Considering the dearth of research on the performance of and the citizen’s trust in local government institutions (LGIs) in Bangladesh, this study focuses on Union Parishad (UP)—the lowest tier of LGIs at grassroots. By combining both quantitative and qualitative methods of investigation, primary data through questionnaire survey among service recipients and through key informants’ interviews with service providers have been collected, triangulated and analysed. The study, by evaluating institutional performance of the UPs against several variables, unveils a low level of citizen’s trust in UPs resulting from a low level of satisfaction regarding its performance. While the citizens identify the lack of timeliness, unfair practices and disrespectful behaviour during service delivery among key reasons behind the lack of trust, the institutional actors criticise the lack of institutional autonomy and resources for the poor performance and failures in satisfying local demands at the grassroots.
AchimuguH., StephenM. R., & AgboniU. J. (2013). Local government service delivery in Nigeria: An empirical comparison of government efforts and the people’s expectations. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(6), 335–335. 10.5901/mjss.2013.v4n6p335
2.
AhmedT. (2016). Bangladesh: Reform agenda for local governance. Prothoma Prokashan.
3.
AllenM. (2017). The Sage encyclopedia of communication research methods. Sage Publications.
4.
AminuzzamanS. M. (2010). Local government and development in Bangladesh lessons learned and challenges for improving service delivery of union parishad (UP). Local Government Division Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Co-operatives Government of People’s Republic of Bangladesh (GoB).
5.
AndrewsM., & ShahA. (2003). Assessing local government performance in developing countries. Measuring government performance in the delivery of public services. The World Bank.
6.
AskvikS., & JamilI. (2013). The institutional trust paradox in Bangladesh. Public Organization Review, 13(4), 459–476. 10.1007/s11115-013-0263-6
7.
BaniaminH. M., JamilI., & AskvikS. (2020). Mismatch between lower performance and higher trust in the civil service: Can culture provide an explanation?International Political Science Review, 41(2), 192–206. 10.1177/0192512118799756
8.
BeeriI., UsterA., & Vigoda-GadotE. (2019). Does performance management relate to good governance? A study of its relationship with citizens’ satisfaction with and trust in Israeli local government. Public Performance & Management Review, 42(2), 241–279. 10.1080/15309576.2018.1436074
9.
BhuiyanM. I. H., HassanS. K., & IslamK. M. (2018). Role of community-based organisations in promoting democratic local governance at the grassroots in Bangladesh. Journal of Development Policy and Practice, 3(2), 215–224. 10.1177/2455133318772410
10.
BlairH. (2000). Participation and accountability at the periphery: Democratic local governance in six countries. World Development, 28(1), 21–39. 10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00109-6
11.
BouckaertG. (2012). Trust and public administration. Administration, 60(1), 91–115.
12.
BouckaertG., & Van de WalleS. (2003). Comparing measures of citizen trust and user satisfaction as indicators of “good governance”: Difficulties in linking trust and satisfaction indicators. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 69(3), 329–343. 10.1177/0020852303693003
13.
BouckaertG., Van de WalleS., MaddensB., & KampenJ. K. (2002). Identity vs. performance: An overview of approaches explaining trust in government. Second Report. Public Management Institute.
14.
ChristensenT., & LaegreidP. (2005). Trust in government: The relative importance of service satisfaction, political factors, and demography. Public Performance & Management Review, 28(4), 487–511. 10.1080/15309576.2005.11051848
15.
DasguptaP. (2009, June). A matter of trust: Social capital and economic development [Paper presentation]. Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics (ABCDE), Seoul, Korea.
16.
EvansJ. R. (2012). Quality and performance excellence: Management, organization and strategy. Cengage Learning India Pvt. Ltd.
17.
FerdausJ., & HossainS. (2020). A review of local government institutions (LGIs) in Bangladesh. Journal of Governance and Integrity, 3(2). 10.15282/jgi.3.2.2020.5310
18.
FukuyamaF. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Free Press.
19.
IMF (2002). The role of capacity building in poverty reduction (IMF Issue Brief). International Monetary Fund.
20.
