The core purpose of publicly funded Higher Educational Institutions (HEIs) has been to extend the frontier of knowledge and cutting-edge quality research across disciplines. Accordingly, the HEIs should be such that can tackle social and economic questions and impact public policy. Interestingly, for attaining the desired and meaningful outcomes, HE funding should be accompanied by a corresponding development of faculty capabilities, including nurturing a vibrant academic culture and placing an emphasis on quality research. Moreover, every HEI should develop an institution-based research thrust across disciplines as envisaged in the New Education Policy, 2020.
AbdelkafiN., HilbigR., & LaudienS. M. (2018). Business models of entrepreneurial universities in the area of vocational education—An exploratory analysis. International Journal of Technology Management, 77(1/2/3), 86–108.
2.
AgarwalP. (2017). India’s growth of post secondary education: Scale, speed and fault lines. In AltbachP. G., ReisbergL., & de WitH. (Eds.), Responding to massification: Differentiation in postsecondary education world wide (pp. 75–87). Sense Publishers.
Banal-EstanolA., Jofre-BonetM., & LawsonC. (2015). The double-edged sword of industry ~ collaboration: Evidence from engineering academics in the UK. Research Policy, 44(6), 1160–1175.
5.
BhushanS. (2016). Institutional autonomy and leadership. In VargheseN. V. & MalikG. (Eds.), India higher education report 2015 (pp. 412–427). Routledge.
6.
BonoJ. E., & McNamaraG. (2011). Publishing in AMJ—Part 2: Research design. Editorial, Academy of Management Journal, 54(4), 657–660.
7.
BoraA. (2011). Higher education in India: A few aspects needing attention. University News, 49(20), 7–12.
8.
BougnolM. L., & DuláJ. H. (2015). Technical pitfalls in university rankings. Higher Education, 69(5), 859–866.
9.
BrockerhoffL., HuismanJ., & LauferM. (2015). Quality in higher education: A literature review. Centre for Higher Education Governance.
10.
ChowC. W., HadddadK., SinghG., & WuA. (2007). On using journal rank to proxy for an article’s contribution or value. Issues of Accounting Education, 22(3), 411–427.
11.
DholakiaP. M. (2006, January24). What makes an open education program sustainable?This Version, 1–5. https://www.oecd.org/education/ceri/36781781.pdf
12.
GhoshA. K. (2020, November9). Vice-chancellor’s vices. The Statesman, p. 5. https://www.thestatesman.com/opinion/vice-chancellors-vices-1502934419.html
13.
Government of India. (2012). 12th five year plan, 2012–2017. Planning Commission.
14.
GrassanoN., RotoloD., HuttonJ., LangF., & HopkinsM. M. (2017). Funding data from publication acknowledgments: Coverage, uses, and limitations. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68, 999–1017.
15.
GuptaS., & ChattarjiS. (2019). Protests, repression, restructuring: Contemplating Indian higher education in 2018. Postcolonial Studies, 22(1), 117–130.
16.
KaplanA. M., & HaenleinM. (2016). Higher education and the digital revolution: About MOOCs, SPOCs, social media, and the cookie monster. Business Horizon, 59, 441–450.
17.
KapurD., & MehtaP. B. (2004). Indian higher education reform: From half baked socialism to half-baked capitalism (CID Working Paper No. 108). Harvard University.
18.
KumaranS., & RajkumarT. (2019). Publications of Indian universities in national institutional ranking framework: A study. Library Philosophy and Practice, 2553, 1–11.
19.
MandalS. (2018). Emerging national qualification framework in India: A journey of dilemmas. Social Change, 48(4), 589–600.
20.
Ministry of Human Resource Development. (2020). National education policy (NEP). Government of India.
21.
NandaA. (2016, March4). Higher education is not just about funding. The Business Line, p. 8.
22.
NayakD. (2011). Karaoked: Plagiarism in the classroom. Economic and Political Weekly, 46(9), 49–53.
23.
Niti Aayog. (2017). India three year action agenda. Niti Aayog.
24.
PanigrahiJ. (2017). Resource allocation and innovative methods of financing higher education in India (Research Paper Series No. 6). CPRHE.
25.
Planning Commission. (2012). Committee on corporate participation in higher education: Report of NR Narayana Murthy Committee. Government of India.
26.
RofA., BikfalviA., & MarquèsP. (2020). Digital transformation for business model innovation in higher education: Overcoming the tensions. Sustainability, 12(12), 4980.
27.
RumyantsevaN. (2005). Taxonomy of corruption in higher education. Peabody Journal of Education, 80(1), 81–92.
28.
SharmaD. C. (2013, December28). Stings, scams and science. The Business Line, p. 9.
29.
ShuklaA., & SinghS. (2015). Facets of academic excellence in management education: Conceptualization and instrument development in India. Studies in Higher Education, 46(11), 1883–1899.
30.
SibalK. (2012). The new genre higher education framework. IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, 1(1) 47–49.
31.
SinghK. P., & AhmadS. (2011). Higher education in India: Major concerns. University News, 49(29), 1–5.
32.
SinhaV., & SubramanianK. S. (2013). Accreditation in India: Path of achieving educational excellence. Business Education and Accreditation, 5(2), 107–116.
33.
SivakumarenK. S., SophiaR., & Sheeba RaniS. (2018). Comparative study of Indian academic institutions in top NIRF rankings 2018. International Journal of Scientific Research and Review, 7(10), 664–676.
34.
StensakerB., BilbowG. T., BreslowL., & van der VaartR. (2017). Strengthening teaching and learning in research universities: Strategies and initiatives for institutional change. Springer.
35.
StephanP. (2012). How economics shapes science. Harvard University Press.
36.
StephensN. M., SummersS. L., WilliamsB., & WoodD. A. (2010). Accounting doctoral program rankings based on research productivity of program graduates. Account Horizons, 25(1), 149–179.
37.
StiglitzJ. E. (2000). Contribution of the economics of information to twentieth century economics. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(4), 1441–1478.
38.
TilakJ. B. G. (1995). Funding higher education in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 30(9), 426–429.
39.
TilakJ. B. G. (2004). Public subsidies in education in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(4), 343–359.
40.
TilakJ. B. G. (2018). On planning university development: Shibboleths versus stylized facts?Social Change, 48(1), 1–24.
WangJ. (2016). Knowledge creation in collaboration networks: Effects of tie configuration. Research Policy, 45(1), 68–80.
43.
WelchA. (2020). Governance and corruption in East and Southeast Asian higher education: Close Cousins, Close Encounters. In CapanoG. & JarvisD. S. L. (Eds.), Convergence and diversity in the governance of higher education (pp. 355–395). Cambridge University Press.
44.
World Bank. (1995). Priorities and strategies for education: A world bank review. World Bank.
45.
Yash Pal Committee. (2009). Report of the committee to advise on renovation and rejuvenation of higher education. Ministry of Human Resource and Development.
