M. Kotzur (Ed.), Peter Häberle on Constitutional Theory: Constitution as Culture and the Open Society of Constitutional Interpreters. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos, 2018, 323 pp., €84.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlexyR. (2010). Theory of constitutional rights (p. 163). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
2.
AmaralR. C. (2004). Peter Häberle e a Hermenêutica Constitucional. (trans., Peter Häberle and Constitutional Hermeneutics). Porto Alegre: Sergio Antonio Fabris Editor.
3.
Azpitarte SánchezM. (2003). Apuntes Sobre el Pensamiento de Peter Häberle (Notes on the Thought of Peter Häberle). Journal of the Law School of the University of Granada6, 345–364.
4.
BlankenagelA., PerniceI., & Schulze-FielitzH. (Eds.). (2004). Verfassung im Diskurs der Welt: Liber Amicorum für Peter Häberle (Constitution in the discourse of the world: liber amicorum for Peter Häberle). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
5.
CallejónF. B. (Ed.). (2004). Derecho Constitucional y Cultura (trans., Constitutional Law and Culture). Madrid: Editorial Tecnos.
6.
Camera dei deputati (2007). The constitution of the Italian Republic. Roma: Segreteria generale.
7.
CollingsJ. (2015). Democracy’s guardians: A history of the German federal constitutional court, 1951–2001 (p. 96). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
8.
DevA. N. (1946). Socialism and the national revolution. Bombay: Padma Publications.
9.
DevA. N. (1956). Baudh Dharma Darshana (in Hindi). Patna: Motilal Banarsidass.
10.
GandhiM. K. (2011). Trusteeship. Ahmedabad: Navjeevan Trust.
11.
HäberleP.(1990–1991). Current problems of German federalism (pp. 79–119). University of Rome II. Rome: Department of Public Law Yearbook.
12.
HäberleP. (1994). Constitutional developments in Eastern Europe—From the point of view of the legal philosophy and the constitutional theory. In TroperM. (Ed.), L’etat de droit (Cahiers de Philosophie Politique et Juridique) (Vol. 24, pp. 127–157) (trans., The Rule of Law). Paris: Presses Universitaires de Caen.
13.
HäberleP. (2000). The constitutional state and its reform requirements. Ratio Juris, 13(1), 77–94.
14.
HäberleP. (2001). Per una dottrina della costituzione come scienza della cultura (edizione italiana a cura di Jörg Luther) (For a Doctrine of the Constitution as a Science of Culture; Italian edition, trans. and edited by Jörg Luther). Roma: Carocci.
15.
HäberleP. (2006a). Legal comparison for constitutional development: The relevance of federalism and regionalism. In LutherJ., PassagliaP., & TarchiR. (Eds.), A world of second chambers (pp. 47–61). Milano: Giuffrѐ.
16.
HäberleP. (2006b). Function and significance of the constitutional courts in a comparative perspective. In PerniceI.KokottJ., SaundersC. (Eds.), The future of the European judicial system in a comparative perspective (pp. 65–75). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
17.
HäberleP. (2007). The German university cannot die—A thesis paper from the province. Stellenbosch Law Review, 1, 3–5.
18.
HäberleP. (2014). Ein portrait: Album 1934–2014 (A Portrait: Album 1934–2014). Pamplona: Thomson Reuters Aranzadi.
19.
HatajiriI. (2004). Eine Studie über die Verfassungslehre von P. Häberle und ihre Rezeption in Japan (A study on the Constitutional Theory of Peter Häberle and his reception in Japan). In YamashitaT. (Ed.), Festschrift (pp. 143–175). Tokyo.
20.
HoffmannF. (2003). Book review—Häberle and the world of the constitutional state. GLJ, 4(1), 1.
21.
KhalidH. (2015). In search of Shiva: A study of folk religious practices in Pakistan. Delhi: Rupa.
22.
KommersD. P., & MillerR. A. (2012). The constitutional jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany (3rd rev. ed., p. 33). Durham and London, UK: Duke University Press.
23.
KotzurM. (Ed.). (2018). Peter Häberle on constitutional theory: Constitution as culture and the open society of constitutional interpreters. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
24.
LutherJ. (2002). La scienza Häberliana delle costituzioni [The Häberlean science of constitutions, in Italian]. In ComanducciP. & GuastiniR. (Eds.), Analisi e Diritto 2001 Ricerche di Giurisprudenza Analitica (pp. 105–143). Turin: Giappichelli.
25.
LutherJ. (2014). Die Verfassungskultur des homo ridens (trans., The Constitutional Culture of Homo Ridens). In BlankenagelA. (Ed.), Den Verfassungsstaat nachdenken (trans., Thinking about the Constitutional State). Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
26.
MishraY. (1962). An early history of Vaishali. Patna: Motilal Banarsidass.
27.
MorlokM. (Ed.). (2001). Die Welt des Verfassungsstaates (trans., The World of the Constitutional State). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
28.
NikamN. A., & McKeonR. (Ed. and trans.). (1959). The edicts of Asoka (p. 31). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
29.
ParekhB. (2015). Debating India (pp. 36–41). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
30.
PosavecZ. (2002). Teorija ustavne države Petera Häberlea (trans., The Constitutional Theory of Peter Häberle and the Constitutional States). In državeUstavna (p. 279).
31.
RoyE. A. (2017, March16). New Zealand river granted same legal rights as human being. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/mar/16/newzealand-river-granted-same-legal-rights-as-human-being
32.
SegadoF. F. (2003). La Garantia del Contenido Esencial de los Derechos Fundamentales. (The Guarantee of Essential Content of Fundamental Rights) Madrid: Dykinson.
33.
SenA. (2001). Development as freedom. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
34.
SenA. (2010). The idea of justice. London, UK: Penguin.
35.
SenA. (2017). Collective choice and social welfare. London, UK: Penguin.
36.
SinghK. (1992, August22). Obituary: Achut Patwardhan. The Independent. Retrieved from https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/obituary-achyut-patwardhan-1541827.html
37.
SinghM. P. (2016). V.N. Shukla’s constitution of India (12th ed., pp. 387–388). Lucknow: Eastern Book Company.
38.
SinghM. P., & ShuklaV. N. (2016). Constitution of India (12th ed., p. 209). Lucknow: Eastern Book Company.
39.
SinhaB. (2017, July7). SC puts on hold Uttarakhand HC order declaring river Ganga a living entity. The Hindustan Times. Retrieved from https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/sc-puts-on-hold-uttarakhand-high-court-order-declaring-ganga-a-living-entity/story-IYqkaehoLhAyWfjAP8GYOO.html
40.
ValadésD. (Ed.). (2006). Conversaciones Académicas Con Peter Häberle (trans., Academic Conversations with Peter Häberle) (2. erweiterter Aufl. 2017). Mexiko-Stadt: UNAM.
41.
van OoyenR. Chr., & MöllersM. H. W. (Eds.). (2016). Verfassungs-Kultur: Staat, Europa und pluralistische Gesellschaft bei Peter Häberle. (trans., Constitutional Culture: State, Europe and Pluralistic Society in Peter Häberle). Baden-Baden: Nomos
42.
von KimH.-J. (1989). Dong-A Law Review, 9, 467–498.
43.
VosskuhleA., & WischmeyerT. (2015). Der Jurist im Kontext. Peter Häberle zum 80. Geburtstag (The Jurist in Context. Peter Häberle on his 80th Birthday). In Jahrbuch des Öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart (Yearbook of Public Law Today) (Vol. 63, pp. 401–428). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
