Administrative Theory of Regulation: The Indian Scenario

Abstract

The state, which regulates conduct in several ways, also regulates through the process of agencification: it creates independent regulatory authorities to set the market right, improve public service accountabilities, ensure proper alignment of incentives, encourage institutional innovation, integrate adequate domain knowledge and bring procedural fairness into the system. As a consequence, there are institutions with a unique administrative identity that are structurally situated at an arm’s length from the control of the state and therefore they are autonomous functionally. It is not only a unique situation in institutional terms but also a matter of establishing balance between autonomy and control in granting justice to the stakeholders. This article examines the realities of the precept in India and, then, reflects on the issues of reform. It keeps the comparative context on regulation in view, particularly the situation since the 2008 Global Financial Crisis and the lessons learnt by the holders of power in democracies.

Keywords

Regulation agencification regulatory authorities impact reform

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aglietta

(1998). Capitalism at the turn of the century: Regulation theory and the challenge of social change. New Left Review, I/232(November–December), 41–90.

Aglietta

(1979). A theory of capitalist regulation: The U.S. experience. London: New Left Books. (Translated from the French, first published in 1976).

Aglietta

(2000). A theory of capitalist regulation: The U.S. experience (2nd ed.). London: Verso (first published in French 1999).

Braithwaite

(2002a). Restorative justice and responsive regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Braithwaite

(2002b). Setting standards for restorative justice. British Journal of Criminology, 42(3), 563–577.

Braithwaite

(2008). Regulatory capitalism: How it works, ideas for making it work better. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Braithwaite

, & Drahos

(2000). Global business regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Breger

M. J.

, & Edles

G. J.

(2015). Independent agencies in the United States: Law, structure, and politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Comptroller and Auditor General of India. (2017). Performance audit of implementation of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 (Report Number 37). New Delhi: CAG.

10.

Glaeser

E. L.

, & Shleifer

(2003). The rise of the regulatory state. Journal of Economic Literature, 41(2), 401–425.

11.

Hampton

(2005). Reducing administrative burdens: Effective inspection and enforcement. London: HM Treasury. Retrieved from www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/hampton

12.

Huws

(2014). Labour in the global digital economy. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.

13.

Levi-Faur

(2005a). The global diffusion of regulatory capitalism. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 595(1), 12–32.

14.

Levi-Faur

(2005b). Regulatory capitalism: Policy irritants and convergent divergence. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 595(1), 191–197.

15.

Levi-Faur

(2009). Regulatory capitalism and the reassertion of the public interest. Polity and Society, 27(3), 181–191.

16.

Levi-Faur

(2010). Regulatory architectures for a global democracy: On democratic varieties of regulatory capitalism. In Prosser

& Carsten

(Eds), The challenges of global business authority (pp. 205–226). Albany, NY: State University of New York.

17.

Levi-Faur

(2017). Regulatory capitalism. In Drahos

(Ed.), Regulatory theory (p. 289). Canberra: Australian National University Press.

18.

Lipietz

(1988). Accumulation, crises, and ways out: Some methodological reflections on the concept of ‘regulation’. International Journal of Political Economy, 18(2), 10–43.

19.

Lipietz

(1997). The post-Fordist world: Labour relations, international hierarchy and global ecology. Review of Political Economy, 4(1), 2–29.

20.

Prosser

(2010a). Models of economic and social regulation. In Oliver

, Prosser

& Rawlings

(Eds), The regulatory state, constitutional implications (pp. 34–49). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

21.

Prosser

(2010b). Conclusions: Ten lessons. In Oliver

, Prosser

& Rawlings

(Eds), The regulatory state, constitutional implications (pp. 306–318). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

22.

Stigler

G. J.

(1971). The theory of economic regulation. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2(1), 3–21.

23.

Stiglitz

J. E.

(2010). Government failure vs. Market failure: Principles of regulation. In Balleisen

E. J.

& Moss

D. A.

(Eds), Government and markets, toward a new theory of regulation (pp. 50–51). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.