The roots of pro-poor growth or growth with employment generation can be strengthened by subscribing to policies that promote the provisioning of physical, health and educational infrastructure and encourage the population to acquire better skills and make themselves employable. Though the relative size of the service sector outweighs that of the industry, it is pertinent that the strategy of industrialisation is recognised as instrumental to creating productive employment opportunities. Higher levels of investment, particularly in urban spaces, are expected to yield higher returns. Interspatial spill-over effects can take place, and higher levels of urbanisation can be attained.
AcemogluD. (2003). Labor- and capital-augmenting technical change. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(1), 1–37.
2.
AcemogluD., & ZilibottiF. (2001, May). Productivity differences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(2), 563–606.
3.
AhluwaliaR., HasanR., KapoorM., & PanagariyaA. (2018). The impact of labor regulations on jobs and wages in India: Evidence from a natural experiment [working paper no. 2018-02]. SIPA, Deepak and Neera Raj Centre on Indian Economic Policies. https://indianeconomy.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/content/docs/2018-02-impact_of_labor_regulations_on_job_and_wages_in_india_0.pdf
4.
AutorD. (2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 3–30.
5.
BanerjeeA. V., & DufloE. (2014, April). Do firms want to borrow more? Testing credit constraints using a directed lending program. The Review of Economic Studies, 81(2), 572–607.
6.
BermanE., & StephenM. (2000). Skill-biased technology transfer around the world. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 16(3), 12–22.
7.
BhattacharjeaA. (2019). Labour market flexibility in Indian industry a critical survey of the literature [working papers 296]. Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics.
8.
DasD. K., & KalitaG. (2009). Do labor intensive industries generate employment? Evidence from firm level survey in India [working paper no. 237]. Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations.
9.
DjidonouG. R., & Foster-McGregorN. (2020). Stagnant manufacturing growth in India: The role of the informal economy. Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (UNU-MERIT). http://www.merit.unu.edu
10.
DoughertyS., Frisancho RoblesV. C., & KrishnaK. (2011). Employment protection legislation and plant-level productivity in India [working paper no. 17693]. National Bureau of Economic Research.
11.
EvensonR. E., & WestphalL. E. (1995). Chapter 37 technological change and technology strategy. In Handbook of development economics (Vol. 3 (Part 1), pp. 2209–2299). Elsevier.
12.
GoldarB. N. (2009). Impact of trade on employment generation in manufacturing in India. https://ideas.repec.org/p/eab/tradew/22921.html
13.
KorinekA., & StiglitzJ. (2017). Artificial intelligence and its implications for income distribution and unemployment [NBER working papers no 24174]. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
14.
KrishnaK. L., GoldarB. N., DasD. K., AggarwalS. C., ErumbanA. A., & DasP. C. (2023). India productivity report. Reserve Bank of India. https://m.rbi.org.in/Scripts/PublicationReportDetails.aspx?UrlPage=&ID=1217
15.
KuznetsS. (1966). Modern economic growth: Rate, structure, and spread. Yale University Press.
16.
MaitiD. (2019). Trade, labor share, and productivity in India’s industries [ADBI working papers 926]. Asian Development Bank Institute.
17.
MitraA. (2008). Social capital, livelihood and upward mobility. Habitat International, 32(2).
18.
MitraA. (2013). Insights into inclusive growth, employment and wellbeing in India. Springer.
19.
MitraA. (2019). Women’s work in response to urbanization: Evidence from Odisha. Indian Journal of Women and Social Change, 2019.
20.
MitraA. (2020). Urban headway and upward mobility in India. Cambridge University Press.
21.
MitraA., AristomeneV., & Veganzones-VaroudakisM.-A. (2002January). Productivity and technical efficiency in Indian states’ manufacturing: The role of infrastructure. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 50(2), 395–426.
22.
MitraA., & JhaA. K. (2015). Innovation and employment: a firm level study of Indian industries. Eurasia Business and Economics Society, 5(1), 45–71.
23.
MitraA., ShrivastavP. K., & SinghG. P. (2022). Livelihood volatility in the urban labour market: Reflections from the quarterly panel data (PLFS, 2017–18). Economic and Political Weekly, LVII(35).
24.
OECD.(2007). Economic policy reforms: Going for growth. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2007/02/economic-policy-reforms-2007_g1gh761f/growth-2007-en.pdf
25.
ParidaP. C., MitraA., & PradhanK. C. (2021). The missing middle phenomenon in Indian manufacturing sector: myths or realities?Journal of Economics and Development, 23(3), 317–331. https://doi.org/10.1108/JED-09-2020-0120
26.
SzirmaiA., & VerspagenB. (2015). Manufacturing and economic growth in developing countries, 1950–2005. In Structural change and economic dynamics (Vol. 34(C), pp. 46–59). Elsevier.
27.
UgurM., & MitraA. (2017). Technology adoption and employment in less developed countries: A mixed-method systematic review. World Development, 96(C), 1–18.
28.
UNIDO. (2005). Industrial development report 2005. In Capacity building for catching-up: Historical, empirical and policy dimensions.
29.
VerickS. (2018, December). Female labor force participation development (pp. 1–87). IZA World of Labor, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
30.
VivarelliM. (2013). Technology, employment and skills: An interpretative framework. Eurasian Business Review, 3, 66–89.