IslamF. (2015). The role of local self-government institution for deepening democracy at the grass-root level in Bangladesh. Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research, 7(2), 29–38. 10.5897/JPAPR2015.0311
21.
JamilI., & AskvikS. (2013). Citizens’ trust in public officials: Bangladesh and Nepal ‘compared. In JamilI., AskvikS. & DhakalT. N. (Eds.), In search of better governance in South Asia and beyond (pp. 145–163). Springer.
22.
JamilI., & AskvikS. (2015). Citizens’ trust in public and political institutions in Bangladesh and Nepal. In JamilI., AminuzzamanS. M. & HaqueS. T. M. (Eds.), Governance in South, Southeast, and East Asia (pp. 157–173). Springer. 10.1007/978-3-319-15218-9_10
23.
JodhkaS. S. (2002). Nation and village: Images of rural India in Gandhi, Nehru and Ambedkar. Economic & Political Weekly, 37(32), 3343–3353.
24.
JurnaliT., & Siti-NabihaA. K. (2015). Performance management system for local government: The Indonesian experience. Global Business Review, 16(3), 351–363. 10.1177/0972150915569923
25.
KhanM. M. (2008). Functioning of local government (Union Parishad): Legal and practical constraints. Democracy watch, RTI international, democratic local governance program-DLGP, USAID.
26.
KhanN. A. (2018). A political economy of forest resource use: Case studies of social forestry in Bangladesh. Routledge Revivals Series. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Ltd.
27.
KhanN. A., FerdousJ., & BhuiyanM. I. H. (2021). ‘Examining citizens’ trust in local government institutions: A focus on upazila parishads (sub-district councils) in Bangladesh. Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance, 24, 136–145. 10.5130/cjlg.vi24.7275
28.
KhanN. A., SahaS., & BhuiyanI. H. (2018). Mainstreaming sustainable development goals into local government of Bangladesh: An exploratory study. Dynamics of Public Administration, 35(1), 1–16. 10.5958/0976-0733.2018.00001.9
29.
KiddS., & KhondkerB. (2013). Scoping report on poverty and social protection in Bangladesh. Unpublished report for AusAID, Australia, Canberra. Retrieved August11, 2021, from http://www.developmentpathways.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Bangladesh-SP-Review-2014Feb20-Final.pdf
30.
KimS. E. (2005). The role of trust in the modern administrative state: An integrative model. Administration & Society, 37(5), 611–635. 10.1177/0095399705278596
31.
KramerR. M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 569–598.
32.
LiuH. (2015). Why is local government less trusted than central government in China? [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Birmingham.
33.
MakorereR. (2012). Towards understanding citizens trust in local government authorities in social service provision: A case of education service in Maswa district Tanzania. International Journal of Development and Sustainability, 1(2), 225–239.
34.
MimbaN. S. H., Van HeldenG. J., & TillemaS. (2007). Public sector performance measurement in developing countries. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 3(3), 192–208. 10.1108/18325910710820265
PandayP. K., & RabbaniM. G. (2011). Good governance at the grass-roots: Evidence from Union Parishads in Bangladesh. South Asian Survey, 18(2), 293–315. 10.1177/0971523113513376
37.
ParkerS., SpiresP., FarookF., & MeanM. (2008). State of trust: How to build better relationships between councils and the public. Demos.
38.
ShilN. C., & ChowdhuryA. (2023). A qualitative narrative on the practices of transparency and accountability at local government institutions: The case of a Union Parishad in Bangladesh. Local Administration Journal, 16(2), 151–176.
39.
UddinN. (2019). Empowerment through participation in local governance: The case of Union Parishad in Bangladesh. Public Administration and Policy, 22(1), 40–54. 10.1108/PAP-10-2018-0002
40.
UllahM. A., & PongquanS. (2010). Financial resources mobilization performance of rural local government: Case study of three union parishad in Bangladesh. Asian Social Science, 6(11), 95.
41.
VadevelooT., & SingaravellooK. (2013). Local government and community development. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 2(2), 54–59.
42.
YangK., & HolzerM. (2006). The performance–trust link: Implications for performance measurement’. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 114–126. 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00560.x
