journal, 13(2), 162–182.
16.
HoqueZ., SiddiqueeN., & HopperT. (1994). Managing organisations in the Third World: A case study of management. Public Administration & Development, 14(5), 421–437.
17.
JonesT. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organisations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395.
18.
KodagodaT. (2010). How do professionals and managers combine mothering with employment? Western theories in the Sri Lankan experience. International Journal of Management Practice, 4(2), 169–181.
19.
KongD. T., HoV. T., & GargS. (2020). Employee and coworker idiosyncratic deals: Implications for emotional exhaustion and deviant behaviours. Journal of Business Ethics, 164, 593–609.
20.
LewisP. (1985). Defining ‘business ethics’: Like nailing jello to a wall. Journal of Business Ethics, 4(1), 377–383.
21.
LiyanagamageN., FernandoM., & GibbonsB. (2022). The emotional Machiavellian: interactions between leaders and employees. Journal of Business Ethics, 186, 657–673.
22.
MartinkoM. J., GundlachM. J., & DouglasS. C. (2002). Toward an integrative theory of counterproductive workplace behaviour: A causal reasoning perspective. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10(1–2), 36–50.
23.
MayerD., KuenziM., & GreenbaumR. (2010). Examining the link between ethical leadership and employee misconduct: The mediating role of ethical climate. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(1), 7–16.
24.
MooreC., DetertJ., KlebeL., TreviñoV., BakerL., & MayerD. (2012). Why employees do bad things: Moral disengagement and unethical organisational behaviour. Personnel Psychology, 65(1), 1–48.
25.
NasirM., & BashirA. (2012). Examining workplace deviance in public sector organisations of Pakistan. International Journal of Social Economics, 39(4), 240–253.
26.
ParkH., HooblerJ. M., WuJ., LidenR. C., HuJ., & WilsonM. S. (2019). Abusive supervision and employee deviance: A multifoci justice perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 158, 1113–1131.
27.
PatersonT., & HuangL. (2019). Am I expected to be ethical? A role-definition perspective of ethical leadership and unethical behaviour. Journal of Management, 45(7), 2837–2860.
28.
PathakD., & SrivastavaS. (2020). Combating deviant behaviour for strengthening organisational commitment: Role of emotional intelligence. International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, 20(4), 534–549.
29.
Public Service Commission (2015–2017). Annual Report. Public Service Commission. Retrieved 2019, from http://www.psc.gov.lk/web/index.php?option=com_phocadownload&view=section&id=5%3Aannual-reports&Itemid=157&lang=en
30.
RobinsonS., & BennetR. (1997). A typology of deviant workplace behaviours: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 555–572.
31.
RobinsonS., & O’Leary-KellyA. (1998). Monkey see, monkey do: The influence of work groups on the anti-social behaviour of employees. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 658–672.
32.
SalancikG., & PfefferJ. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 224–253.
33.
SchneiderB. (1975). Organisational climates: An essay. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 437–454.
34.
Sri Lanka Establishments Code (1985). Establishments code. Ministry of Public Administration, Home Affairs, Provincial Councils and Local Government. Retrieved 2019, from https://www.pubad.gov.lk/web/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=45&Itemid=192&lang=en
35.
Sri Lanka Police. (2015). Opening of financial crime investigation division. Sri Lanka Police. Retrieved 2019, from https://www.police.lk/index.php/special-events-/1154-opening-of-financialcrime/
36.
TrevinoL., WeaverG., & ReynoldsS. (2006). Behavioural ethics in organisations: A review. Journal of Management, 32, 951–990.
37.
VardiY., & WienerY. (1996). Misbehaviour in organisations: A motivational framework. Organization Science, 7(2), 151–165.
38.
WarnakulasuriyaH. (2018). Bond scams: Is loss Rs. 11 billion or 1.5 trillion?The Island. Retrieved 2019, from http://www.island.lk/index.php?page_cat=article-details&page=articledetails&code_title=178772
39.
World Bank (2013). Removing impediments to sustainable economic development: The case of corruption. Global Indicators and Analysis Department. The World Bank. Retrieved 2019, from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/
