Deliberative democracy has gained considerable momentum in India in recent years in the wake of a new drive for decentralisation and democratisation to promote good governance. The constitutional amendment made in India in 1992 sought to institutionalise this concept in villages through a body called Gram Sabha (village assembly). The amendment mandates the constitution of this institution at the Gram Panchayat level (usually a cluster of villages), the functional details of which have been left to the hands of the states. The Gram Sabha is now in place in all the states though it varies from state to state in location and functions. Some states like West Bengal, have taken a step further by creating another body down the line at the level of the electoral constituency. This article presents a case study of Gram Sansads, as known in West Bengal against a general review of the working of the Gram Sabhas in India.
AltekarA. S. (2001). State and government in ancient India. Delhi: Motilal Banarasidas Publishers Private Ltd.
2.
BandyopadhayaR., & DufloE. (2004). Women as policy makers: Evidence from a randomized policy experiment in India. Econometrica, 72(5), 1409–1443.
3.
BardhanP., & MukherjeeD. (2006). Decentrali and local governance in the developing countries comparative perspective (South Asia Edition). Delhi: Oxford University Press.
4.
BesleyT., PandeR., & RaoV. (2005). Participatory democracy in action: Survey evidence from India. Journal of the European Economics Association Papers and Proceedings, 3(2–3), 648–657.
5.
BhattacharjeeS., & ChattopadhyayR. (2012). Women’s participation in deliberative democracy: An analysis of Gram Sansad meetings in West Bengal (Working Paper Series 1). Santiniketan: Department of Economics and Politics, Visva-Bharati University.
6.
BhattacharyaB. (Ed.). (1997). People’s power in practice: Twenty years of left front rule in West Bengal. Calcutta: National Book Agency Private Limited.
7.
BhattacharyaH. (1998). Micro-foundations of Bengal communism. New Delhi: Ajanta Books International.
8.
BhattacharyaM. (1999). Panchayati Raj in West Bengal. New Delhi: Manak Publishers.
9.
Centre for Study in Social Sciences. (2006). Rural decentralization in West Bengal. Kolkata: Author.
10.
ChakrabartyB. (2008). People’s participation in West Bengal Panchayat system. Kolkata: Mitram.
11.
DasS. (2015, May15) How effective are gram sabhas? (NCAER Study). New Delhi: Ideas for India.
12.
DattaP. (1997). Panchayats in West Bengal: Politics at the top. In GhoshB. P. (Ed.), Perspectives in political science (pp. 12–23). Burdwan: Academic Staff College, University of Burdwan.
13.
DattaP. (1999). The gram sabha experience. Frontline, pp. 51–52.
14.
DattaP. (2001). Panchayats, rural development and local autonomy: The West Bengal experience. Kolkata: Das Gupta & Co.
15.
DattaP. (2003a). Towards good governance and sustainable development. Kolkata: Das Gupta & Co.
16.
DattaP. (2003b). Women in panchayats in West Bengal. Kolkata: Dasgupta & Co.
17.
DattaP. (2008). Land reforms administration in West Bengal. New Delhi: Daya Publishing House.
18.
DattaP. (2009). Decentrali, participation and governance. New Delhi: Kalpaz Publishing House.
19.
DattaP. (2017a). Agrarian stagnation and the state: The response of the left front government in West Bengal. In GeorgeJ. (Ed.), Agrarian relations, peasant movements and rural distress in India. Mumbai: NavVishnu Publications.
20.
DattaP. (2017b). Gandhi’s vision, constitutionalised patterns and emerging challenges. In AshokN. & RaoJ. L. N. (Eds.), Gandhi and issues of contemporary times. Hyderabad: Osmania University.
21.
DelantryG. (2000). Citizenship in a global age: Society, culture and politics. Philadelphia: Philadelphia Open University.
22.
DiwakarR. R. (1963). Report of the study team on the position of the gram sabhas in Panchayati Raj movement. New Delhi: Government of India.
23.
DunningT., & NilekaniJ. (2013). Ethnic quotas and political mobilization: Caste, parties, and distribution in Indian village councils. American Political Science Review, 107(1), 35–56.
24.
ForrestW. G. (1966). The emergence of Greek democracy: The character of Greek politics (800–400) BC. London: Weidenfield and Nicholson.
25.
FosterA. D., & RosenzweigM. R. (2004). Democratization and the distribution of local public goods in a poor rural economy. Retrieved from siteresources.worldbank.org.INTPUBSERV/rosenzweigpdf
26.
GajwaniK., & ZhangX. (2014). Gender and public goods provision in Tamil Nadu’s village governments. The World Bank Economic Review, 29(2), 234–261.
27.
GandhiM. K. (1962). Village swaraj. Ahmedabad: Navajivan Publishing House.
28.
GastilJ. S., & KeithW. M. (2005). A nation that (sometimes) likes to talk. In GastilJ. S. & LevineP. (Eds.), Handbook on deliberative democracy (pp. 51–52). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
29.
GhatakM. (2002). Recent reforms in the panchayat system in West Bengal: Toward greater participatory governance. Economic & Political Weekly, 37(1), 45–58.
30.
HabermasJ. (1984). Theory of communicative action. Boston, MA: Bacon Press.
31.
JoshiG. V. (1995, April). Gram Sabha in Karnataka: A non-starter. Kurukshetra, 43(7), 113–116.
32.
KohliA. (1997). The state and poverty in India: Politics of reforms. New Delhi: Orient Longman.
33.
LietenG. K. (1996). Development, devolution and democracy: Village discourse in West Bengal. New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
34.
MathewG. (1999, October). Gram sabha and social audit. Kurukshetra, 48(1), 25–29.
35.
MenonP. (1996, February9). Sex slaves no more: Devdashis of Belgaum District break free. Frontline, pp. 85–87.
36.
MishraS. K. (1992). An approach to alternative rural development: Land reforms and Panchayats. Calcutta: Information and Cultural Affairs Department, Government of West Bengal.
37.
MukarjeeN., & BandyopadhayayD. (2003). New horizons for Panchayati Raj in West Bengal. Calcutta: Department of Panchayats, Government of West Bengal.
38.
MukherjeeS. (2007). The use and abuse of democracy in West Bengal. Economic & Political Weekly, 42(44), 101–108.
39.
NarayanD., ChambersR., ShahM. K., & PeteschP. (2000). Voices of the poor: Crying out for change. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
40.
OommenM. A. (1996). Panchayati Raj development report. New Delhi: Institute of Social Science.
41.
Participatory Research in Asia. (1997, August30). Proceedings of the seminar strengthening Panchayati Raj institutions in India. New Delhi: India International Centre.
42.
Rhys DavidsT. W. (1903). Buddhist India. Delhi: Motilal Banarasidas Publishers Private Ltd.
43.
SarkarA. (2006). Political economy of West Bengal. Economic & Political Weekly, 41(4), 341–348.
44.
SharmaA. P. (2013, May). Empowering gram sabhas through social audit. Kurukshetra, 61(7), 16–20.
45.
SmithG., & CorinneW. (2000). Citizens, juries and deliberative democracy. Political Studies, 48(1), 51–65.
46.
SwaminathanM. (1990). Village level implementation of IRDP: Comparison of West Bengal and Tamil Nadu. Economic & Political Weekly, 25(13), A17–A27.
47.
ThorlindR. (2000). Development, decentrali and democracy. Copenhagen: NIAS.
48.
WebsterN. (1992). Panchayati Raj and Decentrali of development planning. Kolkata: K.P. Bagchi.
